An interesting Bulova I saw yesterday...................

An interesting Bulova I saw yesterday...................

Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:51 pm

December 21st, 2010, 3:20 pm #1

yeah I know............. I'm stupid for taking a camera with me to the Mall so I can shoot pics of watches I see but oh well........
I saw this nice little number yesterday and kind of liked it but the price was too much for it!
I tried finding it on-line and could at best only find ONE place selling it at $179.00 and I thought that was still too much so I'll pass and look for something else!


While I was there I also looked again at the thin dress watch I had posted about earlier and after seeing it yet again....... decided to completely pass on it!
Dont get me wrong as I still thinks it's absolutely gorgeous and the price is right BUT it's WAYyyyyyyyyy too thin for my tastes at 6.3mm thick!
I took a pic of it but for some reason I blurred it but maybe you can still get the overall idea?




Quote
Like
Share

Joined: June 19th, 2009, 6:51 pm

December 21st, 2010, 4:21 pm #2



------------------------------------------

Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:51 pm

December 21st, 2010, 4:39 pm #3

Nothing except this one is uber thin! Just looks a bit strange!
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: April 8th, 2007, 11:50 pm

December 21st, 2010, 6:17 pm #4


------------------------------------------

the bettter...it was cool to have a wafer thin watch.
I used to marvel at how small they could make the movements.
I guess styles have changed and bigger, chunkier watches are the norm.
I'll admit that whenever I put on a really thin watch now
it feels odd.
Last edited by GeorgeRado on December 21st, 2010, 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:51 pm

December 21st, 2010, 6:28 pm #5

they look odd as well!
All I ever wore were wafer thin watches and I remember buying my first Seiko dive watch...... it was the 007 model and it looked like a tuna can on my wrist! It took me forever to get used to it!
I still prefer the somewhat bigger watches (40-42mm) but I like em to be in the 10-11mm thickness range!
About the only BIG dive watch I now prefer is my 6105-8110 and tho it is large it has a nice low profile.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: October 25th, 2005, 9:59 pm

December 21st, 2010, 10:16 pm #6

the bettter...it was cool to have a wafer thin watch.
I used to marvel at how small they could make the movements.
I guess styles have changed and bigger, chunkier watches are the norm.
I'll admit that whenever I put on a really thin watch now
it feels odd.
nt
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: October 25th, 2005, 9:59 pm

December 21st, 2010, 10:18 pm #7

Nothing except this one is uber thin! Just looks a bit strange!
dress watch model on occasions when only basic time is needed hahaha!
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 1st, 2005, 3:51 pm

December 21st, 2010, 11:25 pm #8

nt
it's a shame too as if this watch had been at LEAST 10mm I would have pounced on it!!!
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: June 19th, 2009, 6:51 pm

December 22nd, 2010, 12:38 am #9



------------------------------------------

Quote
Like
Share