BOMBS When 1st Plane Hit

Joined: March 31st, 2010, 4:42 am

June 22nd, 2011, 1:50 pm #1

A new compilation of evidence for explosions far below the impact of the first plane:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt8PMLTmcng
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gt8PMLTmcng


Eugene Corley (FEMA Building Performance Assessment Team, BPAT) had it right in 2002 when he said the collapse initiation was core-led. Then came NIST with 16 million US taxpayer dollars to point us all in the wrong direction.

Proof that NIST was wrong in its WTC1 collapse initiation theory is spelled out simply and authoritatively at http://the911forum.freeforums.org ... To think that the official investigation into the North Tower failure FAILED is bad logic. Of course it succeeded, but not in telling the truth of actual cause and effect... Considering all the evidence, NIST LIED.

Jet fuel analysis: http://femr2.ucoz.com/forum/12-11-1
also: http://the911forum.freeforums.org/lobby ... liquid-non... = Not enough fuel spilled down.

Elevators: "There were 99 passenger elevators in each tower, arranged in three vertical zones to move occupants in stages to skylobbies on the 44th and 78th floors. These were arranged as express (generally larger cars that moved at higher speeds) and local elevators in an innovative system first introduced in WTC 1 and WTC 2. There were 8 express elevators from the concourse to the 44th floor and 10 express elevators from the concourse to the 78th floor as well as 24 local elevators per zone, which served groups of floors in those zones. There were seven freight elevators, only one of which served all floors." - NIST NCSTAR 1-1, p.50 ...

Here's a lie for you: "Cars 6 and 50 could have fallen all the way to the pit in the sub-basement level, and car 50 in WTC 1 was reported to have done so." -NIST NCSTAR1-7, p.160 ... Truth? Here: "The emergency brakes caught after 15 or 16 floors." - http://www.usatoday.com/life/sept11/200 ... iths_x.htm (See also http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/ ... lw.00.html : for ARTURO GRIFFITH, WTC SURVIVOR, freight car 50 elevator operator... who heard and felt multiple explosions -- video seen in collection for the first time after NIST FOIA release)
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 31st, 2010, 4:42 am

August 25th, 2011, 4:39 am #2

Read this, people:

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeFor ... 1701709/1/

Thanks, Miragememories and NK-44
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 31st, 2010, 4:42 am

August 26th, 2011, 12:55 am #3

Here's the old NK-44 post archived:
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/cache/Loose ... sions.html

Very interesting is the well-documented fire and damage on floor 22, where the security command center was. Note the basement damage had caused evacuation of the command center in the basement (of WTC 2). These tactical support systems would have helped the firefighting effort... which would have extinguished the reason for the planned implosions.

(ON EDIT: fixed link)
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 31st, 2010, 4:42 am

December 21st, 2011, 1:45 am #4

I made a video compiling evidence from links above (and more) here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMvPHFbxnPM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMvPHFbxnPM
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 31st, 2010, 4:42 am

February 16th, 2012, 3:14 pm #5

Bump.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: June 9th, 2012, 7:34 am

March 20th, 2014, 5:09 am #6

Quote
Like
Share

JFK
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 7:12 pm

March 20th, 2014, 12:57 pm #7

There is one thing not taken into account in the above video.

The speed of sound,
IMHO the crash happened at the moment of the glitch, but the sound took longer to reach the camera.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: March 31st, 2010, 4:42 am

March 21st, 2014, 8:45 am #8

Strange I just happened to check this forum for the first time in a while.

I agree with JFK here, but I still wonder about the Ginny Carr audio.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: June 9th, 2012, 7:34 am

March 22nd, 2014, 3:15 pm #9

JFK wrote:There is one thing not taken into account in the above video.

The speed of sound,
IMHO the crash happened at the moment of the glitch, but the sound took longer to reach the camera.
Well if you look at my comments on the youtube comments section you'll see this.
wrote:This shot appears to be from half way down Park Row. Approx 550 meters direct from the BASE of the North Tower. The shock of the plane hitting would need to travel from the 92nd floor of the tower down 350 meters. So the shock wave would need to travel 900 meters in order to shake the camera through the ground. If you watch the woman in the blue grey top, she stops behind the man's leg when she hears the plane, slightly before the camera shake. the plane would pass on the North side only 450 meters from her position at its nearest point. Whilst it is true that a pressure wave would travel through a solid faster than air it is never twice as fast.
Quote
Like
Share

JFK
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 7:12 pm

March 22nd, 2014, 5:43 pm #10

roscoe wrote:
JFK wrote:There is one thing not taken into account in the above video.

The speed of sound,
IMHO the crash happened at the moment of the glitch, but the sound took longer to reach the camera.
Well if you look at my comments on the youtube comments section you'll see this.
wrote:This shot appears to be from half way down Park Row. Approx 550 meters direct from the BASE of the North Tower. The shock of the plane hitting would need to travel from the 92nd floor of the tower down 350 meters. So the shock wave would need to travel 900 meters in order to shake the camera through the ground. If you watch the woman in the blue grey top, she stops behind the man's leg when she hears the plane, slightly before the camera shake. the plane would pass on the North side only 450 meters from her position at its nearest point. Whilst it is true that a pressure wave would travel through a solid faster than air it is never twice as fast.
My bad, I did not read the youtube comments. :$
Quote
Like
Share