Here you go Richard... Tudor Chrono review

Vintage Rolex Discussion

Here you go Richard... Tudor Chrono review

Joined: February 9th, 2007, 7:33 pm

July 24th, 2010, 5:43 am #1


My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Last edited by rlxDeusIrae on July 31st, 2010, 4:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: December 6th, 2005, 9:00 pm

July 24th, 2010, 6:58 am #2

thank you for the time and effort and this Tudor should be available in the UK.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: July 5th, 2009, 1:59 am

July 24th, 2010, 7:00 am #3

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Not that I had any doubt BUT I want one.....................
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 9th, 2008, 12:55 pm

July 24th, 2010, 7:02 am #4

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Reneo
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 1st, 1970, 12:00 am

July 24th, 2010, 7:32 am #5

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard


.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: September 10th, 2007, 6:33 pm

July 24th, 2010, 7:34 am #6

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Bernhard my Friend, very very GREAT Posting for the Heritage!!Thx!
911 Greetings, Pasci
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: September 23rd, 2003, 3:40 pm

July 24th, 2010, 8:01 am #7

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Fantastic review with exceptional photos...

Just one thing - aren't you supposed to be on vacation?

Go take some time away from watches and work (in that order) with your family!!

Enjoy!

MW

Quote
Like
Share

Joined: October 12th, 2006, 4:29 pm

July 24th, 2010, 1:41 pm #8

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Love your insight into the old and new. Regards, BTW I am getting a couple of straps from Peter Gunny.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: April 2nd, 2006, 3:51 am

July 24th, 2010, 1:46 pm #9

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Your posts get me fired up to get mine. Unfortunately I have to wait until the first of September.

And the pics are amazing!!!

Frank
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 16th, 2010, 11:11 am

July 24th, 2010, 1:47 pm #10

My Tudor Heritage Review

Here we go.. after wearing it for almost a month and looking at more details, here is what I think of it.
Also you will find many images!



To start off my review. I love that watch. It's the first modern sapphire watch that does not get flat and boring on my wrist after 2 days.
So maybe it's better to first start with my back-ground. So you understand my comments.
I am madly in love with vintage Rolex. And love the super-domed plexis and special look the old subs and chronos have. In my years I tried several modern watches like Daytona. Submariner and Seadweller. And also I bought special versions like matte dial 16660, early Zenith Daytona's in great condition. I always felt like the watch went dead on my wrist. Cool on images. But on the wrist it's just flat and not alive. Because of the sapphire. As it makes the watch look the same. No matter which angle you look at it. Special on Subs as they have little detail on the dial the watch loses all its magic for me. A super-domed makes the dial alive. Change of angle and the indexes start to dance... etc.

Well this Tudor Heritage Chrono is very alive! 42 mm alive! So for me as plexi lover, vintage freak saying 'I love this watch' means something. But indeed my feeling is of course coloured

I was very lucky to get one of the first on the market.

Here we go...

The Legacy:

The Tudor Homeplate is for me one of the most iconic watches of the 70th. And you can feel it in all its design and colours. Like the Newman dials it had a lot of details. The orange is a very dominant colour in the design. As is the grey. The combination with the black subdials gives it a lot of depth. Iconic is the shape of the indexes. The refer to the baseball homeplates. That's how it got his name. But it's also called Porsche-dial. The references where 7031 and 7032. One with steel and one with bakelite bezel. For the new one the bakelite bezel was the reference. There was also a black dial version. Like the new one now. It is ultra rare and supposed to be a first series made for Asia market first. As far as I was told. 2 collector friends own such a watch. They are truly magical.











And the bakelite version in MINT condition (thanks to Bas).



The Feeling and Design:

The feeling of the watch is great. Somehow it has a great mixture of that vintage feeling and a modern watch. They did not just copy the old design. But changed some parts. The bezel and pusher give that more modern feeling. Great details. The hole package feels like quality.
Last 2 weeks more watches where shown on forums.. and for my surprise i have seen them coming from ADs with different boxes also. Red and grey... different quality. Maybe just a mix-up from the AD?
The plack box looks great and feels a bit luxury. Piano-varnish finish. Nice details also. Inside is the watch on steel bracelet and the NATO strap.









The watch has a nice case. Higher than the old one. 42 mm. But not looking extreme big. As I don't like the Deepsea. This one feels much more in balance. It is less curved then the older ones. It is quite straight.



The dial has a lot of details. The indexes and subdials are 3 dimensional. The orange of the numbers and second hand feels a bit vintage. Not to bright. Just that bit fade look. Love it.

On the NATO strap, which really looks fantastic the watch has a more toolwatch-look. Even more like a dive watch then a chronograph. The bezel shows a scale from 1-12. Which is more for a second timezone then the vintage one had a speed-scale. Which is a bit of a pity. The more typographic details would have looked great. I am sure.











The steel bracelet is well designed. And fits great to the case. When put on a NATO the look from side is a bit strange at first. As the space between the lugs is quite high and visible then. But after wearing it for a while I don't see that as a problem. The sapphire misses the cyclope of the old version. But I don't miss it.





Ok it's only a Eta movement. But I don't mind. As they are good enough for daily use. And as the vintage ones also had 'simple' movements and still run today I don't worry too much about that. It's an Eta 2894.

The total feeling of the watch feels like quality! A lot of nice details. The case shows nice curves and polished lugs. As said I feel it's a great balanced design.



Between the 2 versions with black and grey dial.... the difference is that the grey one looks more vintage. More warm. The black one is more 'bang' in your face. But for me also a bit more boring. As the contrast is bigger and less variation. But that is personal.

The Details:

The dial has so many nice details. Great colour of grey. Indexes that stand out. Nice typography in the outer track. But the bezel, pushers and crown have the greatest detail. The structure really looks cool. It adds a lot of quality.























The straps look fantastic. The NATO has a fantastic clasp. And special are the 'build-in' pushers. The material is real nice. And the striping adds a lot to the toolwatch/professional look.







But also the steel bracelet looks well designed. 22mm but not looking bulky. When i remember the Deepsea bracelet they did a way better job at this one.









Compared to a GMT:

Well look for yourself ...







And old and new...





Black or grey?

I prefer the grey over the black one.
As the black one feels more like a 'new' design watch to me. But that is taste. Both looks great.







My Conclusion:

Well i guess you know what I feel about it. Why all this fuzz about a 3K euro Tudor.
For me it is the perfect all day watch! As I was looking for a modern no issue watch for swimming, work, tennis etc. It's the perfect combination of that and the vintage/heritage feeling. A perfect mix between that cool vintage look and modern size and standard. So why not just buy a 14060 or LV sub. Also great watches. But they always remind me of my vintage subs and miss that superdomed sex.

The new Submariner... mhhh haven't seen it live. But paying about 5700 euro... i start thinking vintage gilt sub again.... instead a modern watch.

So for me the Tudor is the perfect holiday/daily watch. Chronograph style. A lot of great detail. Quality looks. And looks different to the rest of the modern watches.

And on the NATO it's such a eye-candy. But also a real toolwatch. More like a cool dive-watch.



To be honest... i have owned a vintage one. A real nice one. But with this one... i feel no need to get an old one anymore. The vintage feeling is all there. But at a price... you can get one without worry and get a great vintage Rolex also.

I think Rolex really did a great job with it. And maybe it's a test or prediction that Rolex is taking its own heritage more and more serious. As we vintage collectors are hoping so long that Rolex will cherish its own heritage more. As the brand and the brand name is build on that! So maybe more exciting stuff will arrive in the future.

I think any vintage Rolex freak should have one.

Some more images...and look how a Chronograph can look like a dive-watch LOOL!











Best,

Bernhard
Have you had any trouble with the hands jumping around when using the Chrono?

Cheers
Pete
Quote
Like
Share