New Suspect Emerges -- General Discussion


Discussion of the Zodiac TV mini-series "The Hunt for the Zodiac Killer" should be posted here
gunmod
Newbie
gunmod
Newbie
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 04:42

07 Jan 2018, 19:26 #111

TomVoigt wrote:
Zaikgeist wrote: Nice work Tom.

As much as I hate to admit it, Watson looks a helluva more like the composite than Gaik.
I think Richard fits nicely.
Also, remember the carving in the old desk that had the initials RH
Reply
Like

davidmad
DOJ
Joined: 11 Mar 2007, 02:47

07 Jan 2018, 22:21 #112

AndyG wrote:
davidmad wrote:
Ekas1 wrote: Zodiac suspect or Donna Loss case suspect?

Interested to know more about him. He does look a bit like the composite.
It's been awhile since I've been a regular here.  Is Donna Lass still considered a likely Zodiac crime?   As I recall, the Pines card was revealed to be fake?  
I'm sure this has been ground to dust in the pedestal of the specific forum for her but my quick thoughts are this.

Z didn't abduct people he jumped them and killed them.  (KJ being a "possible" exception)
Z didn't hide (as far as we know) his victims, he displayed them.
That's sort of my take on it, too.  However, the Zodiac wrote that he would change his method of collecting slaves and would no longer announce his murders.   So I'm agnostic on this one I guess.
Reply
Like

Brushbunny
Newbie
Joined: 08 Jan 2018, 18:56

09 Jan 2018, 15:47 #113

Somewhere else on this form, there was a poster talking about numbers and how Z was obsessed with the number 32. If this new suspect is 86, that would put him as possibly born in 1932. Just interesting if the poster was right. I will try to find the post.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Last edited by Brushbunny on 11 Jan 2018, 19:52, edited 1 time in total.
Reply
Like

gunmod
Newbie
gunmod
Newbie
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 04:42

09 Jan 2018, 19:11 #114

Brushbunny wrote: Somewhere else on this form, there was a poster talking about numbers and how Z was obsessed with the number 32. If this new suspect is 81, that would put him as possibly born in 1932. Just interesting if the poster was right. I will try to find the post.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
And if you believe the History Channel series, he was obsessed with comics and dime novels that would have been very popular for a kid growing that was born in the 30's
Reply
Like

TomVoigt
Site Owner
TomVoigt
Site Owner
Joined: 21 Feb 2007, 04:35

09 Jan 2018, 19:14 #115

Waterson was 37 in 1969.
Reply
Like

Brushbunny
Newbie
Joined: 08 Jan 2018, 18:56

09 Jan 2018, 19:17 #116

TomVoigt wrote:Waterson was 37 in 1969.
So he would be 32 in 1964.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Reply
Like

gunmod
Newbie
gunmod
Newbie
Joined: 04 Jan 2018, 04:42

09 Jan 2018, 19:21 #117

Born in 32, Starting killing when 32.
1996 = 64 = 32*2
When did Waterson retire?


Also:
What was the final tally (victims) that Z "claimed" ?
Reply
Like

Brushbunny
Newbie
Joined: 08 Jan 2018, 18:56

09 Jan 2018, 19:27 #118

gunmod wrote:Born in 32, Starting killing when 32.
1996 = 64 = 32*2
When did Waterson retire?


Also:
What was the final tally (victims) that Z "claimed" ?
37 was the tally he claimed I believe

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Reply
Like

Wolfman
Newbie
Wolfman
Newbie
Joined: 17 Mar 2015, 02:44

16 Jan 2018, 17:31 #119

Hahaha me too.

Every time I hear about the shuffling lope I think about Keyser Soze walking away.  I even picture Z losing the shuffle at the top of the stairs if that even was Z.
Reply
Like

LauraK8
Newbie
LauraK8
Newbie
Joined: 31 Dec 2017, 20:32

17 Jan 2018, 02:52 #120

Wolfman wrote:Hahaha me too.

Every time I hear about the shuffling lope I think about Keyser Soze walking away.  I even picture Z losing the shuffle at the top of the stairs if that even was Z.
Fuckin’ cops.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Like