Cindy broke G wrist?

Cindy broke G wrist?

Pelle31
Pelle31

July 27th, 2012, 10:46 pm #1

http://www.broadstreethockey.com/2012/7 ... -jesus-war



who was it that said he was one of the dirtiest players and not as nice as he seems? they were right...
Quote
Share

Brett
Brett

July 27th, 2012, 11:19 pm #2

The princess gets away with a ton, and you know he won't step to and fight like man. He will cheap shot every chance he gets and then he gets hit back, falls down like he's been shot, and then cry to to the refs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xrpnB5AtGI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cZ5Bd0x9bE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Cgtx2lsul4

We can lament the point all day, but the best argument comes from the camera footage.
Quote
Share

PA
PA

July 28th, 2012, 1:04 am #3

I don't think anyone has a clean rap sheet anymore
Quote
Share

Philly200
Philly200

July 28th, 2012, 2:19 am #4

http://www.broadstreethockey.com/2012/7 ... -jesus-war



who was it that said he was one of the dirtiest players and not as nice as he seems? they were right...
There is a giroux faceoff, not against Crosby, but maybe word got out to go after his wrists. #11, I can't remember who that is, pins giroux's wrists to the ice with his stick with a force like he was trying to snap a branch. Nasty.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wh3xAo_l ... ata_player
Quote
Share

Philly 200
Philly 200

July 28th, 2012, 2:19 am #5

...
Quote
Share

Outland
Outland

July 28th, 2012, 1:28 pm #6

http://www.broadstreethockey.com/2012/7 ... -jesus-war



who was it that said he was one of the dirtiest players and not as nice as he seems? they were right...
Bobby did a lot more than break Kharlamov's ankle to earn his rep. He was the consumate rink rat and was loved for it. I know he was a fav of mine. Did he drop the gloves a lot? Nope. Look at other beloved Flyer rink rats especially Linseman & Suter. Fighters? Nope. It's one of the reasons I like Crosby. He's very talented, he's a bit nasty and he's a leader who will do what it takes to win.

Nice? Nice don't win bud. Without a doubt the Flyers are as dirty as Crosby is claimed to be but the blinders are on.


Outs
Quote
Share

Loki
Loki

July 28th, 2012, 3:33 pm #7

The league didn't protect Reggie Leach. The league didn't protect Bill Barber. On the contrary, the league was mortified by the Flyers.

Fast forward to today. The league doesn't protect Girioux or the Flyers as evidenced by the weak suspension handed down for the consecutive head shots by Neal.

The league does, however, coddle Malkenstein and Crosby. I don't think anyone is really saying the Flyers don't deserve some of the penalties and suspensions they get. But let's be honest, they do still get a lot tossed at them based on reputation and for being the Flyers. That really is indesputable.

I think what folk would like to see is the league recognize that Thidney isn't an altar boy and if he and Malken are going to play with that edge, then they better expect to "get theirs" when the time comes.
Quote
Share

Pelle31
Pelle31

July 28th, 2012, 4:01 pm #8

Bobby did a lot more than break Kharlamov's ankle to earn his rep. He was the consumate rink rat and was loved for it. I know he was a fav of mine. Did he drop the gloves a lot? Nope. Look at other beloved Flyer rink rats especially Linseman & Suter. Fighters? Nope. It's one of the reasons I like Crosby. He's very talented, he's a bit nasty and he's a leader who will do what it takes to win.

Nice? Nice don't win bud. Without a doubt the Flyers are as dirty as Crosby is claimed to be but the blinders are on.


Outs
None of those you mentioned as rink rats were being shoves down our throats as the face of the league ......he is the best player when 100% healthy ....if he gets to that point again......

I think the better point is had G done that to him the whine would have flowed the whole series up until today.....the league would have looked into it and the next game if anyone had even looked at Cindy they would get a penalty...that's the difference that rubs the wrong way
Quote
Share


Confirmation of reply: