Between the candadtes bush,kerry, nader, badnarik or Bandwagon who would vote for

When I was in college, many years ago, there was a joke going around that a certain professor was going to be replaced. When the day came, his replacement was a soft buzzer. It wasn't loud enough to keep you awake, and didn't provide any information.

I have started comparing candidates to a soft buzzer. Would the country be better off with this candidate or with a soft buzzer? This year, I think that a soft buzzer would be better for the country than any of the candidates on offer. The bills congress passed well before the end of a session would pass for lack of a veto, but those at the end would be rejected for lack of a signature. Most last minute legislation is bad enought to need vetoing so this sounds good to me. There wouldn't be anyone in the position to start a war, although the defensive functions of the military would be intact. This also sounds good to me.

So what do you think. Would you vote for a soft buzzer?

Between the candadtes bush,kerry, nader, badnarik or Bandwagon who would vote for

I think it's best we avoid politics here except when related to breast freedom issues.

I'll second that. Any political discussion should be related to the main focus of the forum.

Yep! I was going to say that I'd vote for any candidate who's wife would do this... and then I was going to insert a photo of myself riding my bike topfree...but Peter had to work again today and we didn't get a picture. sorry folks. I think he gets a couple of days off the beginning of the week. But wouldn't that be an interesting reason to vote for someone?

I'll second that. Any political discussion should be related to the main focus of the forum.

Yes there are plenty of places to talk politics on the web. And things are so polarized in the country now that it just gets everyone's dander up. I think BFF can do without that.

Yep! I was going to say that I'd vote for any candidate who's wife would do this... and then I was going to insert a photo of myself riding my bike topfree...but Peter had to work again today and we didn't get a picture. sorry folks. I think he gets a couple of days off the beginning of the week. But wouldn't that be an interesting reason to vote for someone?

Yeah wouldn't it be great to have a bra-free candidate or even a bra-free "first lady"?

I remember what an impact Jackie Kennedy had on fashion getting women out of the long stodgy styles of the '50s.

Ofcourse, with the current political climate the chances of that are from zero to zilch.

I remember quite a few photos of Jackie Kennedy in which it was obvious that she was not wearing a bra. In addition, of course, there were the photos of her sunbathing nude.

I too have that recollection, I think it was well past the White House years though.

Still we need good examples, and leadership, and many people admired Jaqueline K.

It gets away from this concept of braless means loose morals and trampy behaviour.

But why should a presidential candidate be a man Michaela - she could have a top-free cycling partner too?

---