redhead
Literary lunatic
redhead
Literary lunatic
Joined: August 13th, 2015, 5:14 pm

October 9th, 2017, 3:37 pm #121

Well, for a change of pace, I'll say he wasn't exactly my first choice, but overall I'm happy with the pick. One of the better recent picks in my eyes.
Quote
Like
Share

Heteronym
Forum junkie
Heteronym
Forum junkie
Joined: October 9th, 2008, 12:42 pm

October 9th, 2017, 9:12 pm #122

redhead wrote:Well, for a change of pace, I'll say he wasn't exactly my first choice, but overall I'm happy with the pick. One of the better recent picks in my eyes.
A decade ago, I enjoyed reading The Remains of the Day. But I only know Ishiguro from that novel. These days, for a few years now, I don't care who wins; I don't follow the discussions, I don't try to guess. The probabilities of someone I've actually read and enjoyed winning are so slim, it's a waste of time and energy. I even forget it's that time of the year until I start seeing this thread rise like Lazarus.

I'm more fascinated by the fallout, the spectacle around the whole thing afterwards. So many columnists take the prize so seriously and think its behaviour and choices will have earth-shattering implications for the future of literature, it's so funny.
Quote
Like
Share

suzannahhh
Forum junkie
suzannahhh
Forum junkie
Joined: November 20th, 2006, 4:54 pm

October 9th, 2017, 10:40 pm #123

Heteronym wrote:
redhead wrote:Well, for a change of pace, I'll say he wasn't exactly my first choice, but overall I'm happy with the pick. One of the better recent picks in my eyes.
A decade ago, I enjoyed reading The Remains of the Day. But I only know Ishiguro from that novel. These days, for a few years now, I don't care who wins; I don't follow the discussions, I don't try to guess. The probabilities of someone I've actually read and enjoyed winning are so slim, it's a waste of time and energy. I even forget it's that time of the year until I start seeing this thread rise like Lazarus.

I'm more fascinated by the fallout, the spectacle around the whole thing afterwards. So many columnists take the prize so seriously and think its behaviour and choices will have earth-shattering implications for the future of literature, it's so funny.
I concur completely, hetero
Quote
Like
Share

redhead
Literary lunatic
redhead
Literary lunatic
Joined: August 13th, 2015, 5:14 pm

October 10th, 2017, 12:04 am #124

I enjoy the speculation because I enjoy award speculation in general, but yeah I know it could easily get annoying to others.

And yes, the hype around the prize is a bit ridiculous. Too many people (including me a few years ago) treated it as some big canon of authors when it's really just an award, only with more name recognition and a longer legacy.
Quote
Like
Share

nnyhav
Forum junkie
nnyhav
Forum junkie
Joined: October 6th, 2008, 12:26 pm

October 10th, 2017, 3:10 am #125

It's just the award, the one everybody's heard of however little read, with a cachet not only from longevity but also by association with the awards in the sciences and the Peace Prize. It matters less to me as I've become better read (& speaking of canons, among my 10 fave 20c writers only Beckett chosen), and last year's fiasco almost put me off it entirely (this year merely a lost opportunity), but in terms of keeping literature alive to the general public it has no equal. Which is why squandering the legacy (downward arc upthread, turning it into just an award) irks me.
Quote
Like
Share

oneofmurphysbiscuits
Forum junkie
Joined: April 15th, 2007, 9:12 pm

October 10th, 2017, 7:49 am #126

I find the month upon month second guessing, listings and meta/purported reasonings about to be inordinately tedious and having very little bearing on the books I read,i'm trying to remember if I've ever read an author on my own account and because they were a Nobel recipient andi'm not sure there is one. But it should count for something, if they're really as self important as all that (and here I mean the academy members) then it ought to matter; they ought/should be able to think about what they're saying in giving an award once given to Beckett to Ishiguro, it's casual impoverishment and an abdication by stealth of responsibilities avowed, not abjured.
I only think, if that is the name for this vertiginous panic as of hornets smoked out of their nests, once a certain degree of terror has been exceeded
Quote
Like
Share

redhead
Literary lunatic
redhead
Literary lunatic
Joined: August 13th, 2015, 5:14 pm

October 13th, 2017, 10:40 pm #127

When I say it's just an award, I mean I don't treat it as some canon of select authors or anything like that. I mean I expect them to make some missteps, compromise choices, etc, and not create a list written in stone of the greatest authors since 1900 (I think any list that attempts such a task is doomed from the outset). The media circus surrounding it is important for literature as a whole, but so long as the writer is good, I don't care if they're obscure or world famous.

Ishiguro is more in that latter category. I've enjoyed a few of his novels, enough so that I'm pleased with his pick. I can see why many would consider him mediocre or dislike him, but I still like his work. I'd rank him above a bunch of the frontrunners this year, anyway. Does he tarnish the Nobel's legacy? I think most people can agree, even if they hate Ishiguro, he doesn't anymore than Russell, Churchill, Fo, Buck, Lewis, Dylan, or the '74 scandal. It would be great if every winner was comparable in quality to Beckett, but as someone who follows the speculation for fun, I feel that's just setting myself up for disappointment.
Quote
Like
Share

oneofmurphysbiscuits
Forum junkie
Joined: April 15th, 2007, 9:12 pm

October 13th, 2017, 11:14 pm #128

Ishiguro doesn’t tarnish anything, no, red, and neither is the award a monolith or a canon set in stone,(I have always and would continue to oppose any such thinking and i’m strongly supposing that Dave would as well). What’s been squandered is a capacity for ingenuity in thinking, thus it’s the limitations of the Academy we’re annoyed by, not any author in particular :)
I only think, if that is the name for this vertiginous panic as of hornets smoked out of their nests, once a certain degree of terror has been exceeded
Quote
Like
Share

nnyhav
Forum junkie
nnyhav
Forum junkie
Joined: October 6th, 2008, 12:26 pm

October 13th, 2017, 11:20 pm #129

yep, what biskit said
Quote
Like
Share

redhead
Literary lunatic
redhead
Literary lunatic
Joined: August 13th, 2015, 5:14 pm

October 13th, 2017, 11:27 pm #130

Ah I see, my mistake. Got no qualms with what you're saying, then
Quote
Like
Share