wrote:

September 18, 2009 – J. Craig Venter, Ph.D., founder, president and chairman of the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI), has been named a recipient of this year’s National Medal of Science. Dr. Venter will be awarded the Medal from President Obama on October 7 at a White House ceremony.
http://www.zimbio.com/J.+Craig+Venter/a ... +Synthetic

Now, what was Obama giving this most prestigious award to JC Venter for?

Well, Venter was the first scientist to successfully map the genetic code of humans..But he wasn't happy with that. He wanted to "create" synthetic life...

What is Venter's motivation?

wrote:The father of genomics and the founder of synthetic biology startup Synthetic Genomics, Craig Venter, is now officially god.
http://earth2tech.com/2010/05/20/craig- ... te-change/

The atheists have jumped on board with this, attempting to discredit God. They say, "see, man can create life!". But, Venter still needs a living cell as a host for his synthetic life, or as he has named it, Synthia. Gotta love how the word Sin is in the word, Synthia. The name of the beast will be full of blasphemies...

Venter, is a hardcore atheist...

wrote:Has Venter made us gods?

Does Craig Venter's creation of life in the laboratory finally squeeze God right out of the scientific universe?

Life is basically the result of an information process – a software process" says Venter,
and "Starting with the information in a computer, we put it into a recipient cell, and convert it into a news species".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... r-life-god

So, May 20th, 2010, exactly one month before the Horizon Disaster, Venter announces he has created synthetic life. He has even formed a company called Synthetic Genomics. Synthetic Genomics is funded by Exxon, and some of the largest investors are,

wrote:A round of financing from Draper Fisher Juvetson, Meteor Group, Biotechonomy LLC and Plenus, S.A. de C.V. In 2007 SGI closed its Series B round of financing with BP plc and ACGT Sdn Bhd.
http://www.syntheticgenomics.com/investors/

Now what would BP be doing investing in synthetic genomics??
The answer lies in algae.

wrote:Synthetic Genomics was founded back in 2005 to commercialize Venter’s work, and has been focusing on a variety of applications for its genetic technology, including creating algae-based biofuel. Synthetic Genomics has raised money from investors including venture capital firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson and oil giants BP and Exxon Mobil.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =127010591

Furthermore, Venter want to put his Synthia in vaccines.

wrote:"We decided that [by] writing new biological software and creating new species, we could create new species to do what we want them to do, not what they evolved to do," says Venter.

Venter has founded a company called Synthetic Genomics, where he intends to use these new species to do things like make new fuels and new vaccines.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =127010591

Now, here's where it gets really creepy. Venter has put a watermark into the genetic code of Synthia..and before I post what he put into the code, I would like to remind readers of Revelations...

Revelation 13
15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

OK, so you can't buy or sell without the mark, or the name, or the number....

What is in the (water)mark of Synthia?

Many things like...

wrote:Craig Ventner's research team used a simple natural bacterium that infects goats. It is called Mycoplasma mycoides.
...
The researchers call the four sets “watermark” sequences. Each watermark has more than one thousand letters.
The coded letters contain people’s names, famous sayings and a website to help identify the cell.
http://www1.voanews.com/learningenglish ... 88929.html

Within the genetic watermark of Synthia, is the name of the beast, Synthia.

Now, why watermark the genome? For one, so he can patent it and make money off of it. But more scary is, because if someone is "infected" with these synthetic cells, the can tell if you have the (water)mark or not. And if you haven't taken the Synthia based vaccine, according to the new health care bill, your DNA will not show the watermark, and you won't be able to buy, or sell...

Now, as Venter has said, this is completely controlled through computer software. Once a person is infected by this synthetic life, it self replicates, until the entire person it has infected is actually a synthetic person, effectively creating a planet of zombies that can be controlled through a software program beamed world wide through Satellite and HAARP technology..

wrote:The watermarks are distinct genetic codes that include quotes: “To live, to err, to fall, to triumph, and to re­create life out of life,” from James Joyce; “see things not as they are but as they might be,” from J. Robert Oppenheimer; and “what I cannot build, I cannot understand,” from Richard Feynmann.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... s-for-life

Now this has not been without controversy. Even in the scientific world, scientists are sounding the alarm, even going as far as saying this could be the end of the world as we know it...

wrote:Venter Unloads on NIH Director, Human Genome Project

SPIEGEL: Many fear what might happen if humans craft new life forms. They repeatedly say that you are playing God …

Venter: Yes, and I find them frightening. I can read your genome, you know? Nobody's been able to do that in history before. But that is not about God-like powers, it's about scientific power. The real problem is that the understanding of science in our society is so shallow. In the future, if we want to have enough water, enough food and enough energy without totally destroying our planet, then we will have to be dependent on good science.

SPIEGEL: Some scientists don't rule out a belief in God. [NIH Director] Francis Collins, for example …

Venter: … That's his issue to reconcile, not mine. For me, it's either faith or science - you can't have both.

SPIEGEL: So you don't consider Collins to be a true scientist?

Venter: Let's just say he's a government administrator.
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsid ... html?rss=1

Now, I posted where JC Venter needs a massive amount of algae to produce his goal...Hmm, where can we find a massive amount of algae...Let's take a look at the latest satellite image of the Gulf of Mexico...



Hmm, Thad Allan couldn't find any oil?? The green stuff, is algae folks. Once there is enough algae, they are going to release Synthia, and then you will see the beast rise out of the sea, literally.

So the technical name for Synthia is JVCI syn1.0 Doesn't JCVI = 666 ?

In 2006, Venter bought a boat called the Sorcerer II, to travel the oceans in search on new forms of genetic species. Some of those samples included the Gulf of Mexico.

Besides the Dept of Energy being one of the major funders, another major player is Gordon Moore. Gordon Moore, is once CEO of Intel. Moore, is also an exclusive alumni of Berkeley in California, which recieved a $500 million grant from BP to study algae based fuels.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Oce ... Expedition

Also:

wrote:In July 2009, ExxonMobile injected a sum of $600 million to enable better conversion of algae into fuel. Biologist from Craig Venter’s Synthetic Genomics will be responsible for introducing algae into the market.

http://www.renewablepowernews.com/archives/1211

I little background to the importance of algae, BP and it's funding of Berkeley.

OK, the coincidences are just too bizarre.

wrote:BERKELEY, Calif. — BP's catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is fueling opposition to the University of California, Berkeley's research partnership with the British company, with activists on the famously liberal campus demanding a severing of ties.

The oil giant gave UC Berkeley a $500 million grant in 2007 to create the Energy Biosciences Institute, which works to develop new sources of plant-based fuel. The 10-year deal is believed to be the largest-ever corporate sponsorship of university research, but has outraged students and professors who worry the global oil company will exert too much influence over academic research and damage the university's reputation.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... AD9HA60701


$500 million was "donated" by BP? A British based company donates 1/2 billion dollars to a US College to find fuel alternatives. Something stinks. So I dug a little deeper.
Now on the face of things, the Energy Biosciences Institute looks like a good thing, trying to create alternative fuels from plant species. But that all goes away when one digs a little deeper.

wrote:To provide alternatives to petroleum-based energy, enhance global security, and reduce carbon emissions, the U.S. government has mandated a greater proportion of our energy portfolio be derived from plant-based fuels (i.e., 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act; EISA). However, the potential benefits of this nascent bioeconomy may be offset by damage to our biosecurity via land-use change, inappropriate agronomics, rapid adoption of novel crops, and/or lack of proper federal oversight (1). Of these potential externalities—the unintended and often negative effects or byproducts from an activity—little attention has been given to economic or ecological damage from invasive biofuel feedstocks. For example, many plant species proposed, and in some cases under development, for biofuel production in the U.S. are invasive species or have a high likelihood of escaping cultivation and becoming invasive

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es100640y

I would ask folks to take a second and read the article. It is quite scary, and is a link I followed from here: http://www.energybiosciencesinstitute.org/
:shocking:

Now, here's where it get's real creepy. Remember the conspiracy theory out a bit ago about turning the Gulf into a dead zone, for creating algae for biofuels? Guess what?

wrote:In addition to terrestrial and aquatic macrophyte species, the energy industry is evaluating algae for renewable production of starches for alcohols, lipids for diesel fuel surrogates, and H2 for fuel cells (21). Algae have been shown to produce 250 times more oil than soybeans per unit area, and up to 31 times more oil per area than African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) (22). However, a number of non-native algal species are being considered for biomass, but despite the potentially severe environmental risks, they have yet to be evaluated for their potential escape and impacts. For example, strains of freshwater cyanobacteria such as Anabaena circinalis, Oscillatoria agardhii, and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii produce blooms known to cause serious illness or death to humans and animals. Open-water cultivation of non-native, or highly modified native algae, present an unknown risk to our waterways, drinking water reserves, and higher trophic level effects

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es100640y

When I read that, the hairs on the back of my neck stood up. :wtf1:

But it gets even creepier...

On June 20th, 2010, a blogger named JoAnneMor wrote this...

wrote:What they are doing is in three steps.

First get rid of oil industry in Gulf.

Then turn Gulf into a dead zone. A dead zone is free of life or ability to sustain it. The oil, dispersants and fertilizers deplete oxygen. It kills animals and fish, also turning their remains into fertilizer.

Finally, use Gulf as a giant Algae farm. Algae grows on water surface, getting oxygen from air, not water. Fertilizers like Urea supply much needed nitrogen. The Mississippi and the other rivers that empty into Gulf also pick up fertilizers from the many farms along the way. This feeds the Algae at the mouths of these rivers.

The oil in the water won't hurt the Algae. It will only promote it's growth and burn factor.

Algae costs about $2. a Barrel to refine. This is potentially very profitable.

http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/start ... -oil-spill

But this is what really got my attention...

wrote:That plan involves projects in the Great Lakes., Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico.

http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/start ... -oil-spill

OK, so officially, I am creeped out...It can't be just a coincidence that this Michigan oil spill is just in the right spot to feed into the Great Lakes...And Chesapeake Bay?

Remember the National Exercise called SONS 2010, which, on April 29th, 2010 held an exercise to combat an oil spill of "national significance" in the Chesapeake Bay?

wrote:Date: April 29, 2010

The oil spill response organization, Oil In The Bay, has deployed 60,000 feet of containment boom from Goose Pond to Moss Pond, and in small waterways. Approximately 500,000 more feet of boom has been ordered.

An estimated 12.6 million gallons of Mayan crude oil were originally onboard. The amount of oil spilled in the Chesapeake Bay is currently estimated at 2.25 million gallons. The Captain Banner crew is transferring oil from the ruptured tank to an undamaged tank to minimize spillage.

http://www.sons2010.com/go/doc/2221/515695

wrote:The devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is now going on 51 days. Various news reports and prediction modeling has suggested that there is a high probability oil will go beyond the Gulf of Mexico and enter into the Atlantic Ocean. What does that mean for our Chesapeake Bay? Will the oil reach as far north as our bay waters?

http://www.examiner.com/x-43633-Anne-Ar ... apeake-Bay

Now, today, ATS had an interesting thread, by DRJay1975.

wrote:Drove over the beach into Destin
, which is a very populated visible area, very different from where I just stopped. As soon as you cross the bridge, huge cleanup crews. Here they are picking up tarballs, unlike orange beach, that story will blow your mind. But they have booms and boats everywhere puttin on a show here. Nothing but the occasional tarball. Until I stepped out on my balcony. Hmm I've never seen the water look like this. Beautiful blue, except from the beach out about 50 yards. Weird green algae bloom. Never seen that here. Very thick. Authorities say it's seaweed. Nope. Looks like the same green algae you'd see in a small stagnant pond.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread598797/pg1

And last, but not least...

wrote:All along the coast, people speak of a lack of regulatory commitment and investment in scientific research on the gulf by state and federal lawmakers.

They note, for example, that over the last decade, the Environmental Protection Agency’s financing for the Chesapeake Bay Program, a regional and federal partnership, was nearly five times the amount for a similar Gulf of Mexico program, and a Great Lakes program was given more than four times as much.

http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/201 ... ?p=3&tc=pg

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost ... stcount=42