Leaked Stems/Unheard Vocals Thread

All discussions related to Mariah Carey.
Joined: March 12th, 2001, 10:51 pm

October 13th, 2017, 6:48 pm #641

mcfan wrote:
ShayneFly wrote: TO ALL:

Please note that all download links have been removed. Please do not post download links in the future OR request them on the board.

This also goes for selling tracks or asking to buy tracks.

As per our board rules which can be read in full here the-fomm-rules-and-expectations-of-conduct-t24137.html

**8. Posting links to illegal download sites for any artist is strictly prohibited and will result in an official warning.**

From this point on, please be aware of this. 

Thanks,
The Admin Team.
So, do you have a problem with this rule or not? I'm confused...

IMG_20171014_044325.jpg
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: July 16th, 2008, 1:32 pm

October 13th, 2017, 8:01 pm #642

ShayneFly wrote:
mcfan wrote:
ShayneFly wrote: TO ALL:

Please note that all download links have been removed. Please do not post download links in the future OR request them on the board.

This also goes for selling tracks or asking to buy tracks.

As per our board rules which can be read in full here the-fomm-rules-and-expectations-of-conduct-t24137.html

**8. Posting links to illegal download sites for any artist is strictly prohibited and will result in an official warning.**

From this point on, please be aware of this. 

Thanks,
The Admin Team.
So, do you have a problem with this rule or not? I'm confused...

IMG_20171014_044325.jpg
Girl I just wanted to use a messy gif
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: October 9th, 2017, 12:29 am

October 13th, 2017, 10:47 pm #643

kittykow105 wrote: None of Mariah's songs are available for free download, so by law, providing links to free downloads of multi-tracks is illegal.  Out of all the rules on this board, that one probably makes the most sense.
not true. the Pepsi ringtones were available for free

Reply
Like
Share

Joined: January 23rd, 2008, 11:53 am

October 13th, 2017, 10:50 pm #644

TheMariahCarey wrote:
kittykow105 wrote: None of Mariah's songs are available for free download, so by law, providing links to free downloads of multi-tracks is illegal.  Out of all the rules on this board, that one probably makes the most sense.
not true. the Pepsi ringtones were available for free

After Mariah was paid millions for her Pepsi sponsorship deal and for the purpose of making them available.
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: October 9th, 2017, 12:29 am

October 14th, 2017, 3:36 am #645

matty tat tat wrote:
TheMariahCarey wrote:
kittykow105 wrote: None of Mariah's songs are available for free download, so by law, providing links to free downloads of multi-tracks is illegal.  Out of all the rules on this board, that one probably makes the most sense.
not true. the Pepsi ringtones were available for free

After Mariah was paid millions for her Pepsi sponsorship deal and for the purpose of making them available.
she was also paid a lot to be signed on Virgin Records, should those be free?
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: January 23rd, 2008, 11:53 am

October 14th, 2017, 3:58 am #646

TheMariahCarey wrote:
matty tat tat wrote:
TheMariahCarey wrote: not true. the Pepsi ringtones were available for free

After Mariah was paid millions for her Pepsi sponsorship deal and for the purpose of making them available.
she was also paid a lot to be signed on Virgin Records, should those be free?
No but the point was was that releasing an album or single via record label is done with the intent of selling each individual copy and the necessary parties receive ongoing royalties etc (and yes upfront costs) but the business model is to put out a product, sell it, and be rewarded with royalties for as long as the product exists. And because it’s rare in this digital age for albums and singles to be made out of print, the stem packs / master recording are still worth money, valuable to the stakeholders, and their financial future haven’t been exhausted.

The Pepsi deal was probably an entirely different business model and contract. I don’t believe the ringtones were ever released for sale like on iTunes and even if they were they’re effectively “out of print” so the artist, nor Pepsi, the distributor, co-writers etc still have an active stake in them so sharing them around doesn’t impede on any due payments and thus wouldn’t warrant such an intervention from the mods.

That was my point.
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: October 9th, 2017, 12:29 am

October 14th, 2017, 12:34 pm #647

matty tat tat wrote:
TheMariahCarey wrote:
matty tat tat wrote:

After Mariah was paid millions for her Pepsi sponsorship deal and for the purpose of making them available.
she was also paid a lot to be signed on Virgin Records, should those be free?
No but the point was was that releasing an album or single via record label is done with the intent of selling each individual copy and the necessary parties receive ongoing royalties etc (and yes upfront costs) but the business model is to put out a product, sell it, and be rewarded with royalties for as long as the product exists. And because it’s rare in this digital age for albums and singles to be made out of print, the stem packs / master recording are still worth money, valuable to the stakeholders, and their financial future haven’t been exhausted.

The Pepsi deal was probably an entirely different business model and contract. I don’t believe the ringtones were ever released for sale like on iTunes and even if they were they’re effectively “out of print” so the artist, nor Pepsi, the distributor, co-writers etc still have an active stake in them so sharing them around doesn’t impede on any due payments and thus wouldn’t warrant such an intervention from the mods.

That was my point.
it was a joke tho sis. i know it's different...................
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: January 23rd, 2008, 11:53 am

October 14th, 2017, 12:55 pm #648

TheMariahCarey wrote:
matty tat tat wrote:
TheMariahCarey wrote: she was also paid a lot to be signed on Virgin Records, should those be free?
No but the point was was that releasing an album or single via record label is done with the intent of selling each individual copy and the necessary parties receive ongoing royalties etc (and yes upfront costs) but the business model is to put out a product, sell it, and be rewarded with royalties for as long as the product exists. And because it’s rare in this digital age for albums and singles to be made out of print, the stem packs / master recording are still worth money, valuable to the stakeholders, and their financial future haven’t been exhausted.

The Pepsi deal was probably an entirely different business model and contract. I don’t believe the ringtones were ever released for sale like on iTunes and even if they were they’re effectively “out of print” so the artist, nor Pepsi, the distributor, co-writers etc still have an active stake in them so sharing them around doesn’t impede on any due payments and thus wouldn’t warrant such an intervention from the mods.

That was my point.
it was a joke tho sis. i know it's different...................
Yeah a lot of people 'joke' in these situations.
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: October 9th, 2017, 12:29 am

October 14th, 2017, 1:29 pm #649

matty tat tat wrote:
TheMariahCarey wrote:
matty tat tat wrote:

No but the point was was that releasing an album or single via record label is done with the intent of selling each individual copy and the necessary parties receive ongoing royalties etc (and yes upfront costs) but the business model is to put out a product, sell it, and be rewarded with royalties for as long as the product exists. And because it’s rare in this digital age for albums and singles to be made out of print, the stem packs / master recording are still worth money, valuable to the stakeholders, and their financial future haven’t been exhausted.

The Pepsi deal was probably an entirely different business model and contract. I don’t believe the ringtones were ever released for sale like on iTunes and even if they were they’re effectively “out of print” so the artist, nor Pepsi, the distributor, co-writers etc still have an active stake in them so sharing them around doesn’t impede on any due payments and thus wouldn’t warrant such an intervention from the mods.

That was my point.
it was a joke tho sis. i know it's different...................
Yeah a lot of people 'joke' in these situations.
except in this case it actually was a joke, other wise i wouldn't have used the gif, so you can be at ease lamb
Reply
Like
Share

Joined: May 6th, 2003, 9:55 am

October 14th, 2017, 4:46 pm #650

^ Joined 04 Oct 2017 12:30

And Shayne is probably going to ban you now anyway, so bye lamb.

Everyone else, it's not that serious.  We are still going to find out what leaks here because we are obviously going to discuss them here.  It's just the links aren't going to be posted in the forum.  Why is that so hard to understand?
Reply
Like
Share