More Stealing Elections: Iowa Dem Trying to Get House to Overturn Election She Lost

More Stealing Elections: Iowa Dem Trying to Get House to Overturn Election She Lost

1,403748
1,403748

    Dec 22, 2020#1

    More Stealing Elections: Iowa Dem Trying to Get House to Overturn Election She Lost, Declare Her the Winner

    By Nick Arama | Dec 22, 2020 10:00 PM ET

    AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

    Democrats have excoriated President Donald Trump for pursuing his constitutional legal challenges after all kinds of irregularities in the election. “An attack on democracy!” Democrats have screamed.

    On the contrary, it’s exactly the recourse he is afforded according to the process.
    Yet, while Democrats have attacked Trump, they’re pretty silent when it comes to condemning Democrat Rita Hart’s effort to overturn her election defeat in Iowa’s Second District.

    According to Townhall, in Hart’s case, she didn’t challenge the result in a court of law, like Trump. She didn’t legally allege any irregularities in the count. The original count and the recount supported that the Republican Mariennette Miller-Meeks won by six votes and she was certified the winner by the state.

    But now, Hart is asking the House of Representatives to decide the election and overturn the certified result, to get the “result we need.”
    Wild video clip here.@RitaHartIA says she’s having @SpeakerPelosi decide the election result instead of Iowa courts because “there was only one way they could get the result they needed”
    This is as antithetical to democracy as it gets #Ia02
    pic.twitter.com/GC8bLMf7Tt
    — Calvin Moore (@CalvinMoore_) December 10, 2020
    Notice even how the Politico reporter phrases it: “trailing.”
    Rita Hart — who's trailing by 6 votes in her race in Iowa — has officially filed her petition with the House Admin Committee https://t.co/j9HG5mJeKT
    — Sarah Ferris (@sarahnferris) December 22, 2020
    Hart is claiming that there were 22 ballots that were improperly excluded and that other ballots weren’t examined in the recount. But she never raised a challenge to the recount. She said that she wouldn’t raise the issue in the courts, claiming “state law would have required a contest to be decided within days and did not allow for adequate time to examine thousands of ballots.”
    In reality, she likely knew she would lose and decided to bypass that route to a more sure thing: having the Democrats in the House simply declaring her the winner.
    Needless to say, folks in Iowa are more than a bit peeved with her over it.
    Poll: #IA02 voters clearly reject Democrats' election steal scheme https://t.co/6BEQ7p4Vaz pic.twitter.com/22ks7q7liz
    — Guy Benson (@guypbenson) December 16, 2020
    According to Townhall, local newspapers are also chastising Hart, even those who previously endorsed her.
    Des Moines Register Editorial Board spitting venom: https://t.co/Y9ronBl42x pic.twitter.com/ppH6CAXNoL
    — Austin Harris (@AustinHarrisIA) December 22, 2020
    So even if she manages to steal the election, local Iowans are going to look askance at her and the Democrats.
    So what were Democrats saying on the issue? Democratic House Rep. Cindy Axne, the one Iowa Democrat in the House, issued a statement indicating she was supportive of this effort to steal the election. So, the Democratic hypocrisy is out in the open. Why isn’t this an “attack on democracy?”

    https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/12 ... 52-n298952
    “Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons.”― Douglas MacArthur
    "DE OPPRESSOR LIBER" "to liberate the oppressed"

    NYCTPF
    40K3,8849
    40K3,8849

      Dec 23, 2020#2

      thumbnail.jpg (49.82KiB)
      Trump Pence Forever

      bohica9
      146170
      146170

        Dec 23, 2020#3

        What ever happened to accepting the will of the people ?

        bluedevil
        3,806738
        3,806738

          Dec 24, 2020#4

          NYCTPF wrote:
          Dec 23, 2020
          thumbnail.jpg
          I always supported the "you get what you ask for"  theory.  After recent events, I have to wonder if not so many asked for what they got. 

          3014

            Dec 25, 2020#5

            She's probably mad because no one clued her in on the voting machine arrangement.  Or maybe she was just cheap and didn't pay her share.

            Tapatalk promotion