New Suspect Emerges -- General Discussion

Discussion of all other Zodiac suspects should be posted here
gunmod
Newbie
gunmod
Newbie
Joined: January 4th, 2018, 4:42 am

January 7th, 2018, 7:26 pm #111

TomVoigt wrote:
Zaikgeist wrote: Nice work Tom.

As much as I hate to admit it, Watson looks a helluva more like the composite than Gaik.
I think Richard fits nicely.
Also, remember the carving in the old desk that had the initials RH
Quote
Like
Share

davidmad
DOJ
Joined: March 11th, 2007, 2:47 am

January 7th, 2018, 10:21 pm #112

AndyG wrote:
davidmad wrote:
Ekas1 wrote: Zodiac suspect or Donna Loss case suspect?

Interested to know more about him. He does look a bit like the composite.
It's been awhile since I've been a regular here.  Is Donna Lass still considered a likely Zodiac crime?   As I recall, the Pines card was revealed to be fake?  
I'm sure this has been ground to dust in the pedestal of the specific forum for her but my quick thoughts are this.

Z didn't abduct people he jumped them and killed them.  (KJ being a "possible" exception)
Z didn't hide (as far as we know) his victims, he displayed them.
That's sort of my take on it, too.  However, the Zodiac wrote that he would change his method of collecting slaves and would no longer announce his murders.   So I'm agnostic on this one I guess.
Quote
Like
Share

Brushbunny
Newbie
Joined: January 8th, 2018, 6:56 pm

January 9th, 2018, 3:47 pm #113

Somewhere else on this form, there was a poster talking about numbers and how Z was obsessed with the number 32. If this new suspect is 86, that would put him as possibly born in 1932. Just interesting if the poster was right. I will try to find the post.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Last edited by Brushbunny on January 11th, 2018, 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quote
Like
Share

gunmod
Newbie
gunmod
Newbie
Joined: January 4th, 2018, 4:42 am

January 9th, 2018, 7:11 pm #114

Brushbunny wrote: Somewhere else on this form, there was a poster talking about numbers and how Z was obsessed with the number 32. If this new suspect is 81, that would put him as possibly born in 1932. Just interesting if the poster was right. I will try to find the post.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
And if you believe the History Channel series, he was obsessed with comics and dime novels that would have been very popular for a kid growing that was born in the 30's
Quote
Like
Share

TomVoigt
Site Owner
TomVoigt
Site Owner
Joined: February 21st, 2007, 4:35 am

January 9th, 2018, 7:14 pm #115

Waterson was 37 in 1969.
Quote
Like
Share

Brushbunny
Newbie
Joined: January 8th, 2018, 6:56 pm

January 9th, 2018, 7:17 pm #116

TomVoigt wrote:Waterson was 37 in 1969.
So he would be 32 in 1964.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Quote
Like
Share

gunmod
Newbie
gunmod
Newbie
Joined: January 4th, 2018, 4:42 am

January 9th, 2018, 7:21 pm #117

Born in 32, Starting killing when 32.
1996 = 64 = 32*2
When did Waterson retire?


Also:
What was the final tally (victims) that Z "claimed" ?
Quote
Like
Share

Brushbunny
Newbie
Joined: January 8th, 2018, 6:56 pm

January 9th, 2018, 7:27 pm #118

gunmod wrote:Born in 32, Starting killing when 32.
1996 = 64 = 32*2
When did Waterson retire?


Also:
What was the final tally (victims) that Z "claimed" ?
37 was the tally he claimed I believe

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Quote
Like
Share

Wolfman
Newbie
Wolfman
Newbie
Joined: March 17th, 2015, 2:44 am

January 16th, 2018, 5:31 pm #119

Hahaha me too.

Every time I hear about the shuffling lope I think about Keyser Soze walking away.  I even picture Z losing the shuffle at the top of the stairs if that even was Z.
Quote
Like
Share

LauraK8
SFPD
Joined: December 31st, 2017, 8:32 pm

January 17th, 2018, 2:52 am #120

Wolfman wrote:Hahaha me too.

Every time I hear about the shuffling lope I think about Keyser Soze walking away.  I even picture Z losing the shuffle at the top of the stairs if that even was Z.
Fuckin’ cops.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote
Like
Share