how many of you guys

craigfperry · May 19th, 2009, 7:55 pm #1 2009-05-19T19:55

are diggin the PBA's in your Gamos?

jmhenrichs · May 19th, 2009, 8:13 pm #2 2009-05-19T20:13

That's it though. When I got my BC I bought a couple extra tubes of them. Then I read about them. Backwards, I know! Anyway, I shot about 5 to see what the hype was about. Looked like a load of buckshot on the target. I gave half to my 72 year old uncle for his Crosman 760. He loves them in that. I use the rest in my 1377. They're so so. Wouldn't spend money on them again though.

craigfperry · May 19th, 2009, 8:21 pm #3 2009-05-19T20:21

Real Tree Hunter, they sound good in the gun.
i have not had a chance to test them for accuracy.
i imagine they wont do that great seein as how she is dead nuts with Kodiaks and FTS.

jmhenrichs · May 19th, 2009, 8:32 pm #4 2009-05-19T20:32

better for pumpers, CO2 or PCPs. Too light for a springer, be like a dry fire. There's a discussion on the main about them. Check it out.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/79537/th ... mo+Raptors

craigfperry · May 19th, 2009, 8:36 pm #5 2009-05-19T20:36

i have an experimental stock gun w just a lube tune, nearly 1000 rounds from 5.4 gr to 11.6 gr
i'm still waiting for it to break.

craigfperry · May 19th, 2009, 8:45 pm #6 2009-05-19T20:45

when you disagree with that but thats one that people talk about more then test to see what results you get but i am.
next is a brand new gun with a lube tune and i'm gonna see how many dry fires it takes to break it.

jmhenrichs · May 19th, 2009, 8:57 pm #7 2009-05-19T20:57

i have an experimental stock gun w just a lube tune, nearly 1000 rounds from 5.4 gr to 11.6 gr
i'm still waiting for it to break.

both tests. And let us know what happens. For now, I'll stick with the "too light" theory. I do think they're too light for good accuracy, though.

craigfperry · May 19th, 2009, 9:00 pm #8 2009-05-19T21:00

i agree with that......................n/t