Link: Copy link
What you have to remember is Paras probably won a lot of respect by her last 2 head of households. She HAD to win those or she is voted out at both the Final 4 and Final 3 100%. It isnt even a question. That is a competitor. So jurors saying they would have voted Kaela really goes out the window in this case since jurors now have a new scenario where Paras beats her way to the end unexpectedly.survivorgirl22 wrote:This is my question here. I wanted Kaela to win but I’m a believer whoever wins deserves it and never like bitter jury claims.That said I listened to several podcasts after Johnny/Olivia/Ali were evicted where they excitedly said they wanted to vote for Kaela. I’m not mad Paras won. I’m annoyed the vote was 6-1 and not 4-3. That means people were legit swayed by Maddy’s crazy logic or production.Zuzuspetals wrote:Funny that some of the jurors (Johnny, Ali, Liv) who apparently didn't like Kaela had no hesitation in naming Kaela as their vote recipient (if she made F2) in their post-eviction interviews ...
She beats Will IMO. That is the only person she beats of the Final 5, maybe of the whole jury phase. I really cant see Will winning the game vs anyone.bbcanfan20 wrote: Kaela wasn't winning this game. If we can pinpoint when she lost, it would be the minute jury started. If it was Derek vs Kaela, then she would also lose 6-1, Johnny being the only one to vote for her, only because he hates Derek.