Japanese Government eyes converting Izumo to aircraft carrier

Joined: January 7th, 2004, 2:14 am

December 26th, 2017, 3:53 pm #1

Well, remember what I said in the past about the possibility of Japan interpreting its constitution to allow for a carrier in defensive terms? (scroll to top of page since Tapatalk linking has bugs in it)

Looks like that's what may be happening:

Source: The Japan News by the Yomiuri Shinbun

Govt eyes converting Izumo to aircraft carrier


The Yomiuri Shimbun

8:23 pm, December 26, 2017

The government is considering remodeling the Maritime Self-Defense Force’s largest-class destroyer, the Izumo, into an aircraft carrier on which fighter jets can take off and land, The Yomiuri Shimbun has learned. If the plan materializes, it will be the first aircraft carrier to be possessed by the Self-Defense Forces.

According to multiple government sources, the government aims to begin operation of the aircraft carrier in the early 2020s, and it intends to maintain its interpretation that Japan cannot possess an aircraft carrier with attack capabilities, by using the envisaged aircraft carrier for defense purposes, such as using it as a refueling base in defending remote islands.

The government assumes that the new aircraft carrier will carry U.S. forces’ F-35B fighter jets (see below), the sources said. By strengthening Japan-U.S. cooperation, the government aims to prepare for threats posed by North Korea and China.

The Izumo is a destroyer with a large deck, and its shape is similar to that of an aircraft carrier. It has an overall length of 248 meters and a full load displacement of about 26,000 tons. It is said that the vessel is capable of carrying 14 helicopters. If it is remodeled into an aircraft carrier, it likely will be able to carry about 10 F-35B fighter jets, according to the sources.

In the remodeling, the deck’s heat resistance will be enhanced so that it can withstand the heat produced by the jet engine of an F-35B fighter jet, the sources said. A specific remodeling method will be examined going forward, including a plan to build a slope into the deck to assist aircraft in taking off, much like a ski jump.

The Defense Ministry aims to appropriate research expenses in the fiscal 2019 budget, the sources said.

The government also is considering deploying F-35B fighter jets to the Air Self-Defense Force. However, if F-35B fighter jets are loaded onto the envisaged aircraft carrier, it would directly mean Japan’s acquisition of the ability to hit enemy bases. Therefore, the government will decide the issue based on discussions for the revision of the National Defense Program Guidelines at the end of 2018.

The purpose of possessing an aircraft carrier is to promote integrated operations between Japan and the United States through refueling U.S. forces’ aircraft on the aircraft carrier.

Under the security-related legislation that went into effect in March 2016 and the new Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) that took effect in April 2017, Japan is now able to refuel U.S. forces’ aircraft in a wider range of situations, such as exercises in peacetime and preparation for action in case of emergencies.

The use of a Japanese aircraft carrier by U.S. forces will help enhance the ability to defend remote islands and the MSDF’s defense capabilities. In case of enemy attacks on remote islands or MSDF fleets, if U.S. fighter jets can land and refuel on the aircraft carrier deployed at a place an appropriate distance from the enemy, the ability to deal with the enemy will be increased.

If U.S. military bases in Japan are destroyed in case of a contingency, the aircraft carrier will serve as a substitute runway.

In fact, North Korea has mentioned the possibility of attacking U.S. military bases in Japan with ballistic missiles. In case of an emergency on the Korean Peninsula, runways at the bases could become unusable. At the same time, China is expanding its maritime advances. Given these situations, building up the ability to defend remote islands is an urgent issue facing Japan.

The government has cited an aircraft carrier with attack capabilities as an example of armed forces with war potential, the possession of which is prohibited under Paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the Constitution.

However, a senior Defense Ministry official said, “If it is used for defense purposes, it will not fall under the category of an aircraft carrier with attack capabilities.”

■ F-35B fighter jet

A state-of-the-art stealth fighter jet jointly developed by nine countries, including the United States and Britain. It is capable of performing short takeoffs and vertical landings. The aircraft is expected to be used for missions on the front line where it is impossible to ensure long takeoff distances and for other missions. It is operated by the U.S. Marine Corps, and has been deployed at the marines’ Iwakuni base in Iwakuni, Yamaguchi Prefecture, from January 2017.


Sargon
'I have a plan so cunning, you could pin a tail on it and call it a weasel.'

Capt. Edmund Blackadder, from 'Blackadder Goes Forth' (BBC TV)
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 14th, 2008, 6:59 pm

December 28th, 2017, 11:56 pm #2

And the Chinese are “warning” Japan not to equip their sovereign ships the way they want.  What’s hubris in Mandarin?
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 20th, 2017, 12:34 pm

December 29th, 2017, 12:12 am #3

Great news!  I've been urging this for years.  Now its time build a pair of real catobar carriers from the keel up, something in 80,000 ton range should do very well.  Japan is the United States' most loyal and I think will prove to be most militarily effective ally.  They need to ditch MacArthur's constitution though.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: April 28th, 2015, 1:38 am

January 15th, 2018, 10:35 pm #4

The RN units should be available shortly if things keep going the way they are.
Quote
Like
Share

a77
Joined: February 15th, 2004, 4:34 am

March 17th, 2018, 7:35 am #5

Are the ship "prepare" for fighter jets.... as in the deck can take the jetblast, the lift can take the extra weight etc? As we did build the ship to be be able to convert them relatively easy to jet carrier in the future if we want... or the ship need loots of retrofit/rebuildning to convert them to jet carrier.

Quote
Like
Share

Joined: February 17th, 2013, 9:37 pm

March 24th, 2018, 3:15 pm #6

chb2c wrote: And the Chinese are “warning” Japan not to equip their sovereign ships the way they want.  What’s hubris in Mandarin?
Is there any possibility that China might actually seek to sink the Izumo as a "pre-emptive action to prevent Japan from returning to its imperialistic ways"? If so, what would be the response?
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 5th, 2018, 2:38 pm

March 24th, 2018, 3:20 pm #7

Seafort wrote:
chb2c wrote: And the Chinese are “warning” Japan not to equip their sovereign ships the way they want.  What’s hubris in Mandarin?
Is there any possibility that China might actually seek to sink the Izumo as a "pre-emptive action to prevent Japan from returning to its imperialistic ways"? If so, what would be the response?
War? Sink the crappy ChiCom carrier? Who knows.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 14th, 2013, 4:04 pm

March 24th, 2018, 3:22 pm #8

China does not want war with the United States which would be the result of such an action.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: September 30th, 2003, 5:00 pm

March 25th, 2018, 1:10 am #9

I am not convinced of that, there undoubtedly people in the Chinese leadership that do want a war, and if for one reason or another the pro war  bunch could grab the President by the short and curly's over something they could push him into it, and that is assuming the Mr President for life is not pro war himself. 
Without communications, all I control is my desk, and that is not a very lethal weapon."
Gen. T.S. Power, CINCSAC, May 1959
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 14th, 2013, 4:04 pm

March 25th, 2018, 1:25 am #10

Think of the Chinese as Feringhe.  War is bad for business.  
Quote
Like
Share