Humans in California 130,000 Years Ago?

A forum for discussion about the fields of Archaeology and Anthropology - new finds, old finds, theories, etc. We have numerous archaelogists/Anthropologists
and/or students of archaeology/Anthro visiting PaleoPlanet...this is the place for them to intereact, and hopefully provide information to the arm-chair
enthusiasts out there!

Humans in California 130,000 Years Ago?

Nomad1
Registered User
Nomad1
Registered User
Joined: 07 Apr 2016, 04:59

22 Dec 2017, 18:14 #1

http://nomadsurvival.tk/forum/
Reply
Like

Quillsnkiko
Registered User
Quillsnkiko
Registered User
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 08:25

30 Dec 2017, 06:39 #2

That is very interesting....Thanks for posting the link Nomad1 ...Looking forward to more information about that site at a later date. Quills
" You can't stop the waves .... but, you can learn to surf."
Reply
Like

Nomad1
Registered User
Nomad1
Registered User
Joined: 07 Apr 2016, 04:59

01 Jan 2018, 01:40 #3

Makes me wonder if our first nation may be 2nd or 3rd nation instead...
http://nomadsurvival.tk/forum/
Reply
Like

Quillsnkiko
Registered User
Quillsnkiko
Registered User
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 08:25

01 Jan 2018, 03:34 #4

I will bet that most of what we now think to be true of our ancestors will be proved false in the future.....Quills
" You can't stop the waves .... but, you can learn to surf."
Reply
Like

ww
Registered User
ww
Registered User
Joined: 07 Jun 2016, 18:46

01 Jan 2018, 19:45 #5

Agreed, Quills.   Yet....
To dispute Clovis-first by a few thousand years was controversial. Some archaeologists had won begrudging acceptance with a few scattered excavations.
But to propose a site more than 100,000 years older was professional suicide. It would undermine the research and reputations of most archaeologists now studying the New World.
why is it that so many of those who claim to have the scientific mindset, lose their objectivity  making claims about who was first?
Reply
Like

RonRay
Registered User
RonRay
Registered User
Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 05:01

02 Jan 2018, 02:08 #6

ww wrote: Agreed, Quills.   Yet....
To dispute Clovis-first by a few thousand years was controversial. Some archaeologists had won begrudging acceptance with a few scattered excavations.
But to propose a site more than 100,000 years older was professional suicide. It would undermine the research and reputations of most archaeologists now studying the New World.
why is it that so many of those who claim to have the scientific mindset, lose their objectivity  making claims about who was first?
Just look at the lies the Leaky family contrived, just to be "first".
Life is either a daring adventure or nothing. ~ Helen Keller
Reply
Like

Quillsnkiko
Registered User
Quillsnkiko
Registered User
Joined: 22 Jun 2006, 08:25

02 Jan 2018, 05:25 #7

Only time will tell. Books will be rewritten. College courses changed...and it will be found that all the "knowledge" written was wrong....perhaps...perhaps. Only time will tell.....  I hope I am alive to see it....Quills
" You can't stop the waves .... but, you can learn to surf."
Reply
Like