Is Donnie and Ken just a Jehovah's Witness in Disguise?

Bill
Bill

January 4th, 2017, 7:04 pm #11

Thanks! I always knew that you were a QUACK doctor!
And I always knew that you were a senile old reprobate! LOL
Quote
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

January 4th, 2017, 7:36 pm #12

You should keep up with me landscaping a new house!

As long as I can find the coffee pot and the commode I'll be just fine.
Quote
Like
Share

Sarge
Sarge

January 5th, 2017, 1:07 pm #13

Dr. John Bechtle
Adjunct Professor
Degrees:
D.Min., NT Greek Instruction
M.Div., New Testament
Teaches Greek Language

Should John 1:1 be translated, “The Word was God” or “The Word was a god”? Jehovah's Witnesses deny the deity of Christ, and claim that John 1:1 merely calls him “a god,” but not full deity. They rest their case on three facts of Greek grammar: There is no such word as “a” or “an” in Greek, so we sometimes have to add “a” to translate into English, (Acts 28:6). The Greek word used here (theos) has two meanings: usually the supreme God revealed in Scripture, but sometimes lesser beings like the gods of Greek mythology. The Greek word “the” is often attached to the word “God” or theos, but it does not appear in John 1:1. Hiding behind the Witness rendering of the verse is an unspoken equation: God + “the” (ho theos) = Jehovah, the Almighty God, God - “the” (theos) = a created being with divine qualities. Witnesses claim that the apostle John deliberately omitted a “the” in the final phrase to show the difference between God and the Word. As the New World Translation (p. 775) explains: John's inspired writings and those of his fellow disciples show what the true idea is, namely, the Word or Logos is not God or the God, but is the Son of God, and hence is a god. That is why, at John 1:1,2, the apostle refers to God as the God and to the Word or Logos as a god, to show the difference between the Two. Is this the proper translation? No. The equation underlying the Witness rendering breaks down within a few verses. John 1:18 contains theos twice, without “the” either time. According to Watchtower assumptions, we would expect to translate both as “god” or “a god.” Instead, the New World Translation says “God” the first time and “god” the second time. The context overrules their rule. Why did John choose not to put “the” on the word “God”? To show which word was the subject of the sentence. In English, we can recognize the subject of a sentence by looking at word order. In Greek, we must look at the word endings. John 1:1 is trickier than most verses, because both “God” (theos) and “Word” (logos) have the same ending. The usual way to mark off the subject clearly was to add “the” to the subject and leave it off the direct object. That is precisely what John did here. To conform to standard Greek grammar. E.C. Colwell demonstrated in an article in the Journal of Biblical Literature in 1933 that it was normal practice to omit “the” in this type of sentence. John was simply using good grammar, and making it clear that he intended to say, “The Word was God” rather than “God was the Word,” a statement with some theological drawbacks. John constructed his sentence in the one way that would preserve proper grammar and sound doctrine, declaring that “the Word was God.” Author: Dr. John Bechtle

Dr. Bechtle is either a Calvinist, a Trinity teacher, or what Donnie?

But Donnie and Ken, the REAL question is.....are you two just a closet Jehovah Witness?


Take your time boys. He is probably from a denominational background, or a Calvinist, or with Trinity background. One thing I know is this. Donnie, he put your work to and end. You are the ONE who has not been truthful.
Ken is in the rear, huffing and puffing.




Quote
Share

Sarge
Sarge

January 5th, 2017, 2:23 pm #14

Yes, the duck is the doctor's mascot.
Bill, you are a real gentleman to let Script degrade you with the "anal" comment.

Perhaps, a GRAMMAR thread is needed? Ze has been flaunting "Its" knowledge of adjectives and verbs.

Somebody needs to give Script a good spanking. Bill, you are the MAN that can get it done.

Donnie, what do you think?
Quote
Share

Scripture
Scripture

January 5th, 2017, 4:56 pm #15

Sargeant,

You need to look "anal" up in the dictionary.

If anybody can appreciate the word, surely a doctor can. . . .
Quote
Share

Bill
Bill

January 5th, 2017, 5:00 pm #16


Bill, you are a real gentleman to let Script degrade you with the "anal" comment.

Perhaps, a GRAMMAR thread is needed? Ze has been flaunting "Its" knowledge of adjectives and verbs.

Somebody needs to give Script a good spanking. Bill, you are the MAN that can get it done.

Donnie, what do you think?
Since Script doesn't seem to be able to do much more than hurl insults, I don't see much point in bothering with him.
Quote
Share

Scripture
Scripture

January 5th, 2017, 8:06 pm #17

Ken is in the rear, huffing and puffing.



Just trying to level playing field by giving CM critics some sucker punches!
Quote
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

January 5th, 2017, 9:15 pm #18

Ken is in the rear, huffing and puffing.



If God authorized bicycles why did He give us cars?
Quote
Like
Share

Bill
Bill

January 5th, 2017, 9:18 pm #19

Just trying to level playing field by giving CM critics some sucker punches!
Those who are unable to withstand criticism of their controversial theology end up hurling insults and sucker punches.
Quote
Share

Scripture
Scripture

January 5th, 2017, 9:49 pm #20

If they weren't suckers then they would not be punched.

If there is a response to this, just label that person as one "who has to have the last word!"
Quote
Share