LibwithaClue
21K2,1354
21K2,1354

    Oct 31, 2020#31

    October 31, 2020
    Obamagate, the Movie
    By Patricia McCarthy

    Phelim McAleer and his wife Ann McElhinney have made several documentaries.  The most recent and most powerful was their film about Kermit Gosnell: Gosnell: The Trial of America's Biggest Serial Killer.  Gosnell was the go-to abortion doctor in Philadelphia who had no problem killing infants born alive.

    Their latest project is a staged production of the virtual texts between Russia collusion hoaxers within the FBI, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.  Strzok was a higher-up in the FBI with aspirations to go higher.  Page was Andrew McCabe's in-house lawyer who was having an affair with Strzok.  Apparently, the all-consuming quest to prevent Trump's election and then, after he was elected, the mission to take him down by any means necessary was an aphrodisiac until it wasn't.

    The film, which can be seen at Obamagate the Movie.com and is embedded below, is a re-enactment of the verbatim texts between the two lovers/players; it includes the exact words not only of Strzok and Page with their various punctuation and emojis, but also texts of John Brennan and James Comey and passages of Strzok and Page before the House Judiciary Committee as they were grilled by the always impressive Jim Jordan.




    The film is worth watching.  If the American public has thought that the people who hold the jobs in our institutions like the FBI were paragons of virtue, the cream of our intellectual crop, this film will be wake-up call.  These two arrogant operatives, Strzok and Page, communicate like immature middle-schoolers.  They are giddy, profane, sexually suggestive, inarticulate, and childish in the extreme.  How do people like this attain such powerful positions in our government?
    It is an undeniable fact that the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the CIA, the DOJ, and the FBI.  Obama purged our military of great generals and replaced them with men and women who were directed to diminish our military, and diminish it they did.  Trump has thankfully corrected that bit of treason and revitalized, re-supplied, and re-energized the U.S. military.  Obama hated the military; Trump and his supporters revere all those who serve.  Trump-supporters honor our law enforcement personnel; the Obama administration had contempt for them.  Neither Biden nor Harris has uttered a word of criticism of the violence perpetrated by Black Lives Matter or Antifa.  How could they?  Those rioters, arsonists, and looters are their voters, their base.

    So it is no surprise that those who participated in the Russia collusion hoax believed they were doing their president's bidding.  They were.  Obama and his henchmen were all on board to take candidate Trump down and out.  Once elected, they continued their mission to see the president removed from office.  The plan was calculated and furthered by willing dupes like Strzok and Page, aspirational worker bees drunk with the perceived power of their positions in the FBI!  Both are an embarrassment to that institution.

    John Brennan has humiliated the CIA.  James Clapper has disgraced the office of the director of National Intelligence.  In short, the people who have somehow risen to the top of these purportedly elite institutions are all shills for the Deep State that is shot through with corruption and abject stupidity.  No wonder Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, and Joe Biden were free to plunder every circumstance, every opportunity available to exploit.  And exploit they certainly did.

    This enlightening film that brings to life the words of Strzok and Page is shocking, like discovering that high school seniors cannot read or do simple math.  Page made it through law school but seems so catastrophically unwise that one wonders how.  Strzok just got hired by Georgetown University to teach!  He is a graduate of that university, which means no one should send his college-aged child there ever, ever again.  It is a university devoid of a moral or ethical sense.  To hire a man so deeply corrupt is a sign of a wholesale lack of ethics.
    The Obama administration did terrible damage to this country.  It set race relations back fifty years.  The American people do not care about skin color!  Only Democrat politicians do; they remain the only surviving racists.  Joe Biden is one of the worst among them.  To divide us by race is their only game.  Take a look at Biden's record of embracing the likes of Robert Byrd, his aversion to desegregation, his assumption that all blacks think as one.  Now Biden's only ploy is COVID.  It's his pathetic last grasp at power.

    A Biden presidency would be the end of America as founded, the end of capitalism, entrepreneurship, the end of the freedom of speech, assembly, and religion.  Everyone can see all that on the Democrat agenda.  Over the last thirty years, the American Democrat party has been captured by the radical, communist left, and too many voters are falling for it.  Forgive them, for they know not what they are supporting: the tyrannical authoritarianism of Orwell's 1984 dystopic vision.

    All Americans should watch Obamagate, the Movie. Viewers will be shocked by the sheer sophomoric mental state of these co-conspirators of the worst kind. They are nothing more than wisdom-compromised bullies who set out to submarine the jock they envied in high schools and so loathe. That Donald Trump has been a profoundly successful president grates on them like the First and Second Amendments enrage them.
    Biden and Harris are both as grindingly anti-freedom and liberty as Antifa and BLM, both organizations they support. They, and the rest of the left, are fueled by rage and a fury at their 2016 loss that cannot be abated. Their contempt for conservatives knows no bounds; they felt entitled to a Clinton victory in 2016. Now they vow there will be violence if Biden is not elected!

    Who are these people? They are small-minded, spoiled children in the bodies of adults. They want things to go their way or else! Nothing reveals this more than Obamagate, the Movie. The Democrat party is in thrall to the likes of the inhabitants of Orwell's Animal Farm. That people as juvenile as Strzok and Page rose to power in what was once the gold standard of American law enforcement is beyond pathetic. That they have gotten away with nearly five years of criminal chicanery is why President Trump must be re-elected. Will the divine intervention that sealed the deal in 2016 be with us still?

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... vieem.html
    "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook." Harry S. Truman

    HAPD
    26K2,5864
    26K2,5864

      Oct 31, 2020#32

      seems better than The Vagina monologues.
      "Give Me A Fast Ship For I Intend To Go In Harm's Way"




      During WWII no other Naval Unit eclipsed the record of the Little Beavers lead by Captain "31 Knot Arleigh Burke." There are Sailors and there are
      DESTROYER SAILORS. Fast sleek they seek out the enemy to engage at point blank range.




      "Neptune was God, Mahan his prophet, and the United States Navy the only true Church"

      LibwithaClue
      21K2,1354
      21K2,1354

        Nov 28, 2020#33

        Justice Is Coming: Carter Page Takes Comey, McCabe, Strzok to Court in $75M Obamagate Lawsuit

        By Tyler O'Neil Nov 27, 2020 10:53 PM ET


        President Obama, followed by outgoing FBI Director Robert Mueller, right, and his choice to succeed Mueller, James Comey, walk to the Rose Garden of the White House on June 21, 2013. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

        On Friday, Carter Page — the former CIA informant whom the FBI nonetheless targeted for warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) — filed an explosive $75 million lawsuit against the key actors in the FISA surveillance scandal known as Spygate or Obamagate. While U.S. Attorney John Durham’s report into this matter is still forthcoming, Page appears to have decided to take matters into his own hands and pursue justice in the courts.

        The lawsuit names a host of defendants, including the federal government of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Justice (DOJ), former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, FBI agent Joe Pientka III, and more. These individuals and others have confessed to compiling and approving four FISA warrants to spy on Page despite numerous errors and omissions — warrants Comey and others said they would not have signed, knowing what they know now.

        “As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ actions, Dr. Page suffered harm. He was falsely portrayed as a traitor to his country, lost at least tens of millions of dollars of business opportunities and future lifetime earning potential, and has suffered and will continue to suffer mental and emotional pain for his lifetime, in addition to other pecuniary harms such as costs, fees, attorneys’ fees and other losses,” the lawsuit alleges.
        Page’s suit cites numerous public statements and reports into Spygate/Obamagate abuses, including the report from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, the analysis from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, parts of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report, and rulings of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). These sources “establish that there is not and never was any evidence that Dr. Page acted in concert with Russia or its agents—because he did not—and that the four FISA warrants to surveil him were unlawful.”

        FISA requires the government to prove probable cause regarding two elements before it can surveil a U.S. citizen: the person is acting on behalf of a foreign power; and the citizen is engaged in either criminal conduct, sabotage, terrorism, using a false identity, or abetting someone engaged in such activities.
        The Real Reason Trump Didn’t Name Obama’s Specific Crime in ‘Obamagate’
        “Since not a single proven fact ever established complicity with Russia involving Dr. Page, there never was probable cause to seek or obtain the FISA Warrants targeting him on this basis,” the lawsuit claims. “The DOJ now assesses, and has formally admitted to the FISC, that with respect to at least the last two warrant applications, ‘if not earlier, there was insufficient predication to establish probable cause to believe that [Dr.] Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power.’

        The suit alleges that the federal government and its agents “committed an abuse of process because they acted with an ulterior motive in using the FISA warrant process to accomplish an end unintended and not permitted by law, to wit, to spy on the Trump presidential campaign by unlawfully invading the privacy of Dr. Page without probable cause.”
        The lawsuit involves no fewer than eight claims against the many defendants. The first four counts involve FISA violations, with one count seeking damages for each of the four FISC surveillance orders against Page. Under FISA, “an aggrieved person… who has been subjected to an electronic surveillance or about whom information obtained by electronic surveillance of such person has been disclosed” can sue the officials responsible for the surveillance.

        The lawsuit also notes that FISA makes it a criminal offense to illegally “engage in electronic surveillance under color of law.” Only the government can prosecute a criminal violation of FISA, but this lawsuit should encourage prosecutions.

        Page’s fifth claim seeks damages for government actions that would be considered injurious under civil law. The Federal Tort Claims Act states that the United States is liable for civil wrongs “in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.”
        The lawsuit also raises a claim under Supreme Court precedent from Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971). In that case, the Court ruled that a plaintiff is entitled to damages from the individual government actors responsible for violating the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures when the defendants act willingly, knowingly, or with a reckless disregard for the truth.
        The final two claims seek a remedy for Page under the federal Privacy Act. That act enables Page to conduct a review and to request a correction to Horowitz’s report, and the lawsuit seeks an injunction to compel the government to update Page’s “individual records.” Page’s final claim seeks damages for the harm the plaintiff suffered when he got branded a traitor, along with court costs and attorneys’ fees.

        Page graduated from the Naval Academy and served in the Navy from 1993 to 1998. He worked at the Council on Foreign Relations and earned his Ph.D. at the University of London in 2012. Page did not hold a high position on the Trump campaign — he served merely as a volunteer member of an informal foreign policy advisory committee and he never met or spoke to then-candidate Trump.
        The FBI and other members of the Obama administration wreaked havoc on Page’s life in order to smear the Trump campaign. Page is right to file this damning lawsuit and he deserves hefty damages. This lawsuit should also open the door for Obamagate prosecutions. It’s long past time these Deep State actors pay for their disgusting abuses of power.

        Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.
        John Durham Also Investigating Clinton Foundation in His Obamagate Probe GOP Senator Subpoenas FBI as Dems Seek to Undermine Obamagate Probe Justice Is Coming: ‘As Many as 16-17’ Obamagate Criminal Referrals Headed to DOJ The Deep State Strikes Back: Former DOJ, FBI Staff Support the Despicable Abuses Against Mike Flynn 


        https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/t ... t-n1179153

          Nov 28, 2020#34

          The biggest disclosures in Michael Flynn’s case
          November 28, 2020 | BPR Wire | Print Article
          • Michael Flynn’s decision in January to withdraw his guilty plea in the special counsel’s investigation set into motion a series of disclosures that cast new light on the FBI investigation of the retired Army general. 
          • President Donald Trump pardoned Flynn on Wednesday, asserting that the FBI should have never investigated his former national security adviser. 
          • In the lead up to the pardon, the FBI and Justice Department turned over documents that showed that the lead FBI agent on the Flynn probe questioned the legitimacy of the investigation. 
          • James Comey told Congress that he was uncertain whether Flynn lied in a White House interview that eventually led to his plea deal. 
          Michael Flynn’s decision earlier this year to withdraw from a plea deal he struck with the special counsel’s office set into motion a series of unprecedented FBI and Justice Department disclosures that has culminated in a presidential pardon for the retired Army general.
          President Donald Trump issued a “full pardon” for Flynn on Wednesday. The White House issued a statement asserting that Flynn “should never have been prosecuted.”

          Flynn pleaded guilty on Dec. 1, 2017 to making false statements to the FBI during an interview at the White House on Jan. 24, 2017, regarding a phone call he had a month earlier with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
          After a series of delays in his case, Flynn made moves earlier this year to withdraw from his plea deal, saying in a court filing on Jan. 29 that did not intentionally lie to the FBI.

          Flynn said he pleaded guilty due to pressure he faced from the special counsel’s office to cooperate in the Russia probe.
          Following Flynn’s about-face, Attorney General William Barr ordered a review of Flynn’s case.
          He appointed Jeffrey Jensen, the U.S. attorney in St. Louis, to review the Justice Department and FBI’s handling of Flynn-related documents. On May 7, the Justice Department filed a motion to withdraw charges against Flynn, citing evidence that prosecutors had withheld from Flynn’s lawyers.

          In a series of court filings, Jensen produced previously withheld documents that detailed FBI and DOJ deliberations about the Flynn case. The documents indicated that FBI officials were not certain whether Flynn intentionally lied to investigators about his contacts with Kislyak.
          Other documents showed FBI officials strategizing how to approach the White House interview with Flynn that yielded his guilty plea.
          Flynn’s lawyers and defenders have said the evidence shows he did not lie to the FBI. His critics have denied that the belated disclosures have exonerated him, or that he deserves a pardon.

          Here are the most significant disclosures in Flynn’s case.
          FBI memo closing counterintelligence investigation of Flynn
          On Jan. 4, 2017, FBI special agent William Barnett, the lead investigator on a counterintelligence investigation of Flynn, issued a memorandum suggesting that the counterintelligence investigation against Flynn be closed.
          The FBI had investigated Flynn and three other Trump advisers since August 2016 on suspicions that they had conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

          Barnett wrote that a review of intelligence community databases and sources “did not yield any information” to suggest that Flynn was a secret Russian agent.
          The investigation against Flynn remained open, though it shifted to a criminal investigation.
          Peter Strzok, who served as deputy chief of FBI counterintelligence, intervened to keep the Flynn investigation going after the bureau obtained a transcript of Flynn’s calls days earlier with Kislyak.

          Other FBI documents show that agents began discussing whether Flynn’s calls violated the Logan Act, an obscure law that prohibits U.S. citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on behalf of the U.S.

          Strzok would conduct the White House interview with Flynn at the center of his case.
          Official questioned goal of Flynn interview

          FBI officials huddled before the White House interview with Flynn to discuss the goals of the meeting, according to a memo discovered by Jensen.
          Bill Priestap, the chief of FBI counterintelligence, wrote in notes just before the interview with Flynn that he wondered whether the FBI’s goal with the White House interview was to “get [Flynn] to lie,” either in order to get him fired or prosecuted.

          “What is our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” wrote Priestap.
          Flynn’s lawyer, Sidney Powell, wrote in a court filing that disclosed the notes that they showed that the FBI “pre-planned a deliberate attack” on Flynn.
          McCabe notes of his phone call with Flynn

          Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director, took notes of his phone call with Flynn setting up the fateful White House interview. The documents were turned over to Flynn’s lawyers in December 2018, well before Jensen began his review of the case.
          McCabe wrote in the notes that he suggested to Flynn that lawyers not be present during the White House interview.
          “I explained that I thought the quickest way to get this done was to have a conversation between [General Flynn] and the agents only,” McCabe wrote.
          Flynn’s defenders have seized on the disclosure as evidence that the FBI targeted Flynn and hoped to get him to lie.

          In a May 8, 2020 interview, Barr, the attorney general, accused the Comey-McCabe FBI of setting a “perjury trap” for Flynn.
          James Comey was unsure whether Flynn lied

          The investigation into whether Flynn lied to the FBI was never an open-and-shut case.
          On March 2, 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey told the House Intelligence Committee that he and others at the FBI were not certain whether Flynn lied during his White House interview.

          “Do you believe that Mr. Flynn lied?” Comey was asked in the interview.
          “I don’t know,” Comey replied. “I think there is an argument to be made that he lied. It is a close one.”
          Lead Flynn investigator cast doubt on counterintelligence probe

          Perhaps the most significant blow to the FBI’s investigation of Flynn came from Barnett, the special agent who led probe of the retired general.
          Barnett told Jensen, the U.S. attorney, in a Sept. 17 interview that he “did not understand the point of the investigation.”
          Barnett also said that the special counsel’s team had a “get Trump” attitude.
          In private FBI messages turned over the Jensen, Barnett wrote to a colleague on Nov. 8, 2016, that he was “so glad” that FBI brass had ordered the closure of the investigation into Flynn.

          https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/11/28 ... se-1000231
          "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook." Harry S. Truman

          SOCOM
          14K2,33910
          14K2,33910

            Dec 04, 2020#35

            John Durham and ex-FBI lawyer duel over prison sentence for FISA email deception
            by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter |
             | December 03, 2020 10:59 PM
             | Updated Dec 04, 2020, 10:15 AM

            Newly appointed special counsel John Durham and fired FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith filed dueling court filings on Thursday, with the former Crossfire Hurricane attorney trying to dodge any jail time and the federal prosecutor asking the court to sentence him to up to six months in prison after he pleaded guilty to FISA email deception.

            Clinesmith, who worked on the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and on the FBI’s Trump-Russia inquiry as well as special counsel Robert Mueller’s team, admitted in August that he falsified a document during the bureau’s efforts to renew Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authority to wiretap Carter Page, who had been a foreign policy adviser to now-President Trump's 2016 campaign. Clinesmith fraudulently edited a CIA email in 2017 to state that Page was “not a source” for the agency when the CIA had told the bureau on multiple occasions that Page had been an “operational contact” for them.

            “As a licensed attorney and an officer of the Court, the defendant took an oath, was bound by professional and ethical obligations, and should have been well-aware of this duty of candor ... His deceptive conduct ... was antithetical to the duty of candor and eroded the FISC’s confidence in the accuracy of all previous FISA applications worked on by the defendant,” Durham wrote on Thursday, adding, “The defendant’s conduct also undermined the integrity of the FISA process and struck at the very core of what the FISC fundamentally relies on in reviewing FISA applications.”
            Durham, who used the title of “special counsel” in the filing, pointed out that Clinesmith's deception "fueled public distrust of the FBI and of the entire FISA program itself.” The special counsel argued the court’s sentence “should send a message that people like the defendant — an attorney in a position of trust who others relied upon — will face serious consequences if they commit crimes that result in material misstatements or omissions to a court.”
            “The government respectfully submits that a sentence of incarceration that is at least between the middle and upper end of the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range is appropriate and warranted,” Durham said. “This case is outside the heartland of typical cases under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 [false statements], and such a sentence would reflect the seriousness of the offense.”  ...

            https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... -deception
            “Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Marines don't have that problem.” – Ronald Reagan

            HAPD
            26K2,5864
            26K2,5864

              Dec 04, 2020#36

              clinesmith needs bubba visits to pay his debt to society. six months for ruining a man and his families life. phuck him, more like 20 years.
              "Give Me A Fast Ship For I Intend To Go In Harm's Way"




              During WWII no other Naval Unit eclipsed the record of the Little Beavers lead by Captain "31 Knot Arleigh Burke." There are Sailors and there are
              DESTROYER SAILORS. Fast sleek they seek out the enemy to engage at point blank range.




              "Neptune was God, Mahan his prophet, and the United States Navy the only true Church"

              LibwithaClue
              21K2,1354
              21K2,1354

                Dec 04, 2020#37


                  8:57 AM - 11 days ago#38

                  "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook." Harry S. Truman

                  Read more posts (-2 remaining)
                  Tapatalk promotion