The Christer's Fossil Faced Man

The Christer's Fossil Faced Man

Quantum
Quantum

July 24th, 2012, 10:43 am #1

Man Somehow Frozen in "Cretaceous Period"
Christer found this fossilized head of a man a few years ago in Sweden near Gothenburg. It clearly appears to be the head of a man, with very recognizable features, "immortallized" into stone which its discover believes is flint.

This would pose a problem for current evolutionary and geoligical theories since flint (or any rock for that matter) was supposedly formed tens of millions of years before man evolved.

Of course, it poses no problem for the Bible's version of the creation of man and the universe. In fact, flint according to science is formed from the bodies of billions of little animals and it being sedimentary rock required large quantities of water for its formation. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

SOURCE: Christer's Fossil Man Page
Quote
Share

Hi-Top
Hi-Top

July 26th, 2012, 5:00 pm #2

Yeah, it would pose a problem for scientists.... if the story was true! But it's a story straight out of another one of those pseudo science whacko sites.

I don't think you'll see Christer's fossil faced man published in a respectable scientific journal in our lifetime. And may I ask what respectable museum the famous fossil faced man is being housed in?

LOL
Quote
Share

Lo
Lo

July 27th, 2012, 5:54 am #3

Science is filled with tired theories such as Darwinism that do not fit with the facts. It is solace for the dogmatic secularist. It's interesting how wishful thinking is considered 'scientific'.

How can any modern human with scientific knowledge and common sense deny the fact that you cannot get something from nothing? We have DNA, we have probed into its mysteries, and even termed it as 'code'. If you had ever studied DNA you would change your mind. It is immpossible that dna arose by chance, please, take a look at it before you dismiss the idea of a Creator. FACT and Firm. There are NO transitional fossils, at all. Even Darwin admitted the absense of these fossils would disprove his 'theory', and those fossils found above continually disprove Darwinian Evolution Theory.
Quote
Share

think hard
think hard

July 27th, 2012, 1:26 pm #4

Yeah, it would pose a problem for scientists.... if the story was true! But it's a story straight out of another one of those pseudo science whacko sites.

I don't think you'll see Christer's fossil faced man published in a respectable scientific journal in our lifetime. And may I ask what respectable museum the famous fossil faced man is being housed in?

LOL
"I don't think you'll see Christer's fossil faced man published in a respectable scientific journal in our lifetime. And may I ask what respectable museum the famous fossil faced man is being housed in?"

You mean publish more of those out of place items and put the evolution theory into extinction? Absolutely! They are terrified of these discoveries.

They wont publish them. They will not give it prominence as it runs against their theory.

Evolution is a well-protected and endangered 'species' of a theory.

Quote
Share

passing thru
passing thru

July 28th, 2012, 5:34 am #5

Science is filled with tired theories such as Darwinism that do not fit with the facts. It is solace for the dogmatic secularist. It's interesting how wishful thinking is considered 'scientific'.

How can any modern human with scientific knowledge and common sense deny the fact that you cannot get something from nothing? We have DNA, we have probed into its mysteries, and even termed it as 'code'. If you had ever studied DNA you would change your mind. It is immpossible that dna arose by chance, please, take a look at it before you dismiss the idea of a Creator. FACT and Firm. There are NO transitional fossils, at all. Even Darwin admitted the absense of these fossils would disprove his 'theory', and those fossils found above continually disprove Darwinian Evolution Theory.
I'm quite sure that you, me, and a bunch of the other smartest people on Scape wouldn't understand the physics or chemistry theories enough to explain them in detail to anyone else. You don't seem to have a problem with those scientific theories even though none of us understand them.

It's that damned evolution theory of Darwin that really gets to you. Maybe you've watched a movie of chimpanzee behaviour, saw how horribly alike chimpanzees and humans do things (especially picking lice out of hair!) and you shudder at the thought that we might have a common ancestor. It's too much to bear...... in fact, it makes you downright angry. Emotional.

And then you base your conclusions on your emotions, not on facts.

Please understand that there are heaps of people (in fact, tens of millions of them) who are a lot smarter than you are, even though you may have been dux. Anyone here on pngscape is pretty smart compared to the population as a whole but if you've seen the outside world and been able to meet a lot of people, you'll quickly come to see how many people there are in the world whose analytical abilities are leaps and bounds above anything we here on pngscape are capable of.
Quote
Share

wilz
wilz

July 29th, 2012, 1:37 am #6

"science findings involve more analysis and logic" ?? how does evolution fit into that catogery when there is virtually no analysis and logic put into the theory ? if you read the "origin of species" there are some things Darwin belived about how superior the males mind is the the females ! thats downright silly and sexist just like how it created racism among racial groups. Darwin never used "analysis and logic" in his theory and if he did then it clearly shows how childish he is .

Do you know where Darwin belived humans got there superior intellect from ? he "BELIEVED" (no analysis/logic or evidence here! ) that our male animal ancestors fought over each other for the females that they fought so hard for the females they prefered, it increased there brain power ! seriously is this a kids cartoon director or a scientists here ?? i cant tell.

Quote
Share

Wilz
Wilz

July 29th, 2012, 4:54 am #7

"I don't think you'll see Christer's fossil faced man published in a respectable scientific journal in our lifetime. And may I ask what respectable museum the famous fossil faced man is being housed in?"

You mean publish more of those out of place items and put the evolution theory into extinction? Absolutely! They are terrified of these discoveries.

They wont publish them. They will not give it prominence as it runs against their theory.

Evolution is a well-protected and endangered 'species' of a theory.
"passing through" not all science findings involved logic and analysis.

"Theories" dont follow that procedure. They are the "last bet" that scientists turn to when they dont find any PHYSICAL evidence to support there belief. Thats why we christians are strongly against it, its just a bunch of made up stories disguised in scientific clothing to brain wash the public (and students) that there is not a God .

Thats basically the purpose of atheistic scientists . They aim to attack the very foundation of the bible- GENESIS.

The devil knows that if he is to remove God from the minds of humans, he must attack the very foundation of the bible.

If you want to bring down a sky scraper , all you gotta do is destroy and attack its foundations .

The question is why are they so ANT-CREATIONIST ? why are they attacking only the beginning of the bible- genesis and not any other part of it ????? thats something you should think about ah ? its basically the devil in the back ground using them as puppets. Scientists are doing a good job helping us understand our world but when they chose only to attack Gods word then you must be aware of there hidden agendas ! (removing christianity from schools and replacing it with "humanism"- a form of NEW AGE RELIGION !!!
Quote
Share

Believer
Believer

July 29th, 2012, 10:31 pm #8

Probably at least half or more scientists are believers in a supreme being, no scientist would keep their job being so childish and subjective as tailoring their research specifically to "keep God's word".

You're not a scientist so you wouldn't know these things but unlike me you haven't even bothered to get to know scientists so why would we expect you to be giving accurate information about them?

Others have already given the facts about 'theories' and why science purposely uses theories. Of course you refuse to listen because it would go against your belief. Fortunately science goes wherever the evidence takes it. Any preconceived notions are thrown out the window through peer review and criticism if the evidence doesn't back it up. I don't mean piece of evidence here or there, I mean the majority of the evidence.

If the bulk of evidence supported creation, then that's what the majority of scientists would accept. Unfortunately the 'evidence' for creation put on this board is quickly shot down and any evidence against evolution as a general phenomenon was long ago discounted as being due to faulty experimentation, etc etc.

You're a Christian extremist, a dying breed in civilised countries. Fortunately most Christians who are educated aren't extremist like you and don't treat the Bible literally. That includes all the major Christian churches.
Quote
Share

Modern day nationalist
Modern day nationalist

July 31st, 2012, 12:16 am #9

"passing through" not all science findings involved logic and analysis.

"Theories" dont follow that procedure. They are the "last bet" that scientists turn to when they dont find any PHYSICAL evidence to support there belief. Thats why we christians are strongly against it, its just a bunch of made up stories disguised in scientific clothing to brain wash the public (and students) that there is not a God .

Thats basically the purpose of atheistic scientists . They aim to attack the very foundation of the bible- GENESIS.

The devil knows that if he is to remove God from the minds of humans, he must attack the very foundation of the bible.

If you want to bring down a sky scraper , all you gotta do is destroy and attack its foundations .

The question is why are they so ANT-CREATIONIST ? why are they attacking only the beginning of the bible- genesis and not any other part of it ????? thats something you should think about ah ? its basically the devil in the back ground using them as puppets. Scientists are doing a good job helping us understand our world but when they chose only to attack Gods word then you must be aware of there hidden agendas ! (removing christianity from schools and replacing it with "humanism"- a form of NEW AGE RELIGION !!!
Wilz, i'm afraid your writing shows ignorance about how science works. Stick to your specialty which is to blindly believe the bible & keep science out of your discussions until you become better informed.
Quote
Share

think
think

July 31st, 2012, 11:45 am #10

@ Modern day nationalist

How does science work? You accuse people of being ignorant but you avoid the arguments and discussions raised by Christians here. Where is your argument? Where is your convincing discussion on how that science of yours works? You have offered nothing to the discussions because you have been brainwashed and indoctrinated into believing lies.

Tell us which museum on earth holds the fossils linking molecules to man. Answer: There is none. Not ONE museum can clearly display the molecule to man fossil record. Why? Because it is not there. It is still missing even as Darwin himself feared. It is a lie and we know it.

If you dont know, this is how your type of evolutionary religion works.

They get you indoctrinated from primary school to university with baseless, evolutionary tales which have nothing to do with real science. 'Boys and girls, from nowhere, this whole universe exploded into existence and after millions of years, molecules decided to evolve into fish and then into humans.' If you believe crap like this, you need help, because that rubbish is the product of how trashy evolutionary 'science' works. Institutionalised indoctrination of minds is the worst form of child abuse the planet has seen over the last 150 years.

You are not to ask questions in those religious indoctrination sessions. What is in the textbook is to be taken as gospel. It's frightening how they do it.

You have been indoctrinated with the religion that man emerged from mindless molecules over millions of years. Real evidence and real fossil record cannot support that silly claim which you and millions more have been so misled and brainwashed senseless.

This whole fraud is coming unstuck and evolution is now employing the very method you use against those who detect the lies, ask questions and call them to task. Threats, ridicule and name calling is part of the scientific method (how your science works) to protect their religion, which method you seem fond of using here.

Molecule to man evolution is a dying religion. It is totally useless.
Quote
Share