Is it true?

roger
roger

January 5th, 2018, 12:47 am #21

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
like Tommy Cooper?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONuA3sfKutQ
Reply
Share

a
a

January 5th, 2018, 12:56 am #22

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
lol
Reply
Share

jz
jz

January 5th, 2018, 1:30 pm #23

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
a:>>>>>
Einstein 1905, p.7:
s=b(x-v.t)=b.x'
Viewed moving body expands with its system k (this shrinks system K).
<<<<<<<

This is not an observation of the moving body but the relation between the space
coordinates of systems k and K.
I showed before how a proper observation has to be done.
You and also roger have no idea how to correctly apply special relativity.

Reply
Share

roger
roger

January 5th, 2018, 1:47 pm #24

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
>>>This is not an observation of the moving body but the relation between the space
coordinates of systems k and K.

what is written is vague by Einstein and is no way clear that it means that, with relativists saying contrary things to try to make sense of things. In relativity both k and K might claim to be "stationary", so phrases like "stationary" frame becomes unclear as to what it refers to, and hence what is "moving" also becomes messed up.
Reply
Share

Anonym
Anonym

January 5th, 2018, 6:10 pm #25

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
>>>This is not an observation of the moving body but the relation between the space coordinates of systems k and K.


another shameless lie from a relativist.
according to einstein - a stick is both space and body. and the body is part of space.
Reply
Share

Anonym
Anonym

January 5th, 2018, 6:18 pm #26

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
in einstein 1905, K is always the stationary system and k is always the moving one.
Reply
Share

Anonym
Anonym

January 5th, 2018, 6:26 pm #27

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
and >>>The viewer is in his stationary system K all the time.
Reply
Share

roger
roger

January 5th, 2018, 6:26 pm #28

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
>>>einstein 1905, K is always the stationary system and k is always the moving one.

But that would be in an absolute sense, and relativity abandons that to have relative sense K is moving relative to k, and vice versa.
Reply
Share

roger
roger

January 5th, 2018, 6:28 pm #29

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
>>according to einstein - a stick is both space and body. and the body is part of space.

yes another mess
Reply
Share

Anonym
Anonym

January 5th, 2018, 6:35 pm #30

The Lorentz transformations are misunderstood.

http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journa ... nload/7162
>>But that would be in an absolute sense, and relativity abandons that to have relative sense K is moving relative to k, and vice versa.

this is einstein 1905, still at the ether era. and in an attempt to reduce the mess.
Reply
Share