Any One We Know?

Any One We Know?

GCMER
GCMER

September 19th, 2016, 1:41 am #1





Hillary of course!
Quote
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

September 19th, 2016, 2:31 am #2

Jealous?

Hmmm! looks like my last three preachers. I invested in their plan and they just Made-Off. Maybe one of those three ugly graces will cover them.

As the scholars say, we live in the postmodern age. You haven't finished your required Phd in Ministry of Lying.

Prov. 23:23 Buy the truth, and sell it not; also wisdom, and instruction, and understanding.


No buying of a "praise leader?" How about a set of Voodoo drums like one of my last "investment advisers"?

I believe that if you SELL something in the name of God it WILL NOT BE TRUTH. The highest priced ones hope for GRACE by DENYING the Word, Logos as Regulative Principle. Because Jesus spoke the LOGOS that is defined as BEING ANTI-CHRIST. Not to worry they say "there ain't no command which says 'thou shalt not be an ANTI-Christ" as in the trinity beyond ONE GOD the Father and ONE SON, the Man Jesus of Nazareth.

Back in the pre-post-civilized world the SOPHISTS were obligated to TEACH others what they knew without charge. The greatest fall was when sophists began selling learning. We should note that in Amos 5-8 and Isaiah 5 the MUSICAL performances caused the little ones to hunger and thirst for the WORD and could never FIND IT. They were SELLING something but it COULD NEVER be breathed by a holy God.

Is. 55:1 Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters,
<font color="#FFFFFF">.....
and he that hath no money;
.....come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come,
.....buy wine and milk without money and without price.
Is. 55:2 Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread?
.....and your labour for that which satisfieth not?
.....HEARKEN diligently unto ME, and eat ye that which is good,
.....and let your soul delight itself in fatness.


If you go to LU they can learn you how to use YOUR imagination to fill in the blanks which God did not supply. God says that the imagination of man is only evil continually. That does not even slow down people who compose SONGS AND SERMONS to say what God would have said if He had attended their Muddy Waters University. The Lucifer Principle is to be lifted up with pride. They cannot grasp what an abomination they are claimging that "a" spirit is forced to speak to them especially if you do 40 days of Lord-Lord saying.

What did they miss in card class, slow ones in the slow group?

Is. 55:8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
.....neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.


A LU type wrote a commentary on Isaiah and simply missed the message about making merchandise of God's Word.

The few chosen confess to belonging to the WAY that is called a SECT: it is the road or pattern very narrow and fools cannot stumble into it.

Is. 55:9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
.....so are my ways higher than your ways,
.....and my thoughts than your thoughts.
Is. 55:10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven,
.....and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth,
.....and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower,
.....and bread to the eater:
Is. 55:11 So shall my WORD be that goeth forth out of MY MOUTH
.....it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please,
.....and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.


John 6:63 It is the SPIRIT that quickeneth;
.....the flesh [yours] profiteth nothing:
.....words that I SPEAK unto you, they are SPIRIT,
.....and they are LIFE.

God speaks PARABLES to the Jewish Clergy because they had no right to know:

Luke 8:11 Now the parable is this: The SEED is the WORD of God.
1Pet. 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible,
.....by the WORD of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.

The Spirit OF Christ in Isaiah 8 says of those who do not SPEAK the Word that THERE IS NO LIGHT IN THEM

God BREATHES out His WORD and that is NOT a person named THE Holy Spirit. If you think that I am lying try to say SPEAK the Word instead of SING the Word. It simply will not come out of your mouth. In Plato's ideal Republic poets and song writers would never be permitted to write TRUE HISTORY because by definition they were not APT enough to "teach that which HAS been taught." Be wary of people who pick a fraction of a verse and then preach about himself: his feet are beginning to glow.

So, don't pick on Hilary unless you have a very short nose.</font>
Last edited by Ken.Sublett on September 19th, 2016, 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 2nd, 2005, 6:45 am

September 20th, 2016, 2:21 am #3




Hillary of course!
[color=#0000FF" size="4" face="times]Hillary "Rodman" Clinton reminds me a progressive church's female "Worship Leader."

She would be the liberal, progressive change agents' choice of a church "pastor" or "deaconess."

Her liberal, progressive view of America (as well as Barack Hussein's) in politics resembles the liberal, progressive view of the church of Jesus Christ in religion.[/color]
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: January 2nd, 2005, 6:45 am

September 24th, 2016, 6:49 pm #4

[color=#0000FF" size="4" face="times]I'm drawing a parallel here between the liberal, progressive CHANGE AGENTS in politics and the liberal, progressive CHANGE AGENTS in churches of Christ.

In politics, we have the current Democratic leaders in the White House (Barack Hussein, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, et al), Hilary Rodman [pictured above], and some RINOs (Republican In Name Only): Mitch McConnell, John Andrew Boehner, et al.

In churches of Christ, we have Max Lucado, Rubel Shelly, Al Maxey, Rick Atchley, Joe Beam, Lynn Anderson, Jeff Walling, Mike Cope, Terry Rush, and Marvin Phillips. There are others.

Let's pray for America and its future. Personally, I would not want an extension (four more years or 8) of Barack Hussein's destructive leadership. Neither would I want the CHANGE AGENTS' takeover of churches of Christ and their being transformed and TRANSITIONED into Community Churches.[/color]
Quote
Like
Share

Stan
Stan

November 9th, 2016, 3:22 am #5

Sir, why do you call the current president of the U.S. by his middle name instead of last?
Quote
Share

Visitor
Visitor

November 9th, 2016, 10:00 am #6



Stan, good work on the "Great Commission" thread. Try not to get overly sensitive on the names around here.

My name is "Rancorousness" but you can call me Rancor. Yes, I am a gamer. See you later!
Quote
Share

Joined: January 2nd, 2005, 6:45 am

November 10th, 2016, 4:17 am #7

Sir, why do you call the current president of the U.S. by his middle name instead of last?
[color=#0000FF" size="4" face="times]Stan,

Great question!

This may not be the real answer from me nor the answer you expect from me, but it is an answer. Many folks are familiar with each of the U.S. presidents' last name, but not with the first name and the middle name. So it was intentional on my part to call the current president by his first name [which is also "Barry"] and his middle name without the last name. Here are the first and middle names of the U.S. presidents [and "Barack Hussein" sounds odd]:

45 Donald John (president-elect)
44 Barack Hussein
43 George Walker
42 William Jefferson
41 George Herbert Walker
40 Ronald Wilson
39 James Earl
38 Gerald Rudolph
37 Richard Milhous
36 Lyndon Baines
35 John Fitzgerald
34 Dwight David
...... and others

Thanks for asking.[/color]
Quote
Like
Share

Dave
Dave

November 10th, 2016, 4:55 pm #8

You continiue to try and change the Word of God to fit your ideaology, yet you call others liberal. You, Donnie, are the liberal, whether you admit to it or not. Did you vote liberal left democrat? For you are certainly a liberal when it comes to following the Word of God and Jesus. You follow what you want to follow, and those things that you don't like, you just simply don't do them.

You still have it all wrong, When you call me a change agent because I stand up for the Word of God, then I am grateful that you do.

Jesus was a change agent, who made a lot of sadducees and pharisees very angry because He didn't fit their bill. He wasn't a traditional Jew. He couldn't be a king and wash others' feet. You hold onto your traditions and I will hold onto the inerrant Word of God and follow His Son, Jesus Christ.




If you still don't know about WHAT I tried to post, but was deleted.....ask Ken.
Quote
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

November 10th, 2016, 4:57 pm #9

[color=#0000FF" size="4" face="times]Stan,

Great question!

This may not be the real answer from me nor the answer you expect from me, but it is an answer. Many folks are familiar with each of the U.S. presidents' last name, but not with the first name and the middle name. So it was intentional on my part to call the current president by his first name [which is also "Barry"] and his middle name without the last name. Here are the first and middle names of the U.S. presidents [and "Barack Hussein" sounds odd]:

45 Donald John (president-elect)
44 Barack Hussein
43 George Walker
42 William Jefferson
41 George Herbert Walker
40 Ronald Wilson
39 James Earl
38 Gerald Rudolph
37 Richard Milhous
36 Lyndon Baines
35 John Fitzgerald
34 Dwight David
...... and others

Thanks for asking.[/color]
Following closely on the "towers shall fall" someone elected the first "swarthy" black muslim named:

Barack Hussein Obama

Before he began showing signs and wonders in high places just to PROVE the fact he used to be

Barry Hussein Obama
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:32 pm

November 10th, 2016, 5:08 pm #10




Hillary of course!
Jesus was a change agent, who made a lot of sadducees and pharisees very angry because He didn't fit their bill. He wasn't a traditional Jew. He couldn't be a king and wash others' feet. You hold onto your traditions and I will hold onto the inerrant Word of God and follow His Son, Jesus Christ.

In face you and the LIBERALS are wrong using the JESUS LOGOS to repudiate His AFFIRMING the Prophecies about Him in Holy Scripture: He defined that as the PROPHETS speaking about Him and other prophecies about HIM. God as the Spirit OF Christ in the prophets defined the future REST both inclusively and exclusively. He didn't ADD a jot to the well-defined Church of Christ. He said that HE spoke only what He heard as God BREATHED (not a person) into Him without METRON or METER. That is why he SPOKE the Word and NEVER ONCE sang anything about the New Covenant.

The New Covenant was the only SPIRITUAL Covenant which God Along made with Abraham. This was the same Spirit or BREATH which was in Jesus Christ.

A True LIBERAL would not hire out his body and a host of religious functionaries which the SCRIPTURES define as Parasites. A liberal would be like Timothy: Paul commanded the evangelist Timothy to WORK so that HE could minister the Agape which was going out to the pick-up points feeding people who went to work WITHOUT ridding on a motorcycle.


Quote
Like
Share