FYI -- SG 2011 overall FET success rate indicated at 57% (success ment)

FYI -- SG 2011 overall FET success rate indicated at 57% (success ment)

Joined: July 29th, 2009, 6:13 pm

July 12th, 2012, 7:14 pm #1

I just got an email from them and I clicked through it. The numbers are not posted in SART yet but SG is citing a 57% FET "pregnancy" rate. I think this is a big jump from less than 50% where I think it has been for a while. Maybe vitrification is finally working for them. I think they started with vitrification in 2009. I did have success with an FET in 2010 but these new numbers appear to be a big increase. I could not find the break-out between donor vs. non-donor for 2011 in what they sent me but their donor FET success rate (from 2009 through 2011) was 35%. Just wanted to mention this in case you are considering SG at this time. I was sucessful in an FET at SG in 2010.

Quote
Like
Share

Joined: August 17th, 2011, 2:17 pm

July 12th, 2012, 9:37 pm #2

Thanks for sharing this. I'll be doing an FET at SG next month, so this is very relevant and interesting to me. Thanks much!
Quote
Like
Share

Kerry
Kerry

July 12th, 2012, 9:49 pm #3

I just got an email from them and I clicked through it. The numbers are not posted in SART yet but SG is citing a 57% FET "pregnancy" rate. I think this is a big jump from less than 50% where I think it has been for a while. Maybe vitrification is finally working for them. I think they started with vitrification in 2009. I did have success with an FET in 2010 but these new numbers appear to be a big increase. I could not find the break-out between donor vs. non-donor for 2011 in what they sent me but their donor FET success rate (from 2009 through 2011) was 35%. Just wanted to mention this in case you are considering SG at this time. I was sucessful in an FET at SG in 2010.
I got the email as well but thanks for sharing...we haven't done a fresh cycle yet so that's first but it's good to know the numbers are improving! I was curious what the fresh donor cycle rates were but that didn't seem to be on there.
Quote
Share

Joined: May 19th, 2012, 4:22 pm

July 13th, 2012, 4:25 am #4

I just got an email from them and I clicked through it. The numbers are not posted in SART yet but SG is citing a 57% FET "pregnancy" rate. I think this is a big jump from less than 50% where I think it has been for a while. Maybe vitrification is finally working for them. I think they started with vitrification in 2009. I did have success with an FET in 2010 but these new numbers appear to be a big increase. I could not find the break-out between donor vs. non-donor for 2011 in what they sent me but their donor FET success rate (from 2009 through 2011) was 35%. Just wanted to mention this in case you are considering SG at this time. I was sucessful in an FET at SG in 2010.
What does this stand for? Where is it located...? thanks.
Quote
Like
Share

Joined: August 17th, 2011, 2:17 pm

July 13th, 2012, 1:25 pm #5

Shady Grove (based in Maryland, near DC) n/t
Quote
Like
Share