Bigfoot News

CRYPTOZOOLOGY
Discussion of Bigfoot and other mysterious creatures should be posted here
Eric M
SFPD
Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 20:20

02 Jan 2012, 22:53 #121

In the preview of the new season they look at something hanging in a tree and say "that's not a chimpanze", and then go chasing after a noise!
On the show it looked like some guy hanging a food cache in a tree.
As Gram's younger sister, known as Little Avis, would later recall, “Things were mighty strange around the house.”
Reply
Like

Eric M
SFPD
Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 20:20

29 Mar 2012, 21:50 #122

As Gram's younger sister, known as Little Avis, would later recall, “Things were mighty strange around the house.”
Reply
Like

Eric M
SFPD
Joined: 24 Feb 2007, 20:20

04 Nov 2012, 23:15 #123

As Gram's younger sister, known as Little Avis, would later recall, “Things were mighty strange around the house.”
Reply
Like

m13
DOJ
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 23:40

05 Nov 2012, 03:26 #124

Not a bear.
I Said Good Day!
Reply
Like

Joined: 04 Mar 2008, 01:06

07 Nov 2012, 19:21 #125

And they went over to this area and obtained hairs,etc.?
Reply
Like

Joined: 17 Apr 2012, 04:31

08 Nov 2012, 21:10 #126

LAME video! Absolutely no detail whatsoever. And even when the 'thing' starts to 'stand up' it's only for a micro second. One of the crapiest ones I've seen.* Yawn *
Reply
Like

Bosch
SFPD
Joined: 15 Nov 2008, 08:34

12 Nov 2012, 15:33 #127

They analyze a bunch of blurry, grainy pictures and videos taken from far away.
Yep. Like they say...BIGFOOT IS BLURRY. Someone ought to include a poll in this thread to see how many people actually believe this Bigfoot nonsense.
Reply
Like

Joined: 17 Apr 2012, 04:31

30 Nov 2012, 18:40 #128

FLASH! Scientists have DOCUMENTED Bigfoot's DNA! AND they want Sasquatch protected as "an indigenous species".At least if you believe the report on CNN, below. A "team of scientists" have come up with their conclusions after examining 100 samples from Bigfoot. Itsy-bitsy problem: They never say WHO the "scientists" are & the video cuts off before it ends!<object width="416" height="374" classid="clsid27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/ap ... nn"><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/ap ... exists.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>I guess we'll never know.....
Reply
Like

Joined: 17 Apr 2012, 04:31

30 Nov 2012, 20:51 #129

But wait! There's MORE!Looks like there's an article that 'explains' here. But it also is very shady as to who this "research team" is. It only names one person, a "Doctor Melba Ketchum" and says she's a "respected researcher" from "East Texas". From which city?? Which university or research group is she with? No one reading this article would know. Even her name sounds fake. "Ketchum" as in Texas slang for "catch 'um", as in catch Bigfoot. Hopefully she's not with the research team of "Dewey, Cheatem & Howe". Maybe she's with "Dewey Katchem? And Howe!" http://www.kltv.com/story/20223730/east ... -dna[i]"An East Texas research team claims that a 5 year study of DNA proves the existence of the creature known as Bigfoot. A five-year genome study done by Nacogdoches Doctor Melba Ketchum has sent shock waves through the Bigfoot research phenomenon."I was surprised at the results. That was the first time I saw something that gave unusual results, we were able to do phenomenal research up to the point where we now have 3 whole genomes sequenced from 3 different individuals," Ketchum says.The study has created a buzz in the hunt for bigfoot."To have something of a scientific nature that's actually putting a stamp of validation on that makes it an exciting time," says East Texas Bigfoot researcher Mike Hall.Ketchum says the study based on hair samples confirms the existence of a new species, commonly called Bigfoot or Sasquatch, living in North America."The mitochondrial DNA is human in origin , all of the samples we've tested so far have shown that they originated with modern human women," says Ketchum.But not everyone is convinced."There's no reference here as to where the hair samples came from. Really and truly brings it back to the same thing , we don't have a specimen , alive or dead," says Gregg County Ag-Extension Agent Hugh Soape.A respected researcher, Ketchum's team has sequenced 3 complete Sasquatch nuclear genomes and determined the species is a human relative that arose approximately 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern homo sapiens with an unknown primate species."Doctor Ketchum has 50 plus samples from all over North America, this finally validates all of that field research," Hall says."They do have human in them , there is human sequence interspersed in their genome." Ketchum adds."Brings you back to the same point that we need something tangible," Soape says.Doctor Ketchum's research findings are currently under peer review, and she expects to have all research data published in the near future. Copyright 2012 KLTV. All rights reserved."[/i]
Reply
Like

Paradice
DOJ
Joined: 09 Mar 2007, 12:44

01 Dec 2012, 12:12 #130

Aren't they getting ahead of themselves? It might be prudent to actually find a bigfoot before they start dna testing.
Reply
Like