Link: Copy link
Reread the description of 3Pfuturenz wrote:AHEAD: An upgrade for the GDF series guns built around a special projectile which explodes at a pre-calculated point in front of the target, sending a cone of 152 tungsten sub-projectiles at the target.
Time fused but matched to a gun with integrated systems to calculate muzzle speed etc and program each projectile as it fires. Designed specifically as an anti-missile gun, so no need to waste the flash ammo on surface targets that are probably more suited to HE or APDS.
I'd go with Sea Ceptor, backed up by 76mm Strales backed up by the 40mm.futurenz wrote:Similar round, but not much advantage considering the bigger cannon required to fire it. Deck penetrating mounts might give the advantage for reloading, so why not 57-mm Mk 295. Smaller faster cannon for close-in targets that the 57mm missed, dangerous to rely too much on a single self defence gun. 57mm for targets the ESSM missed, layered self defence still makes sense. CIWS rail gun might happen eventually too.
Thirty seconds from an M61, how many rounds is that? Kind of interesting, I thought all those cold war tanks were designed to resist autocannon fire. I guess not 3000 rounds to the same spot, though.carailwhale wrote:With a CIWS you don't need anything but solid shot. When I was in EOD school we were shown a film of a M-61 shooting at a M-48 tank's turret. In less than thirty seconds the solid shot had chewed a hole in one side of the turret and out the other. Admittedly that was on a stable surface, but very few small craft carry three inches of armor. A ten second burst from a CIWS would reduce pretty much any boat smaller than forty feet to a pile of fiberglass splinters and if aimed at the waterline would sink anything larger.BBMW wrote: 1) The newer versions of the Phalax, with the added EO sighting system, can be used against surface targets.
2) It's not optimal, since it uses solid shot ammo. A 30mm with explosive time and/or proximity fused ammo would be better for surface defense. Then again a 30mm cannon wih proximity a fused round would make for an interesting CIWS.
Definitely true. Although it piques my interest that it's physically possible.Dave AAA wrote: It's unlikely that a working tank o the battlefield would sit still while a Vulcan-style gun chewed through the armour. On a moving target, that would be ineffective.
Are you familiar with the GAU-30?Dave AAA wrote: It's unlikely that a working tank o the battlefield would sit still while a Vulcan-style gun chewed through the armour. On a moving target, that would be ineffective.
That doesn't "chew through" armor. It penetrates the sides and top of the tank.2lapsdown wrote:Are you familiar with the GAU-30?Dave AAA wrote: It's unlikely that a working tank o the battlefield would sit still while a Vulcan-style gun chewed through the armour. On a moving target, that would be ineffective.