Contemporary Musical Worship (see David Young: North Boulevard Hijacked)

Anonymous
Anonymous

December 16th, 2004, 7:13 pm #11

Sure.

There's a Stirring

There's a stirring deep within me
Could it be my time has come?
When I see my gracious Savior
face to face when all is done.

Is that His voice I am hearing?
"Come away my precious one"
Is He calling me?
Is He calling me?

I will rise up, I'll rise up
Then I'll bow down, lay my crown,
at His precious, wounded feet.

(repeat)

I will rise up, rise up
Then I'll bow down, lay my crown,
at His precious, wounded feet.

There's a stirring deep within me.
Quote
Share

Ken Sublett
Ken Sublett

December 17th, 2004, 4:24 pm #12

Sure.

There's a Stirring

There's a stirring deep within ME
Could it be MY time has come?
When I see MY gracious Savior
face to FACE when all is done.

Is that His voice I am HEARING?
"Come away MY precious one"
Is He calling ME?
Is He calling ME?

I will rise up, I'll rise up
Then I'll bow down, lay MYcrown,
at His precious, wounded feet.


NO! that is when we GET our crown: that is the CORINTHIAN problem where they thought that they were KINGS now!

I will rise up, rise up
Then I'll bow down, lay MY crown,
at His precious, wounded feet.

There's a STIRRING deep within ME.


STIRRING is what Paul outlawed as PLEASURING in Romans 15 SO THAT we can speak "that which is written" with one MOUTH and one MIND as the only way to GLORIFY God in Christ.

The METHOD IS ODEING which means to excite emotion.

The PURPOSE is called HERESY "using music to LIFT ONE UP to cut their throat as in the sacrificial systems or to TAKE ONE AWAY for one's OWN USE. STIRRING is:

kineô Hermes [false Logos] leading the souls, of a warrior about to attack, 2. remove a thing from its place, meddle with things sacred, disturb, of a wasps'nest, having driven him in headlong flight, incite or stir one up to speak, 2. of persons, to be moved, stirred, ho

kekinêmenos one who is agitated, excited, 3. of dancing, 5. to be disturbed or in rebellion,

That is what YOU are doing to DONNIE except he refuses to be AROUSED or LIFTED UP which meant "to lift one up to cut their throat."

It is NOT about ME and my AROUSED feelings. When FALSE TEACHERS see the WORD being lifted up they, quick as a bunny,

Ac.17:13 But when the Jews of Thessalonica had knowledge that the word of God was preached of Paul at Berea, they came thither also, and stirred up the people.

Stirred here is:

Saleuo (g4531) sal-yoo'-o; from 4535; to waver, i.e. agitate, rock, topple or (by impl.) destroy; fig. to disturb, incite: - move, shake (together), which can [-not] be shaken, stir up.

It matters NOT IN THE LEAST whether the TREMBLING is created with a human TEAM or a brass tube:

Salpiqc (g4536) sal'-pinx; perh. from 4535 (through the idea of quavering or reverberation): a trumpet: - trump (- et).

GOD may be LIFTING you up to CARRY YOU AWAY:

Heb.12:26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.

Heb.12:27 And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken [stirred], as of things that are MADE, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.

Heb 12:28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which CANNOT be MOVED, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with REVERENCE and godly FEAR. Remember Nadab and Abihu which the STIRRERS love to make fun of? Well, here is what Paul thinks of them.

Heb 12:29
This STIRRING is trembling for the wrath comming upon the DELIBERATE SOWERS OF DISCORD as they play with themselves. Jesus provided the example of not PLEASURING or "stirring up" Himself of those who WORSHIPPED Him by listenng to what HE had to teach them. Paul issued a direct command in Romans 15, Eph 5 and Col 3. Not getting DRUNK to stir yourself to singing also meant 'INTOXICATED ON PASSION AND PRIDE.' The totality of church history either OBEYED that direct command or CONFESSED the command when they allowed the PROFESSIONALS to play processionals or interludes but NOT to accompany congregational singing.

Ken
Last edited by Ken.Sublett on October 9th, 2017, 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quote
Share

Jimmy Joe
Jimmy Joe

December 18th, 2004, 2:49 am #13

<font size=3 color=indigo face=Times New Roman>Ann,

I’m assuming that you read music. Are you saying that you are not “so concerned” with the alto part when you’re looking at the screen without music notes and “listening to” the “Praise Team”? If the song is completely new to you and without the music notes, you would have to listen to the Praise Team … … … first, wouldn’t you? Then, as you become familiar with the song, you sing along with progressing confidence until such time that you don’t need to rely on the “Praise Team” anymore … correct?

Personally, I find it easier to learn and remember my part directly from the music notes because I shouldn’t have to listen to someone else first. Reading and singing the words to me are simultaneous or concurrent, i.e., when I’m learning a completely new song. [We can get really “technical” about this matter of learning “music” especially when other parts are involved. But with the “lead” part, the one who leads singing—without the Praise Team—should suffice the need of the congregation. Guess what I just thought? Since the “Worship Leader” (how I detest this man-made designation!) sings the “lead” part, anyway, there is really no need for the soprano singers on the “Praise Team”—is there? Yes? Yes?]

You said, “Over time I have been able to learn the songs better while looking at the screen.” [Does this mean that when you look at the screen, you do not look at your “Worship Leader”? Or, do you look at them alternately? ] I would say that over time, regardless of how the song is learned—via the hymnbook or the screen—one learns the song progressively better each time. The advantage of using the hymnbook or the paperless hymnal is that the music notes are available with or without the presence of the “Praise Team.”

Speaking of some of the “so old” words in hymns that you said “aren’t part of our vocabulary in these times,” were you referring to words such as “Thee, Thou, Thy or Thine,” etc.? If so, I’m sorry, but these words would be my personal preference any day over “you, your or yours”—even if capitalized—in alluding to our Father in heaven. I believe reverence and awe should be primary in our use of words in songs and in the manner that we sing these songs. I would avoid disrespecting my Creator as my “buddy” or “buddy-daddy,” etc., which seems so commonplace in our prayers and songs, especially in those non-scripture-based songs written by secular authors. If you meant other words that are not so modern (e.g., “ebon pinion”—perhaps?), would it be that much trouble to look up and learn their definitions? There really aren’t that many and, therefore, should be no reason to trash the “hymns” in order to embrace the contemporary “praise” songs. Don’t get me wrong. There are certain scripture-based contemporary songs that would be considered hymns.

“As for a praise team,” I must honestly say that as much as I despise the exclusiveness of the terminology, their efforts in helping teach new songs would not be against God’s will—but not beyond that, though. Of course, that’s the main excuse that the “Change Movement” advocates have in employing the services of the team. But there are other implications. The “Praise Team” is essentially a “Church of Christ Choir” in disguise—however you slice it. The “choir” would have such a negative impact in churches of Christ, but the “Praise Team” is a little fuzzy, deceptive concept—and the same churches would not likely question such a scheme. Why can’t the Lord be satisfied with simple congregational singing when/once someone leads or starts it?

I would not question the task of the praise team members not going beyond helping others learn new songs. But even at that, the “team” is not necessary because songs that are new will have to be learned gradually anyhow, and the one leading singing—and it does not take a “Worship Leader” to accomplish this—is already there to help others learn.

The key question is—Are ALL the 12-18 “praise” songs that are sung in the entire assembly period being learned? I don’t think so!!!!! I really don’t think so. Therefore, that’s hardly what you would call teaching others all the songs. While the “Praise Team” members honestly and sincerely believe in their type of “ministry” or “mission,” I and many others honestly and sincerely question the “performance” aspect. I wouldn’t expound on this issue at this time except for the fact that when microphones are used and applause follows, performance obviously becomes the name of the game. And you’re exactly right about their “talents”—that’s easily proven when they’re being listened to.

Actually, we ought to look at the big picture. Do you envision the early New Testament Christians having a great and wonderful “worship service” with a wonderfully choreographed “corporate musical worship” program with [what did the apostles call them?]—the “Worship Leader” and his/her “Praise Team”? Or do you envision the early New Testament Christians meeting in the synagogues or in houses with their minds directed upon the study of God’s Word; commemorating Jesus’ sacrifice, death and burial via the Lord’s Supper; and giving to help the needy? That they ... letting “the word of Christ dwell in [them] richly, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs” (Col. 3:16)?

Donnie </font>
Please, let's continue with envisioning the first century Christians, especially the part about giving to the needy. If one is to worship as the first Christians, should one not try to live accordingly. There always seems to be a stopping point at Acts 2:38. Let us not skip over Acts 2:44,45. In todays world living as the first Christians would be classified as Socalism or even Communism. However, these verses do prove true unity and being of one mind.
Quote
Share

Donnie Cruz
Donnie Cruz

December 19th, 2004, 9:05 am #14

<font size=3 color=blue face=Times New Roman>Amen, Jimmy Joe. It is not about “musical worship.” It is not about being constantly reminded of and soliciting millions of dollars to pay the indebtedness incurred during the construction of “worship-and-entertainment centers.” It is about “giving to the needy” that is part of Christian living and service. The following passages support this type of Christian service—not lip service … as in “musical worship service”:

Romans 15:26,27—“But now I go unto Jerusalem to minister unto the saints. For it hath pleased them of Macedonia and Achaia to make a certain contribution for the poor saints which are at Jerusalem.”

II Cor. 9 speaks of “ministering to the saints” … that he “which soweth sparingly shall reap also sparingly; and he which soweth bountifully shall reap also bountifully” … that “every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver” … giving “to the poor” … supplying “the want of the saints” … “liberal distribution”.

Donnie </font>
Quote
Share

Donnie Cruz
Donnie Cruz

December 20th, 2004, 7:47 am #15

Sure.

There's a Stirring

There's a stirring deep within me
Could it be my time has come?
When I see my gracious Savior
face to face when all is done.

Is that His voice I am hearing?
"Come away my precious one"
Is He calling me?
Is He calling me?

I will rise up, I'll rise up
Then I'll bow down, lay my crown,
at His precious, wounded feet.

(repeat)

I will rise up, rise up
Then I'll bow down, lay my crown,
at His precious, wounded feet.

There's a stirring deep within me.
<font size=3 color=blue face=Times New Roman>Thanks for posting the words to the song as requested.

I did not find it in “SONGS OF FAITH AND PRAISE,” (Howard Publishing Co, Inc., West Monroe, LA), although this “hymnbook” includes several contemporary musical pieces from Charismatic sources such as “Integrity’s Hosanna! Music / Integrity’s Praise Music” … “Maranatha! Music” … “Hallal Music” … etc.

I did find it in Howard Publishing’s other set of all-contemporary songbook:
  • HALLAL
    SINGER’S WORSHIP SERIES
    VOLUMES 7-12
    A Collection of Contemporary Songs for Praise & Worship
On the back of the book, it says:
  • “Praise and worship music that impacts your life—that is the comment shared time and time again by people whose lives have been touched by the Hallal Singer’s Worship Series. For years, Ken Young and the gifted Hallal Singers [wonder if this group is Keith Lancaster’s Acappella Singers’ business competition, d.c.] have sung and recorded some of today’s most powerful contemporary Christian music. This book includes the songs from … Hallal’s audio recordings. In this format you can have these stirring songs [emph., d.c.] at your fingertips and can learn them as you listen to the recorded series….”
Now, I recall that “There’s a Stirring” is one of those “stirring” songs that Madison’s “Worship Leader” and his “Praise Team” sing, and I have “listened to” them. Please note that anytime there are microphones used in musical concerts in public places or in a church building, there is noise (well, let’s just say … “sound”) domination. Oh, yes, the emotion-driven lead/soprano part dominates especially when she or they are singing the repeated question in “Is He calling me? Is He calling me?” [“me” is a high note and prolonged].

BTW, contemporary “Christian” music is big business—and that is common knowledge. No proof is necessary, but for track listing/audio clips or other titles by Annie Herring, artist/writer of “There’s a Stirring,” here are the following links: Yes, the day of judgment is coming. Yes, “we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ” (2 Cor. 5:10). But I really question “lay[ing] my crown at His wounded feet.” The crown of “rejoicing” (I Thess. 2:19), of righteousness, of life … is a promise to be received by the faithful.
  • “In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began…” (Titus 1:2, KJV)
  • “That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.” [Titus 3:7, KJV]
  • “And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life.” [I John 2:25, KJV]
  • “I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith: [8] Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.” [II Tim. 4:7-8, KJV]
  • “Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.” [James 1:12, KJV]
  • “And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.” [I Peter 5:4, KJV]
  • “…Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. ” [Rev. 2:10, KJV]
Donnie</font>
Quote
Share

Donnie Cruz
Donnie Cruz

January 5th, 2005, 8:02 am #16

I was listening to BBN (Bible Broadcasting Network) radio one day this past summer and heard Dr. Lowell Davey speak on the "Perspective" program. He spoke of the very popular and great hymn, "O Worship the King," and contrasted it with another song that reflects the contemporary music worship culture of the last few decades. He further commented, "I think it's going to be pretty relevant to where you may find yourself to be or where the church is basically headed today." He went on to recite the words to this song and pointed out that many of the contemporary music pieces are written and promoted by unsaved people and secular corporations basically producing the music for our church today. [If time permits later on, I would like to present a transcribed segment of this program.]

To have a better appreciation for the message that the song conveys, he suggested singing it to the tune of "O Worship the King." So, here's the hymn first. Would you please sing it meaningfully? And remember the tune! (I have researched online to find a copy of the other song that Dr. Davey alluded to above. Guess what I found? You'll see it later on. But, first, the hymn.)
O worship the King, all glorious above
And gratefully sing His wonderful love;
Our shield and Defender, the Ancient of Days,
Pavilioned in splendor and girded with praise.

Thy bountiful care, what tongue can recite?
It breathes in the air, it shines in the light:
It streams from the hills, it descends to the plain,
And sweetly distills in the dew and the rain.

Frail children of dust, and feeble as frail,
In Thee do we trust, nor find Thee to fail;
Thy mercies how tender! How firm to the end!
Our Maker, Defender, Redeemer, and Friend!
Now, here: http://www.bbnradio.org/bbn/bbs/read.as ... e=BBN_News

Author: Jeff Apthorp
Date:9/7/2004 4:33:09 PM
Have your hymn books been replaced?

Recently Dr. Lowell Davey shared the following thought provoking words on the Perspective program. They read best set to the tune of the Hymn "O Worship The King".

O worship the slides, projected above.
Theyre taking the place, of hymnbooks we love.
We cant read ahead, and we cant read the score,
We cant harmonize and sing parts anymore.

O tell of His love, but dont mention sin.
We cannot offend, or crowds wont come in.
Forgetting His wrath, and His anger dont sing.
Were gracious and kind, and non-threatening.

Our bountiful hymns, in which we delight,
Are stogey and old, the words they arent right.
We cant memorize them, dont know what they mean.
Their authors are dead, and their length is obscene.

Frail children of NOW, we sing what we can,
Our culture has givn, a short attention span,
Well sing and repeat the Ad infinitum,
While making their writers a neat tidy sum.
___________________________
Donnie


====================
[color=#FF0000" size="3" face="times]Changed to the original, intended title: "Contemporary Musical Worship"[/color] [d.c.]
<font size=3 face=Times New Roman>In “What Happened This Week Thread” (12/22/03), I posted an article concerning “The Paperless Hymnal: Bridging the Gap.” I presented in it my personal observation that the “musical worship program” on that particular Sunday was less choreographed and that there was also less rhythmic/programmed handclapping during singing—which translates to less annoyance and turbulence.

I also offered a few suggestions to the one who substituted for Mr. Keith Lancaster, the “worship leader” on “sabbatical” leave [?] for several months straight, to making “musical worship” less musical and more Word-oriented. At the same time, I presented a reminder to those in leadership that the “assembly of the saints” is really a “school of the Bible”—meaning that it is Word-centered, as it was in apostolic/New Testament times. The preaching/teaching of God’s word was the main focus, as well as commemorating the suffering and death of Christ for our sins.

The epistle to the Colossians states: <font color=red>“Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.” </font> Singing is infrequently mentioned in the New Testament, as you may be aware. In this passage, the key element is the word of Christ dwelling in us. The teaching and admonishing are the key tasks when there is “togetherness” (as implied in the “one another” phraseology). Since it is apparent that these key tasks can be accomplished verbally (by speaking), this passage suggests that singing is also an avenue by which this can be accomplished. Singing is not even a command (as in the saints “must sing at every gathering”), but it can occur. And it certainly can occur as frequently as every time there is a gathering. In this gathering situation, however, “MUSIC” or musical programming to excellence should not be the motive or purpose for the gathering. Is it wrong to sing all praises? No, but it does not have to be all praises. [To me, praising is more of an individual activity, actually, rather than congregational.] And it is not any better when the selection of “praise” songs is carelessly made to satisfy the emotions and feelings of a limited group of people and to the exclusion of others.

My suggestions were intended to discourage solo performances and for others to be a little more sensitive to those people who are offended by being “sung to” … offended by the o-o-o-o-o and other unintelligible sounds that are apparently intended to simulate musical instrumentation. An “upbeat” song has its own place, but very loud rhythmic clapping has no reverential value when “Jehovah” or “our Father” or “holy, holy, holy” is expressed in a hymn—certainly not in singing “Hallowed Be Thy Name” or “Let Us Worship the Father” [with clap-clap … clap-clap-clap].

Finally, I suggested “The Paperless Hymnal.” By the way, this allows projection of the lyrics and music notes onto the screen. There are 500 hymns and new songs in 4 volumes . We need some acceptable balance in the selection between great hymns of the past and the singy-clappy choruses and “praise” songs of the post-modern era. [Is anyone wondering why “praise” is not mentioned in “psalms and hymns and spiritual songs”?] Surely, the church can afford a one-time charge of $500.00 for “UNITY’S SAKE”—everyone knows what this means. The address is: QUOTED FROM AN E-MAIL: [[[[[<font color=indigo>…I am troubled by the innovations, because they seem mostly to lean toward entertainment and behavior that I grew up associating with Pentecostal orgiastic "worship services." I quit going to Tulsa due to this. ...</font>]]]]]

Donnie </font>
Quote
Share

David Straughn
David Straughn

March 23rd, 2005, 4:53 am #17

I was listening to BBN (Bible Broadcasting Network) radio one day this past summer and heard Dr. Lowell Davey speak on the "Perspective" program. He spoke of the very popular and great hymn, "O Worship the King," and contrasted it with another song that reflects the contemporary music worship culture of the last few decades. He further commented, "I think it's going to be pretty relevant to where you may find yourself to be or where the church is basically headed today." He went on to recite the words to this song and pointed out that many of the contemporary music pieces are written and promoted by unsaved people and secular corporations basically producing the music for our church today. [If time permits later on, I would like to present a transcribed segment of this program.]

To have a better appreciation for the message that the song conveys, he suggested singing it to the tune of "O Worship the King." So, here's the hymn first. Would you please sing it meaningfully? And remember the tune! (I have researched online to find a copy of the other song that Dr. Davey alluded to above. Guess what I found? You'll see it later on. But, first, the hymn.)
O worship the King, all glorious above
And gratefully sing His wonderful love;
Our shield and Defender, the Ancient of Days,
Pavilioned in splendor and girded with praise.

Thy bountiful care, what tongue can recite?
It breathes in the air, it shines in the light:
It streams from the hills, it descends to the plain,
And sweetly distills in the dew and the rain.

Frail children of dust, and feeble as frail,
In Thee do we trust, nor find Thee to fail;
Thy mercies how tender! How firm to the end!
Our Maker, Defender, Redeemer, and Friend!
Now, here: http://www.bbnradio.org/bbn/bbs/read.as ... e=BBN_News

Author: Jeff Apthorp
Date:9/7/2004 4:33:09 PM
Have your hymn books been replaced?

Recently Dr. Lowell Davey shared the following thought provoking words on the Perspective program. They read best set to the tune of the Hymn "O Worship The King".

O worship the slides, projected above.
Theyre taking the place, of hymnbooks we love.
We cant read ahead, and we cant read the score,
We cant harmonize and sing parts anymore.

O tell of His love, but dont mention sin.
We cannot offend, or crowds wont come in.
Forgetting His wrath, and His anger dont sing.
Were gracious and kind, and non-threatening.

Our bountiful hymns, in which we delight,
Are stogey and old, the words they arent right.
We cant memorize them, dont know what they mean.
Their authors are dead, and their length is obscene.

Frail children of NOW, we sing what we can,
Our culture has givn, a short attention span,
Well sing and repeat the Ad infinitum,
While making their writers a neat tidy sum.
___________________________
Donnie


====================
[color=#FF0000" size="3" face="times]Changed to the original, intended title: "Contemporary Musical Worship"[/color] [d.c.]
I have perfected a system of having musical scores of hymns projected through slides. If you have any interest, please check out my website. This system has greatly improved our congregational singing and we do not have a "praise team," don't need any such thing.

www.presentationsofpraise.com

Sincerely,
David Straughn
Quote
Share

Tom
Tom

June 13th, 2017, 9:33 am #18

<font color=indigo>Yes, it is good to point out that a hymnbook is a compilation of “psalms, hymns and spiritual songs” that have been written through the ages. It is also fair to mention that because hymnbooks are man-compiled, some of the songs may not necessarily be worship-material. So, we have the responsibility to select songs that “teach and admonish” according to Colossian 3:16, letting the “word of Christ dwell in you richly.” The whole verse states: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.” (KJV)

In examining the entire New Testament, there is no evidence that music in itself is associated with worship. The only example in which “music” is mentioned is in the story of “the prodigal son” (Luke 15) in which the elder son heard “music and dancing” in celebration. In other words, if music is the primary objective in the gathering of the saints, then, worship is misdirected. This seems to be what’s happening in the “contemporary musical worship” culture—e.g., a good 75% of the 90-minute period is devoted to “musical worship”—the rest of it to the observance of the Lord’s Supper (in which “celebration” is now strongly emphasized) and to the preaching (quite often of watered-down sermons).

Even considering Ephesians 5:19—“Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord”—the major point in singing is communication: “speaking to” or “teaching and admonishing” one another. What? “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly. ”

My point is that the chances are greater that one would find from the hymnbook many more hymns that teach and admonish and are scripture-based than from a compilation of singy-clappy praise and celebration songs of the contemporary culture. I believe that Dr. Davey mentioned “unsaved people” in connection with the volumes of contemporary songs written with little or no scriptural basis and in connection with the “secular corporations” and their business schemes and exploitations. Since BBN has a program that deals with the history of hymns, I am certain that he is very aware that some of the hymns written by “unbelievers” do have scriptural bearing.

Thanks for bringing up “The Paperless Hymnal.” Shouldn’t that silence the hymnbook critics? The projector is a wonderful innovation and should be used without altering God’s message, plan and purpose. When hymns are projected on the screen civilly, there would be no need for the Praise Team “to assist” each Christian in his/her worship to the Father in heaven. Actually, the Praise Team does not have any business performing to Christians or doing the worshipping for Christians. (You said something about how you “find it refreshing to be encouraged to look up….” Personally, I find the “Worship Leader,” his or her “Praise Team,” and the holy big screen distracting—all of them.)

Donnie</font>
Using you own logic - there is no mention in scriptures about a song leader either however we have them for expediency so that all things are done decently and in order. There is no command or instruction to use 1 leader of 4 leaders - that is 1 per each of thee 4 parts. The purpose of the praise team is to assist the congregation by providing them a core of singers to sing with and around thus making for a fuller singing sound. Granted GOD does not need a fuller sound but it is for us to fill our minds and hearts with HIS praises.

The purpose of the Praise team is not holy entertainment either. it is the same logic used to condemn using a choir in worship. There is no difference in a choir, chorus or praise team. Just because choirs and choruses are heavily used in other churches does not mean that we should not use them, It is no different than any aid such as a song book / hymnal which are used by the same logic. I understand the argument that PTs and choirs will keep others from singing. I dont believe it to be so as we join in singing with their leadership.

I will state that from time to time there may be a song requested to assist in the sermon where the PT can singing it to the congregation so they can hear and learn, But this is not the norm.

I also understand that PTs may not be for everyone out of personal belief and preference cause that's the way it has always been done and thats perfectly ok.

Bottom line - there is no command to do it one way or the other. When we argue one way or the other and try to foster it upon people where they dont want it then it is wrong. I am familiar with Lowell Davey and listen to the BBN when I can. I dont believe he is against new songs because BBN plays them as well as old ones. Many in our brother hood are now arranging contemporary christian music in a capella for our use, These songs are wonderful and we can sing them, However we can sing the old ones as well and sometimes they are combined.

Now as to what happened at Madison - I was there and it is not up to you to noise abroad your opinion and was dirty linen in public thus sowing seeds of discord. This is all I have to say on this matter. Dr Ira would have ended it with " you cant win a pukeing contest with a buzzard and if he had been at the helm-none of this would have happened.
Quote
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

June 13th, 2017, 3:50 pm #19

The command is always to SPEAK that which is written for our LEARNING. Or Teach and Admonish one another. The operative words are always SPEAK or READ. Vocal or instrumental rejoicing was outlawed for the Church of Christ (the ROCK) in the wilderness because the Driving Purpose would be to silence the word of God.

Quote
Like
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

August 15th, 2017, 4:15 pm #20

I was listening to BBN (Bible Broadcasting Network) radio one day this past summer and heard Dr. Lowell Davey speak on the "Perspective" program. He spoke of the very popular and great hymn, "O Worship the King," and contrasted it with another song that reflects the contemporary music worship culture of the last few decades. He further commented, "I think it's going to be pretty relevant to where you may find yourself to be or where the church is basically headed today." He went on to recite the words to this song and pointed out that many of the contemporary music pieces are written and promoted by unsaved people and secular corporations basically producing the music for our church today. [If time permits later on, I would like to present a transcribed segment of this program.]

To have a better appreciation for the message that the song conveys, he suggested singing it to the tune of "O Worship the King." So, here's the hymn first. Would you please sing it meaningfully? And remember the tune! (I have researched online to find a copy of the other song that Dr. Davey alluded to above. Guess what I found? You'll see it later on. But, first, the hymn.)
O worship the King, all glorious above
And gratefully sing His wonderful love;
Our shield and Defender, the Ancient of Days,
Pavilioned in splendor and girded with praise.

Thy bountiful care, what tongue can recite?
It breathes in the air, it shines in the light:
It streams from the hills, it descends to the plain,
And sweetly distills in the dew and the rain.

Frail children of dust, and feeble as frail,
In Thee do we trust, nor find Thee to fail;
Thy mercies how tender! How firm to the end!
Our Maker, Defender, Redeemer, and Friend!
Now, here: http://www.bbnradio.org/bbn/bbs/read.as ... e=BBN_News

Author: Jeff Apthorp
Date:9/7/2004 4:33:09 PM
Have your hymn books been replaced?

Recently Dr. Lowell Davey shared the following thought provoking words on the Perspective program. They read best set to the tune of the Hymn "O Worship The King".

O worship the slides, projected above.
Theyre taking the place, of hymnbooks we love.
We cant read ahead, and we cant read the score,
We cant harmonize and sing parts anymore.

O tell of His love, but dont mention sin.
We cannot offend, or crowds wont come in.
Forgetting His wrath, and His anger dont sing.
Were gracious and kind, and non-threatening.

Our bountiful hymns, in which we delight,
Are stogey and old, the words they arent right.
We cant memorize them, dont know what they mean.
Their authors are dead, and their length is obscene.

Frail children of NOW, we sing what we can,
Our culture has givn, a short attention span,
Well sing and repeat the Ad infinitum,
While making their writers a neat tidy sum.
___________________________
Donnie


====================
[color=#FF0000" size="3" face="times]Changed to the original, intended title: "Contemporary Musical Worship"[/color] [d.c.]
Tom has recently REVIVED The Death-Dealing Musical Worship Team.

Using you own logic - there is no mention in scriptures about a song leader either however we have them for expediency so that all things are done decently and in order. There is no command or instruction to use 1 leader of 4 leaders - that is 1 per each of thee 4 parts.

The purpose of the praise team is to assist the congregation
by providing them a core of singers to sing with and around
thus making for a fuller singing sound.

Granted GOD does not need a fuller sound but it is for us to fill our minds and hearts with HIS praises.


Praise singers BELIEVE that they can do that. David Young says that the SPIRIT comes as a result of repeating phrases over and over but Scripture and recorded history calls that a Laded Burden, sorcery or witchcraft.

In truth, Paul delivers the Spirit or WORD of God by SPEAKING which is the opposite of singing.

Bottom line - there is no command to do it one way or the other.


Jesus and Paul said that SPEAKING that which is written for our LEARNING is the PATTERN.

When we argue one way or the other and try to foster it upon people where they dont want it then it is wrong. I am familiar with Lowell Davey and listen to the BBN when I can. I dont believe he is against new songs because BBN plays them as well as old ones. Many in our brother hood are now arranging contemporary christian music in a capella for our use, These songs are wonderful and we can sing them, However we can sing the old ones as well and sometimes they are combined.

Now as to what happened at Madison - I was there and it is not up to you to noise abroad your opinion and was dirty linen in public thus sowing seeds of discord. This is all I have to say on this matter. Dr Ira would have ended it with " you cant win a pukeing contest with a buzzard and if he had been at the helm-none of this would have happened.


David Young has followed the Madison use of PARASITES performing worship IN THE FLESH by body worship. David is a noted "doctor of the law" and Jesus would say that he IS predestined to take away the key to knowledge. Jesus has John warn about the rise of the old Babylon Mother of harlots: she uses lusted after fruits as speakers, singers, instrument players, grinders pointing to the harlot who could be found by her "piping sound."

He preached on Ephesians 5 Sunday on A New Day and proves that God will not let Him speak the truth. Stand by for reviews because He and They won't respond to e-mails.

More will follow shortly and if you know anyone at North Boulevard, Paul said that the cunning craftsmen or Sophists meaning preachers, singers or instrument players are marked as LYING IN WAIT TO DECEIVE.
Quote
Like
Share