What scale figures should Airfix tool up?

This forum is for you to put your "favourite", "best type" and "the kits you would like to see released and re-issued" posts & polls.
Which scale(s) would you buy?
Hedgehog
Red Star
Red Star
Joined: 13 Oct 2011, 15:29

31 Oct 2016, 12:31 #16

I voted for 1/72,6 :)

I would appreciate ground crews for aircrafts , passengers for airliners, crews for vehicles and pilots for aircrafts .... in hard plastics, not the soft bendable nearly unpaintable soft material used for most small scale soldiers.
The printed page is obsolete. Information isn’t bound up anymore. It’s an entity. The only reality is virtual. If you’re not jacked in, you’re not alive.
Reply
Like

David Pickering
Red Star
Red Star
Joined: 07 Nov 2011, 14:49

28 Mar 2017, 10:04 #17

1/72 and 1/76, as that's what I've mostly done to date. I try to combine the two scales - as long as they are kept reasonably far apart on the battlefield the clash isn't too painful, though there are limits... (I won't be pitting the WWII German Infantry, first tooling, against the 2011 British Infantry any time soon!).
Most of my pics are of figures and models prepared for use in solo wargaming.
Reply
Like

Nigel Bee
Red Star
Red Star
Joined: 21 May 2010, 19:32

28 Mar 2017, 20:09 #18

I voted for 1/72, 1/76,and 1/12. I made a lot of 1/12 historical figures as a boy and would like to see them revived.
nigel bee  There are old pilots and bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots.
Reply
Like

ntrocket88
Two Gold Stars
Two Gold Stars
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 23:35

28 Mar 2017, 21:59 #19

I voted for 1/76 because it's what I actually want and 1/72 because for figures the difference isn't too bad.
Neil

With every model I learn a little more... and then the next one takes longer!

My Portfolio
Reply
Like

roadhousedisco
Silver Star
Silver Star
Joined: 27 Jul 2009, 15:12

29 Mar 2017, 19:00 #20

Hi all, I voted for -

1/72. Come on Airfix, what about a box of pilots. There seem to be quite a few mutterings about a lack of pilots not just in Airfix kits but other makes as well.
1/48. Same as above really.
1/32. Or even 1/35. Anything to compliment the AFV's that are on the market
1/24. Car drivers, passengers, pedestrians, ground personnel for airfields. Anything to make a build a bit more interesting.

Just my musings.

Mark.
Reply
Like

James Russell
Bronze Star
Bronze Star
Joined: 21 Oct 2008, 20:29

30 Mar 2017, 01:52 #21

I voted 1/76, 1/72, 1/48, and 1/32(54mm). I just love the 1/76 scale figurines from Airfix's toy soldier heyday. I expect that 1/72 scale figurines to match better the airfield range might be a good move and perhaps this will be the path Airfix takes for all braille scale sets in the future. Because 1/48 scale has not been swamped with sets so much, perhaps there is more range for movement. The 1/32 scale range is still very good (in some respects unsurpassed) and there is potential for expanding it with multiplying effect.

In my favorite, 1/76 scale - I remember getting a set of the first Afrika Korps with just one newer MP38 Schmeisser pose. I've also seen an example of a first set German Infantry that included one prone Japanese rifleman. The Japanese Infantry set includes a prone soldier with a Type-11 light machine-gun, and it is obviously from a different sculptor from the balance of the set. Which leads to this little muse . . . could Airfix introduce just two or four new poses into existing sets? It has to be possible - the molds have had new poses joined into them before. Would this represent a reasonable amount of new to get a return?
Imagine the current Italians with a couple fewer Beretta M1938s and marching soldiers and an 81mm mortar ensemble and a couple of Breda M1930 LMGs.
Imagine the current Japanese set with fewer of the riflemen stabbing the sky with their rifles and a couple of imports from the 1/32 poses - mostly the knee mortar, and a proper Type 100 SMG.
Imagine the current Russians with much of the repeated poses taken out to make room for scaled-down 1/32 poses.
Airfix simply has to replace its British sets - they are weak.

My thoughts. Happy modelling!
Reply
Like

jezbrook
Red Star
Red Star
Joined: 18 Jun 2006, 10:35

30 Mar 2017, 09:28 #22

The odd Japanese figure was an attempt by Airfix to see if scaling down its 1:32 figures to 1:76 was feasible. The 'second edition' sets (e.g. 8th Army, Afrika Korps) used the seven 1:32 figures plus several new poses.

All of this was possible because the figures were panto-graphed down from the original masters (1:12 usually). It would have been possible to scale to 1:32 the new figures, thus giving us 15 or 16 different poses in the 29 piece sets.

Unfortunately, the masters were all lost around the time Humbrol bought Airfix. Apparently it is not possible to panto-graph down from a 1:32 master (The WW2 British Infantry and Support Group would make a lovely 1:76 set)!

The sculptor of the later Airfix figures and Britains was Ron Cameron who has recently died. Airfix seems unable to find a decent sculptor (see the recent 1:76 British Infantry).

I would love to see new Airfix figures as I believe the existing figures are largely unsurpassed and Airfix did start the ball rolling with its Infantry Combat Group, etc. But I want them to look like the old figures (anatomically correct, not bow-legged or dwarfish or in strange poses).

Perhaps when Airfix is in a better financial position and if a decent sculptor(s) can be found we could see a return to more sets but at the moment the competition is pretty fierce.

jezbrook
Reply
Like

chrism
Gold & Bronze Stars
Gold & Bronze Stars
Joined: 27 Jun 2011, 10:59

30 Mar 2017, 10:56 #23

As someone who has all the existing sets of 1:76/00 small figures, a lot of the fixed pose 1:32 and all the multipose sets,
I am a tad biased

(voted: first, second and fourth!)
Reply
Like

Paws4thot
Blue Star
Blue Star
Joined: 20 Sep 2016, 08:55

30 Mar 2017, 13:38 #24

@jezbrook - Well, it's theoretically possible to pantograph any size to any other size, but it's probably inadvisible to do an awkward ratio from a pantograph copy "master" to a "new size".
"Is there anything I can do to help you?"
"Yes. Give me a staffel of Spitfires!"
Reply
Like

waghorn41
Red Star
Red Star
Joined: 10 Feb 2013, 14:49

05 Jul 2017, 18:43 #25

Well I've gone for 1/72, 1/48 and 1/32
1/72 in 'hard' plastic for aircrew and groundcrew as well as the usual military ranges for wargamers and some civilians would be good to get the railway modellers business.
1/48, well air/ground crew to go with the abundance of models these days; ww2 and later
1/32 because they won't do 1/35; I'd like some post WW2 like the Korean theatre and also 1970's NATO
ex-RAF Hunter mechanic
Hawker Hunter model project: built 36, stash 30+, total to build 100+
2016 target/built 12/10
2017 target/built 6/10
2018 target/built 6/1
Reply
Like

danny_1960
Silver Star
Silver Star
Joined: 19 Jun 2017, 03:48

24 Jul 2017, 19:36 #26

I voted for 1/72 and 1/76 figures. When you're a kid it doesn't matter if the figure is a little bit bigger; now I don't care for that, either.
Some figures are rather old, say: ACW Confederate Infantry, ACW Union Infantry, ACW Artillery, Commandos.
I knew a second mould for the Commandos, better than the first (I have these soldiers in my collection), but Airfix whitdraw it, I don't know why.
Others are really awkward: the bases of the horses... My! I couldn't stand some of them in all my childhood!! :lol: :hithead:
Others, I may say, are simply brilliant: WW2 German Infantry and Afrika Korps, Japanese Infantry (I spend many, many hours thinking about that guy that is running, rifle in the air... It was the first to die, of course), US Marines, Australian Infantry, Waterloo figures... :wow:
I think Airfix Figures Range is good, better even than Esci's Boxes that in some case merge soldiers of two countries (!).
Reply
Like

Fergal71
Green Star
Green Star
Joined: 25 Apr 2013, 09:59

25 Jul 2017, 16:37 #27

I voted for 1/76 and 1/72, these are the scales I'd usually work with for dioramas,

My personal opinion for 1/32 is that 1/35 would be more popular to go with other manufacturers kits, 1/35 seems more popular than 1/32, although I could be wrong on this
Reply
Like

RobertA
Yellow Star
Yellow Star
RobertA
Yellow Star
Yellow Star
Joined: 06 Mar 2017, 18:30

10 Jan 2018, 23:13 #28

i revoted. my preference is 1/76 figures. going with the armour and softskins in that scale.
im afraid its a scale on the way out, so little chance of seeing a few new decent figure sets. but you never know, fingers crossed.
:-)
Reply
Like

adrianmf
Green Star
Green Star
Joined: 17 Sep 2009, 12:37

20 Feb 2018, 10:19 #29

1/72 and 54mm for me. I loved the Collectors Series figures back in the day (although not as much as I loved Historex, but pocket money only went so far). I've also put in a shout for 1/48 to go with the aircraft in that scale - I only do 1/72 but somehow I have in 1/48 all of the Inpact models, an Airfix Fury, Hurricane and Spitfire, and three Schneider racers. I don't know how that happened!
Reply
Like

David Pickering
Red Star
Red Star
Joined: 07 Nov 2011, 14:49

20 Feb 2018, 15:58 #30

I don't know much about panto-graphing, but you'd think in these days of laser scans and 3d printing Airfix would find it fairly straightforward to scale down any of their 1/32 sets to 1/72 and create new moulds from that... or am I missing something? Failing that, they could always invite enthusiastic amateur figure modellers (like we happy few on this site) to have a go at sculpting any requested 1/32 figure(s) in 1/72 (or, indeed, new figures altogether)! 
Most of my pics are of figures and models prepared for use in solo wargaming.
Reply
Like