Link: Copy link
rcw is a sub clan of cwc, so we should treat em like it and include em :Ogary wrote:too bad we only have 5 clansJeffsonT wrote:why cant we have ladders?
for example, we have 6 clans, just an example:
game 1:clan 1 vs clan 2 ( the winner out of this game goes to round 2 )
gane 2:clan 3 vs clan 4 ( the winner out of this game goes to round 2 )
game 3:clan 5 vs clan 6 ( the winner out of this game goes to round 2 )
winner out of game 1 or 2 or 3 vs winner out of game 1/2/3 *see below*
winner of round 2 vs whoever is left
and how to tell who vs who in the beginning, you could put the clans name in a hat, and draw? =p
and that same thing for who vs who first for the 2nd round.
just an opinion
that way, its up to cwc staffs, and not the leaders.
edit: and for the clans that refuse to war eachother, we could discuss on that, but i think that either the clan that says no, forfeits, or have a cwc staff watch that game(s)
Possible more ideas:
if not a tournament, we should somehow just make wars more interesting. Idk about others, but warring the same people over and over and over and over throughout the year could be a bit boring=p
you can have different types of wars, like clan + clan vs clan + clan? idk
something like that ^
THAT HATS FUCKED UPkura wrote:@Jeff The use of ladders is saying that certain clans are not good, and some are amazing. That translates to bias.
@Tiny I was called biased for using a hat, that system doesn't work anymore.
2 members and a council agreeingSup3r wrote:xigabar5 wrote:AnimeDude wrote: