evidence that Bible floods were real !

evidence that Bible floods were real !

wilz
wilz

July 6th, 2012, 2:23 pm #1

There are ancient pyramid like structures underwater in the ocean beyond India, Alexandria, Japan , beneath the Caribbean sea.

There are pyramids found in europe ! (why are pyramids so popular between people from the past even living on different continents? could they have been ONE people speaking the same language -like what the bible said about the tower of babel ??)

An ancient temple has also been found under lake titicaca -south america

In China - ancient artifacts estimated to date from between the 13th and 16th century AD were found under the sea in China.

Theres also sunken cities like the sunken city of cuba, bay of cambay in india,Cleopatra's Palace in Alexandria (Egypt), sunken city in Croatia .

Theres so many ancient cities, artifacts and statues found by divers beneath the sea that i dont have time to name all.

How and why did they end up that way underwater ?? could it be the Biblical flood was true all along ?? well if its evident in so many countries on different continents , at around the SAME TIME in history then that should be obvious that its got to be a flooding on global scale , so were definitely looking at a world wide flood here ! So come to think of it -Noah's flood would most definitely explain this !!!!

Quote
Share

GET REAL!
GET REAL!

July 14th, 2012, 2:15 pm #2

Haven't you ever heard of ice ages, followed by the melting of polar ice? It causees ocean levels to radically go up and down over time.

I can't believe you're ignorant of this very simple explanation for why cities and monuments have ended up under the sea.

It has nothing to do with floods, otherwise we could say that we're in a flood right this moment - because all those things you mentioned are underwater right now.

You need to go to the doctor and ask for an injection of "logic"!!!
Quote
Share

Noxi
Noxi

July 15th, 2012, 5:13 am #3

Weve all heard of the 'Ice Age' @ Get Real, but who is really demonstrating their Ignorance by not asking how this ice age came into effect.??????

Uniformitarian scientists have severe difficulties accounting for ice ages so how do you @ Get Real account for it seeing as you are so 'Intellectually Superior' to everyone else perhaps you could give us all a reason ?????????

http://www.icr.org/article/272/
0rhttp://www.answersingenesis.org/article ... ce-age-fit

When attempting to account for ice ages, the uniformitarian scientists do not consider one key elementthe Genesis Flood. A worldwide Flood would have caused major changes in the earths crust, as well as earth movements and tremendous volcanism. It would have also greatly disturbed the climate.

A shroud of volcanic dust and aerosols (very small particles) would have been trapped in the stratosphere for several years following the Flood. These volcanic effluents would have then reflected some of the sunlight back to space and caused cooler summers, mainly over large landmasses of the mid and high latitudes.

Abundant evidence shows substantial Ice Age volcanism, which would have replenished the dust and aerosols in the stratosphere. The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets also show abundant volcanic particles and acids in the Ice Age portion of the ice cores.

An ice age also requires huge amounts of precipitation. The Genesis account records the fountains of the great deep bursting forth during the Flood. Crustal movements would have released hot water from the earths crust along with volcanism and large underwater lava flows, which would have added heat to the ocean.

Earth movement and rapid Flood currents would have then mixed the warm water, so that after the Flood the oceans would be warm from pole to pole. There would be no sea ice. A warm ocean would have had much higher evaporation than the present cool ocean surface. Most of this evaporation would have occurred at mid and high latitudes, close to the developing ice sheets, dropping the moisture on the cold continent. This is a recipe for powerful and continuous snowstorms that can be estimated using basic meteorology.

Therefore, to cause an ice age, rare conditions are requiredwarm oceans for high precipitation, and cool summers for lack of melting the snow. Only then can it accumulate into an ice sheet. All the evidence pointing towards the creation of an Ice Age points toward "The Genesis Flood".!!!!!!!!
Try again @Get Real!!!!

Quote
Share

hello ?
hello ?

July 15th, 2012, 11:09 am #4

Haven't you ever heard of ice ages, followed by the melting of polar ice? It causees ocean levels to radically go up and down over time.

I can't believe you're ignorant of this very simple explanation for why cities and monuments have ended up under the sea.

It has nothing to do with floods, otherwise we could say that we're in a flood right this moment - because all those things you mentioned are underwater right now.

You need to go to the doctor and ask for an injection of "logic"!!!
"get real" the ice ages are not facts . They are theories which means just a "belief" ,its not proven that it happened . Anyways this theory,like the evolution theory, has been changed so many times that its not even funny !

If an ice age did happen then wouldn't ALL LIFE ON EARTH SEAZ TO EXIST AFTER IT ??? even lizards,crocodiles, snakes and other animals that need HEAT die ????????

why are animals and humans still alive today ? dont you think the extreme cold for that long period of time(millions of years of an ice age according to it) ,would have killed ALL living things and so stopping life on earth ???

If there was an ice age then i would like you to explain how the ice would freeze all animal and plant life for some very long period of time, then unfreeze for a long period of time without killing off the plant and animal life as we know it today ???? you and i are evident of their being NO SUCH THING AS AN ICE AGE.

P.S your name is referring back to you. Get real.


hello ?
Quote
Share

Observing
Observing

July 15th, 2012, 5:18 pm #5

Weve all heard of the 'Ice Age' @ Get Real, but who is really demonstrating their Ignorance by not asking how this ice age came into effect.??????

Uniformitarian scientists have severe difficulties accounting for ice ages so how do you @ Get Real account for it seeing as you are so 'Intellectually Superior' to everyone else perhaps you could give us all a reason ?????????

http://www.icr.org/article/272/
0rhttp://www.answersingenesis.org/article ... ce-age-fit

When attempting to account for ice ages, the uniformitarian scientists do not consider one key elementthe Genesis Flood. A worldwide Flood would have caused major changes in the earths crust, as well as earth movements and tremendous volcanism. It would have also greatly disturbed the climate.

A shroud of volcanic dust and aerosols (very small particles) would have been trapped in the stratosphere for several years following the Flood. These volcanic effluents would have then reflected some of the sunlight back to space and caused cooler summers, mainly over large landmasses of the mid and high latitudes.

Abundant evidence shows substantial Ice Age volcanism, which would have replenished the dust and aerosols in the stratosphere. The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets also show abundant volcanic particles and acids in the Ice Age portion of the ice cores.

An ice age also requires huge amounts of precipitation. The Genesis account records the fountains of the great deep bursting forth during the Flood. Crustal movements would have released hot water from the earths crust along with volcanism and large underwater lava flows, which would have added heat to the ocean.

Earth movement and rapid Flood currents would have then mixed the warm water, so that after the Flood the oceans would be warm from pole to pole. There would be no sea ice. A warm ocean would have had much higher evaporation than the present cool ocean surface. Most of this evaporation would have occurred at mid and high latitudes, close to the developing ice sheets, dropping the moisture on the cold continent. This is a recipe for powerful and continuous snowstorms that can be estimated using basic meteorology.

Therefore, to cause an ice age, rare conditions are requiredwarm oceans for high precipitation, and cool summers for lack of melting the snow. Only then can it accumulate into an ice sheet. All the evidence pointing towards the creation of an Ice Age points toward "The Genesis Flood".!!!!!!!!
Try again @Get Real!!!!
There you go again, Noxi. Noxi, the anti-truth seeker who violates the most fundamental rule of finding the truth: you never, ever pick and choose only that evidence that suits your pet theory.

Those who truly want to find the truth look at all the evidence and evaluate ALL the evidence in their mind, both pro and con, using that body of evidence to find the truth.

But not our Noxi. Our Noxi finds articles on the internet that support his biased view, usually coming from websites that don't pretend in the least to be objective. Then Noxi points to those sources as being "proof" of his veiwpoint, which he further embellishes and exaggerates to make it look even stronger. But he's conveniently (very conveniently) forgotten to tell us that there's heaps of evidence going the other direction.

If Noxi were a judge in a court of law he'd be finding the innocent people guilty and the guilty people innocent time and time again for the same reason...... he would be conveniently ignoring any evidence that didn't fit his preconceived assumptions and bias.

It's not just Noxi guilty of this, it's many people and not only Christian but also athiest. But none of them ever actually get very close to the truth because they insist on being "pick and choosers"' of the evidence.

Those who truly seek the truth with an objective mind always get closer to it compared to the Noxi's of this world!
Quote
Share

Noxi
Noxi

July 15th, 2012, 11:01 pm #6

Good one "Observing" there you go again! You are never able to debate the issue just attack people!
Is there anything on this Board that you have contributed to in a meaningful way ?????? All we see from you are personal attacks.

If I am that much of a threat to you dont read or respond to my posts! Simple.....NEXT!!
Quote
Share

wilz
wilz

July 16th, 2012, 12:20 pm #7

"get real" the ice ages are not facts . They are theories which means just a "belief" ,its not proven that it happened . Anyways this theory,like the evolution theory, has been changed so many times that its not even funny !

If an ice age did happen then wouldn't ALL LIFE ON EARTH SEAZ TO EXIST AFTER IT ??? even lizards,crocodiles, snakes and other animals that need HEAT die ????????

why are animals and humans still alive today ? dont you think the extreme cold for that long period of time(millions of years of an ice age according to it) ,would have killed ALL living things and so stopping life on earth ???

If there was an ice age then i would like you to explain how the ice would freeze all animal and plant life for some very long period of time, then unfreeze for a long period of time without killing off the plant and animal life as we know it today ???? you and i are evident of their being NO SUCH THING AS AN ICE AGE.

P.S your name is referring back to you. Get real.


hello ?
hmm yes the ice age theory ! makes me wonder if any1 would take it seriously since it also has a cartoon animation about it ? parts 1-4 ? have you heard the latest one coming out soon ICE AGE 4 ? just kidding. haha .

On a serious note, one would go through a hard time trying to explain how reptiles and animals that would other wise die without the heat (sunlight) to warm there blood. The ice age theory tells of cold dark periods in the past when ice ages besieged the Earth. But then that would be trouble for cold blooded animals right ? how would they have survived that long period without freezing to death ? even humans would not survive that ! have you watch adrenaline junkies that travel to the north pole and south pole and get frozen to death on national geographic channel? most of them develop health problems in such conditions !

snakes, alligators, frogs, lizards, salamanders, skunks, toads, turtles, crocodiles, geckos, spiders, sharks, chameleons, fish, scorpions, and insects are all cold blooded that WONT SURVIVE a very long period of time without sunlight and heat . But they exist today !(proving there wasnt such an ice age)

You wont find ANY of those animals at the south and north poles to ! just goes to show they woulnt ever survive even half an hour of such extreme cold.

Just some important i should add: the total surface area of the tiny animals like lizards snakes, geckos etc.. according to biology , would mean they would loss so much heat rapidly (like human babies) that they would be dead within a couple of hours or possibly a day , without sunlight .

On the other hand if you stick with the noahs flood story, then you dont have to explain anything really, the fossil layers ,different soil layers and ancient cities found deep in the earth speak for themselves.

Anyway how would ice cause the sunken cities to be buried deep in the earth with different layers of soil above ? ice only lays on the top surface of the land and will never form such layers of soil . only a flood would do that.




Quote
Share

kiltz
kiltz

July 21st, 2012, 6:41 am #8

The ice ages affected the region of earth near the 2 poles. The tropics still remained relatively warm, more than warm enough for reptiles.

So much for your argument.... your ignorance speaks out again!
Quote
Share

Noxi
Noxi

July 22nd, 2012, 6:12 am #9

There we go again Kilts/Observing?? another useless peice of "Contradiction" this time without the TANTRUM!........Saying that the equator wasnt affected is total RUBBISH and a fallacy if you believe in the scientific approach! If your going to call people idiots make sure you dont look like one first!

The latest 'scientific' see herehttp://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/ ... 111168.htm

Instead of 'snowball earth', the planet really became 'slushball earth'.

Professor Richard Peltier and colleagues from the University of Toronto publish their hypothesis today in the journal Nature. The great chill, the longest and deepest ice age in earth's known history, happened during the late Neoproterozoic era, 850 to 542 million years ago.

The evidence for the snowball thesis comes from deep sediments in the ocean. Scientists look through these layers to measure levels of the isotope carbon-13 (C13), deposited in plants through photosynthesis, as a telltale of earth's climate. Above and below the era's Cryogenian layer is an abundance of C13. But the Cryogenian layer itself has negligible levels of this isotope.

Coupled with other signs of intense glaciation, the explanation is that earth froze over completely.

According to the 'snowball earth' hypothesis, thick ice covered the oceans and glaciers crept down into the tropics, even reaching the equator.


Quote
Share

ahumm
ahumm

July 22nd, 2012, 8:19 am #10

The ice ages affected the region of earth near the 2 poles. The tropics still remained relatively warm, more than warm enough for reptiles.

So much for your argument.... your ignorance speaks out again!
so kiltz why dont u try and explain in your intelligent words how cold and heat can exist at the same spot at one time ????
Quote
Share