question?

question?

Joined: January 15th, 2005, 5:02 am

March 4th, 2005, 2:33 pm #1

As I have stated in earlier posts my wife is a breast cancer survivor. She had total reconstructive surgery. That means she not only had the breast mound made but also the aerola and nipple. However, many women who go through reconstructive surgery decide not to have the last stage of surgery performed. That is the making of the nipple and aerola. They just want the cleavage. My question is. Would it be legal for a woman to go topless that has had her breasts removed? Also what if she did have a breast reconstruction but did not go through with the surgery that forms the nipples and aerola?
Quote
Like
Share

Anudist
Anudist

March 4th, 2005, 5:19 pm #2

The reason that you question is interesting is that I know that some state laws allow "exposure" but only to the point of the nipple and surrounding tissue. If there is no nipple, hmmmmmmmm.
Quote
Share

Joined: January 29th, 2002, 3:39 am

March 7th, 2005, 1:33 am #3

That's exactly why I think that all states should legalize topfreedom for women--to eliminate the possibility of such hypocrisy. Who would punish a breast cancer survivor for showing off her "war wounds" (i.e. double mastectomy and reconstructed breasts, with or without nipples)?
Quote
Like
Share