Were the so called "experts" wrong?...

Were the so called "experts" wrong?...

Joined: January 1st, 1970, 12:00 am

September 24th, 2010, 4:18 pm #1

"What is a Sasquatch" by MK Davis...The video will demonstrate why the academics were and are wrong...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyUSvpmfcBw
Quote
Like
Share

Nellie
Nellie

September 24th, 2010, 6:01 pm #2

(the filtered picture) of her hairstyle almost resembles a face of a small child. That was the first thing I noticed about the picture.
Quote
Share

chattahoocheebigfoot
chattahoocheebigfoot

September 24th, 2010, 9:24 pm #3

"What is a Sasquatch" by MK Davis...The video will demonstrate why the academics were and are wrong...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyUSvpmfcBw
The bigfoot portray a monsterous appearance. However, as seen with Patty and her clan; they exhibit human-like stature, highly advanced cultural aspects such as the "pony-tail" and Patty definitely isn't some shaggy, BLACK ape looking creature.

They are "HOMINIDS"! OR more simply, an "ancient people" that evolved separately but similarly from our own. Gigantopithicus? No. Ape? No. Monkey? No. Type of "human-like" being? YES.


I bet Patty and others like her can "talk", carry on conversation and have a distinct language too! They most likely have customs, play with their kids, mourne and the like. These are the things that question my own personal ability to carry a gun to hunt one of these beings. Why?

-Jeff
Quote
Share

Joined: January 1st, 1970, 12:00 am

September 24th, 2010, 9:55 pm #4

for discovery only...it may not be popular but as of this date we have nothing to substantiate these creatures exist...tracks can be hoaxed...hairs can be misidentified or contaminated...scat has to be fresh...pictures and video are damn near worthless...the academics associated with this community are not trust worthy...for example...Meldrum endorses an elk cast taken from an elk wallow as being an authentic body cast of a Sasquatch...not only absurd but moronic...

We need a corpse...
Quote
Like
Share

David Holley
David Holley

September 24th, 2010, 11:44 pm #5

I use to have a lot of debates about whether it was right to go out and try to kill one of these creatures. Some considered us "monsters" or murderers.
I never apologize for being pro-kill. I understand something very simple, and Jim and others on this forum and others know this also.

No matter what conclusive and irrefutable proof is presented to the public, the only piece of evidence which can't be explained away is a body. I have no desire to debate anyone whether or not the creature appearing in the Patterson film is human, ape or something else.

My personal belief is that just as there are creatures which will appear more human like, and some which are out and out ape like [these are the majority of what I've encountered] and there is another type which does have a "snout" if you please, and the best description I've ever heard of them from others who have seen them is "monsters".

Our group has stated several times that being pro-kill didn'y mean that we felt like we had to go into the field with blood lust and kill one of these things. We'd just as well hope to run across one which has died of natural causes, or one which was shot by accident during the hunting season [although as large as some of these creatures become, it would take a major high powered rifle to accomplish this].

The bottom line is someone will have to provide a body, and regretably because of those bozo's from Georgia a couple of years ago, it's going to take a detailed scientific study to determine whether the creature lying on the examination table is man or ape.

Something to think about also is although the first specimen taken in the field will be valuable, it's the second and probably the third specimens which will be the most valuable; because they will either prove that all these different creatures are the same, or they'll prove there are "different" bigfoot creatures throughout the country.

Just my thoughts folks. Take care.
Quote
Share

Saskfoot
Saskfoot

September 24th, 2010, 11:50 pm #6

for discovery only...it may not be popular but as of this date we have nothing to substantiate these creatures exist...tracks can be hoaxed...hairs can be misidentified or contaminated...scat has to be fresh...pictures and video are damn near worthless...the academics associated with this community are not trust worthy...for example...Meldrum endorses an elk cast taken from an elk wallow as being an authentic body cast of a Sasquatch...not only absurd but moronic...

We need a corpse...



Well we COULD HAVE HAD between 5 and 7 bodies - two hides at least according to what
we see Titmus skin out and DNA to fall back on if John Green had been an honest person.

Something "horrorific" must have happened to have caused them to lie about how it all went down
for them to elect not to have those bodies looked at....

someone suggested that maybe one of those participants was shot, caught in the crossfire.
Others say the forestry Service shut Green up. How could they shut up a Canadian?

Two Canadians in fact......how does the USA shut up a Canadian?
Maybe through Howard Green?
Quote
Share

chattahoocheebigfoot
chattahoocheebigfoot

September 25th, 2010, 12:15 pm #7

for discovery only...it may not be popular but as of this date we have nothing to substantiate these creatures exist...tracks can be hoaxed...hairs can be misidentified or contaminated...scat has to be fresh...pictures and video are damn near worthless...the academics associated with this community are not trust worthy...for example...Meldrum endorses an elk cast taken from an elk wallow as being an authentic body cast of a Sasquatch...not only absurd but moronic...

We need a corpse...
......one or more will have to end up on an examination table. I have nothing against "pro-killers". In fact, some of them are good friends. It's just that I choose not to do so. No "squashed" toes here.


Jeff
Quote
Share