Link: Copy link
O-o-o-k-a-a-a-y, since you are the author of the chart, you must know the "correct" reading of it. If your chart actually means to represent our position to be that baptized infants are considered members of the church on the basis of their baptism, fine. :dontknow:PARoss:19282 wrote:Correctly read it says that the infant baptism position requires baptism for membership and when an infant is baptized s/he becomes a member.
I don't think that's what the chart shows at all. I think the point of the chart has everything to do with theology and little to do with practicality. I think you are attempting to mitigate the significant theological differences between the baptistic v covenant views.PARoss:19288 wrote:The point of the chart is more practical than theological. It just shows that the same elements are involved in both views, though there are variances.