Link: Copy link
Yes I have questions, but DH is right . You can make a case for people like Gyke also based on whats in the codes. Is everything a coincidence? Is it that Sullivan had an interest in codes? That Allen wore a zodiac watch? Is this part of some master plan with a false trail of breadcrumbs? AND why can such a good case that there is clues about EVB in the codes be made? was he the killer? OR did he have inside information? . Does he then look for something in the codes because he already knows something is there and he wants to cash in? He however probably does not know what that something is. Why are there possible clues to his identity? Who did not like EVB and would want his name in there besides EVB? AND maybe Gyke also? If there is a master plan you have to consider the halloween card is a code. I had to guesstimate what that is and what I came up with is something that implicates EVB. I sent the info to someone probably everyone knows on this forum and get ignored ,probably because they hate EVB as a suspect so much they do not consider one word I say even though my hunch is he probably is not the zodiac killer..Is the same person sending the codes the real killer? Why am I ignored when all I want is confirmation as to the dimensions of the halloween card? We already know Sandy decided against it being a key because of the timing, but I question her ability to ask the right questions in the first place. Without the right questions you are counting on dumb luck as to getting the right answer. My primary interest was with the codes but I may have to look into these things further.fxbby74 wrote: Any questions so far we have a complete name in a zodiac work lining up exactly to that names Zodiac birthday and that names position matching up to the 3 first I did it claims .
Pretty straight forward to understand so far I think .
Hi Paradice ,Paradice wrote: "The fact that he called himself the Zodiac" when? Is that a "someone said" he called himself the Zodiac source? Because the methodology you are using, starting with the solutions and plugging things in, is similar to the approach of every amateur who is sure they have solved a cipher.
I know whatever you are doing is more along the lines of numerology, but no matter how unlikely it seems that his name appears here or birthday appears there it boils down to circumstantial speculation. It may be darn interesting or compelling speculation, but it cannot be assumed as fact. That is probably the reason people are commenting that your work is interesting, but no one is jumping to endorse it. Is Gary going to use any of what you have done in future editions of his book?
Oh, the Baba comment was a compliment. I know the Lincoln part seems a bit backhanded, but I was just pointing out that he had an amazing mind for dates, numbers, etc. My point was I admire your determination (like I admired Baba's) even if I do not necessarily agree with your theories or solutions.
Thanks Paradice ,Paradice wrote: What I mean is how sometimes you know to use the Gregorian calendar and other times you know to use Z calendar. Or, sometimes you add all the dates and sometimes you subtract a certain number of days. I guess you have just had a lot of time to think about these things, but if you were presenting this theory in the early 70's, I would be highly suspicious of you being Z.
So, by plugging things in I meant that you knew when to multiply or add or subtract or .... Not that you were randomly selecting numbers and throwing them in, hope that clarifies my point.