Michael Wolsey host of "Visibilty"

This forum will be dedicated to responses to our detractors.

Michael Wolsey host of "Visibilty"

Craig Ranke CIT
A Regular Jim Garrison
Craig Ranke CIT
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 30 Aug 2007, 02:01

28 Jul 2009, 17:04 #1

This alleged truther has a radio show.

I've never heard it because he is a sycophant for the small contingency of alleged truthers who focus on attacking other truthers and defending the official narrative at the Pentagon instead of uncovering evidence exposing the deception.

He has been on a rampage against us lately (along with Victoria Ashley) no doubt due to the undeniable impact of National Security Alert and the fact that we have such a long and impressive endorsement list.

Consider this a formal call to a civil and public debate on his show or any 3rd party show.

I have a feeling he will prefer to continue his baseless attacks in the shadows where we can not respond.
Reply
Like

Ligon
A Regular Jim Garrison
Ligon
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 14 Jul 2008, 21:20

08 Aug 2009, 00:23 #2

I sent Michael Wolsey this e-mail on Aug 4 to make sure he knew about this challenge/invitation, which began:

If you're calling CIT disinfo you need to either stop or debate them Michael.  They're not disinfo.

You've been formally challenged by Craig.
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=662

Alternatively, their phone number is on their website, www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com, in the contact section; call them and talk to them privately if you'd prefer.  Either way it's ridiculous for you to sit there and talk badly about them or the evidence they present when they're so accessible.


I got this response from ford@visibility911.com, probably automated:

"Thank you for contacting us at Visibility 9-11. We will get back to you shortly."


Three days so far and no response, no retractions, as predicted.
Reply
Like

Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Citizen Investigator
Domenick DiMaggio CIT
Citizen Investigator
Joined: 01 Sep 2007, 21:21

14 Aug 2009, 09:22 #3

he's a coward.
Reply
Like

Ligon
A Regular Jim Garrison
Ligon
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 14 Jul 2008, 21:20

14 Aug 2009, 19:09 #4

10 days and still no response for those who are counting. The fact that these people can only attack from the shadows and refuse to debate CIT or even respond via e-mail to (let alone talk on the phone with) a sincere person like me who is not in CIT but has studied the evidence carefully should tell you everything you need to know about their ingenuousness (or lack their of, rather).

I wrote Hoffman a sincere e-mail before too and received no reply.

Here is what happened the one time a detractor had the "cajones" to step out from behind his computer screen and actually have a debate/discussion with CIT:
http://thepentacon.com/craigvsadam.htm

You can see why they'd rather just write dishonest hit pieces.
Reply
Like

A. Marquis
A Regular Jim Garrison
A. Marquis
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 20:26

16 Aug 2009, 22:55 #5

We are still waiting Wolsey.

"Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph."
~Emperor Haile Selassie I, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah (Ras Tafari)
Reply
Like

Ligon
A Regular Jim Garrison
Ligon
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 14 Jul 2008, 21:20

02 Sep 2009, 18:06 #6

Wolsey said on TruthAction forum:

It was said that parts of the show description "may" be calling CIT disinfo agents, which of course isn't true. I was also very careful not to call anyone disinfo agents during the show.


Here are a few quotes from "the show" ( his radio interview with Jim Hoffman):

[15:30] WOLSEY:  If they can get you asking the wrong questions they don't have to worry about the answers.'  And this is, in my opinion, one of the things that happens with the disinformation.  And there are groups out there that have refrained from talking about it in the past, but today we're going to talk about it; in particular Pilots for 9/11 Truth and a group called Citizens [sic] Investigatoin Team, or CIT.  And I recall a [sic] article from Reprehensor from 911Blogger.com and a paper that he wrote called "On DisInformation And Damaging Associations".  And Reprehensor said basically 'If you're promoting this kind of poor information then you're no friend of mine, you're no friend of 9/11 Truth."  And it's time to break the silence about this.  It's time to start talking about this amongst ourselves, and to that end I'm happy to have on the line with me today Jim Hoffman, who's done some excellent work with regards to the disinformation.


[60:19] WOLSEY: Yeah, it’s just, it’s unbelievable.  And I mean, I’m not going to sit here and defend the official story, but at the same time, we have to... we have to follow the evidence where it leads.  And if it’s leading us in a particular direction then so be it.  But if you have con artists, and disinformation specialists out there shoving this garbage down your throat, which is, you know, a lot of the behavior that we have observed and documented.  You know, Arabesque has really done a lot on these guys.  And, you know, let’s tell folks where they can go, Jim, so they can get some more information, read Victoria’s article, your article, and, uh, some of Arabesque’s work.


"These guys" = CIT.

More quotes and link to mp3 here:
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?s...dpost&p=2315493
Reply
Like

Janusaur
Curious Citizen
Janusaur
Curious Citizen
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 05:50

02 Sep 2009, 18:50 #7

So if CIT aren't disinfo, there should be no problem with allowing them to respond on your show, right Wolsey?
Reply
Like

A. Marquis
A Regular Jim Garrison
A. Marquis
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 20:26

03 Sep 2009, 00:03 #8

Well that would be a problem because it appears as though Wolsey is actually the one disseminating disinfo.
"Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph."
~Emperor Haile Selassie I, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah (Ras Tafari)
Reply
Like

Craig Ranke CIT
A Regular Jim Garrison
Craig Ranke CIT
A Regular Jim Garrison
Joined: 30 Aug 2007, 02:01

26 May 2010, 18:17 #9

Wolsey has been quiet about us all year but here is proof that he is continuing to trash us behind the scenes.

Jeff "shure" Hill made this email exchange public:



Michael Wolsey May 21 at 11:11pm wrote:

CIT, or Craig Ranke and Aldo Marqui are, IMO, some of the worst disinformation in the 911 movement. I have covered this topic extensively at my website and even did a couple of interviews on CIT with Jim Hoffman and Frank Legge. I will give you some links that I hope will help. Let me know. Thanks.

Michael



Michael Wolsey May 25 at 8:44am wrote:


Hey Jeffrey-

I am a bit curious, what exactly is your relationship with craig and cit?




Jeffrey Hill May 25 at 11:43am wrote:

I just "met" Craig online when he and his diciples started to attack me at P4T for calling Pentagon witnesses:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=19971

And ever since then we have been arguing back and forth!



Michael Wolsey May 25 at 11:56am wrote:

I am just curious because I heard the call where you and Craig were calling together and so I thought perhaps you were working together. It seems odd to me though because you seem to be asking the questions in a calm and respectful way and just gathering the information but Craig obviously has an agenda in his line of questioning, something he has always denied. You seemed to be genuinely disgusted, perhaps embarrassed as you stepped in to ease the tension, and then later after Evey hangs up, Craig rebukes you for it. Just seems a bit confusing to me so ya, would like to talk with you more.


Call to Lee Evey with my "rebuke" of Jeff Hill included at the end:

Lee Evey call 5-21-2010
Reply
Like

Stefan
Citizen Researcher
Stefan
Citizen Researcher
Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 11:51

01 Jun 2010, 16:06 #10

The funny thing is Woolsey has no clue about the Pentagon evidence.

I remember when Jim Hoffman said there were "hundreds" of south of Citgo witnesses and Woolsey replies "exactly"...

um... what?

There are none, if he had the first clue about the evidence he'd know this, but he doesn't. Yet he feels equipped to accuse others doing real research "disinformation"?

What gall.

Come on Michael, if you're so sure of yourself why not show up for a debate and we can see how much you really know.
Reply
Like