Interesting statement, srstorti! Does it mean you are a witness as well somewhere near that area?
My biggest problem with Lagasse is this:
The plane approached over/south of the Navy Annex. He sits in his car under his roof with the back to the plane.
He drives into the gas station and under the canopy. The plane is still behind him.
He jumps out off his car. The canopy would allow him a very very short glimpse at best - requires that he turn around and get the right direction immediately.
Let's say he saw it!
There is no way that he wouldn't hear it. There is no way that he could have missed the sound of a tremendous explosion. You know, the kitchens shook a mile away.
Nevertheless, Lagasse acts 100% untouched by that event that brought other witnesses some years of nightmares and psychological help.
Two men waiting for Lagasse. They jump into their car when they see him coming. These two cannot see the plane or impact.
While everyone around them hurrying around to see what happened neither Lagasse nor these two men need any glimpse. They just talk. After finishing their talk the two men immediately drive away. Lagasse walks back to his car.
A little later Lagasse calls a number to give an eyewitness account.
He states that he was refueling his car when he saw the plane approaching. (Lie!)
He knows a lot of details: American Airlines, 100ft above ground, 60ft in front of him (the wingspan is 125ft), 400mph, the wind force knocked him into his vehicle...
And so he stood up again and walked over to the waiting guys???
Lagasse: "First thing I did was call our communications and I nearly stated: an aircraft is just flown into the side of the building. I arrived on scene probably 15-20 seconds after impact and went into the renovation construction area where they had a series of trailers. And that is also on this side of the Pentagon just south of where the aircraft hit the building - may be 100 yards - and began helping people out of that area. ..."
Here is the full account:
(Btw it can be downloaded 10 times. Maybe Jeff can link it in a better way.)
15-20 seconds after the impact Lagasse still talking to these guys in the car.
Who are these guys? Some informants in an undercover investigation? No. Lagasse's job wasn't any investigation.
Drugdealers? Lagasse don't look like a dope addict, right?
Intelligence? ...no comment.
Craig Ranke wrote to the "frustrating fraud" website:
Craig Ranke wrote:...we read an email exchange from back in 2003 where Lagasse said he was on the "starboard" side of the plane which destroys the official story. People blew it off thinking he might have confused starboard and port and because it was just one account and it was simply an email.
We talk to the manager of the citgo station in person in 2006 and she tells us about her employee Robert Turcios who saw the plane. SHE told us that Robert saw the plane on the north side and that this has always been his story. We instantly thought about Lagasse's email to d*** Eastman and red flags went off like crazy.
But it was merely an old ambiguous email and a 2nd hand account so it didn't mean much but if they were true it was CORROBORATION and it meant a lot.
So we talk to Robert Turcios and he CONFIRMED that he saw it on the north side.
Now it becomes evidence.
Once I got Turcios' and Lagasse's accounts on video and they both confirmed without a shadow of a doubt that they really for sure both independently saw it on the north side and that Lagasse really did mean he was on the starboard side of the plane when he said it back in 2003.
Now it becomes strong evidence.
It's clear these people are not hazy on this simple fact.
Plus don't forget.......
LAGASSE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SEE THE PLANE THROUGH THE BUILDING ON THE SOUTH SIDE!
That means he would have had to fabricate his entire account.
Now the fact that Brooks ALSO independently and definitively saw the plane on the north side makes it proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Lagasse wrote an email to d*** Eastman? He wrote d*** Eastman what he really saw
When the CIT "investigation" started they involved the Loose Change team.
L-R: Bermas, Rowe, Avery, Pickering, Marquis. Photo by Craig Ranke (app), Arlington VA August 22 2006. word balloons by Marquis.
If you want to hijack the so called Truth Movement then you should do it exactly this way because the film Loose Change was probably one of the strongest influence to normal people to start thinking twice. Shortly after Craig Ranke blew his new knowledge all over the internet.
Craig Ranke wrote:“You see this is EXACTLY why Aldo and I get frustrated with the "movement". Russell Pickering should have freaked out when this video (Citgo surveillance video) was released and used all of his connections to get people to realize how incredibly important it is that the government released data that we KNOW was manipulated and can prove it with simple testimony from the Citgo manager.
This is HUGE! But instead it's ignored and used by Russell, John Farmer, Caustic Logic, and even Dylan Avery to support the government story! This is how bad some people out there want CIT to be wrong and the official story to be right.
So why is Dylan Avery supporting the government story?
The CIT team suspected that the Citgo surveillance video was altered by the FBI.
1) because Robert Turcios did not what he said he did (He is marked with a green arrow in my video.)
2) because one camera view is allegedly missing
http://z15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Chang ... opic=12296
Russell Pickering wrote:
According to the manager of the Citgo who was very kind and informative with us, their video was not actually taken away in minutes as the famous quote has told us. They were evacuated for about two hours from the Citgo and minutes after they reopened the camera was taken. She never viewed the video herself. Her account was interesting as an audio witness. She recalls the rumbling sound and 3 distinct explosions. Merc has a lead on an employee who was outside the station and may place the aircraft for us.
The first day I was detained by the Pentagon police I was able to capture some photos that made it home. The Citgo manager physically took me out under the canopy and showed me the location of the removed camera. It was pointed at pump 2
. My website page on this is in error and will be corrected as time allows (trying to locate the camera with her on the phone originally led to the misunderstanding).
ALL of the cameras are under the canopy. I did not see any that were external. The manager described this one as having had a clear view of the Pentagon wall and quite a bit north as well. You can see where the impact was and the higher angle of the camera that may have captured it.
In other words, the missing camera pointed exactly at the two guys in the car and right in the face of Lagasse when he jumped out of the car.
Intelligence? ...no comment.
So if indeed the video was altered then only the view was taken out. The picture necessarily would have either to replace the missing camera by another one or to rearrange the picture.
A replacement requires a second tape with some additional view. ...makes no sense.
A rearrangement would be obvious for the employees and requires initially a smaller grid of the camera views and a blow up of the original view to fill the screen. Given the timestamps in the picture it appears to be impossible to rearrange the views anyhow. (nice riddle)
Shortly after the meating of CIT and Loose Change in Arlington the interviews with Lagasse and Brooks were recorded.
(Somehow, Lagasse is always some first row witness for the witness telephone, for Eastman, for CIT.)
Lagasse and Brooks claim that they never discussed this before but they are colleagues.
Brooks claims he heard Lagasse's call on the communication.
Both draw the very same (impossible) flight path.
Somehow, there is no reason for Ranke et al to doubt a single word of Lagasse and Brooks. Instead an old cab driver becomes the center of their conspiracy.
They do a video called: Lloyd England ! First Known Accomplice
That cabbie was "knocked out" by
1) taping him secretly saying that he was on the bridge
2) then Ranke told him that the plane wasn't there (don't mention why he believes that the plane wasn't in this location)
3) recording Lloyed England who hardly try to figure out where he possibly was if the plane wasn't there
England knows that he was where the plane was. Ranke interprets his F***ed up video result as prove for an involved and lying cab driver.
...still no doubt on any word Lagasse told him.
That's how you can shock first hand witnesses. They probably don't want to talk again to anyone of the "Truth Movement".
That's how to ridicule the entire "Truth Movement".
That's how to blame Avery a govt asset.
and so on and so on and so on....
All you need is Lagasse and someone in his back.