YOU STUPID BASTARD!!!!
He thought he could blow up Loose Change's spot, but it looks like he blew his own in the process. He says that he spent 6 days working on it so that he could get it to Dylan before the United 93 demonstration. Wow! What conviction! He actually transcribed the movie word-for-word [and poorly, I might add], included screenshots, and even did a lot of his own research. But the piece comes off as if it was written by a professional 9/11 debunker, who resorts to adolescent criticisms that don't hold up.
Has anyone else seen this garbage critique?
You made me spend 5 minutes OF MY TIME on this ridiculously stupid DISINFORMATION document which is clearly written by a DISINFORMATION TERRORIST (Or, as you put it, "professional 9/11 debunker")
1. On page 6 of this expert critique, you find the transcript from the movie:
00:03:07,100 --> 00:03:12,300
At an altitude of 32000 feet, cruising altitude for a commercial jetliner.
And the very important comment which clearly shows the whole Loose Change movie is just "conspiracy theory":
"Three minutes and twelve seconds and nothing you’ve said has had a connection to 9/11."
The comment is probably appropriate because everything said until then has a connection to 9/11, but only if you have a functioning brain and therefore are able to connect the dots. If I hit you in the head with a hammer then most people would probably find it relevant that I had a hammer in my hand before hitting you, however, it may be less relevant if I choose to deny hitting you in the head even though it's got a big hole.
2. On page 7 of this EXPERT review, I find the quote from the movie "The Department of Justice releases a terrorism manual, with the World Trade Center in crosshairs."
and the comment..:
"That’s the north tower, WTC 1, in the crosshairs. It was bombed iby Islamic terrorists in 1993.
The terrorists were trying to knock the north tower into the south, killing tens of thousands of
people. They did a lot of damage, but “only” six people died, and the cyanide gas that had been packed with the bomb was incinerated by the explosion."
While I think DoD planning 9/11, not the 1993 bombing, where the reason for the crosshairs, it must be pointed out that the 1993 WTC bomber was a 43 year old Egyptian, Emad Salem. According to stories from the New York Times, Salem was paid $1,000,000 and was trained by the FBI to perform this reprehensible act. Salem figured out that he was being set‑up to be the patsy and taped John Anticev. Anticev, a top American FBI agent, told Salem to proceed with the bombing!
This act of treason is quite interesting, isn't it? It is also of interest that someone who apparently wrote a 285-page long viewer's guide did not take the time to research such basic facts..
3. On page 8 of this EXPERT review, I find
"Are you going to keep reciting facts unrelated to 9/11? We don’t have all day here."
WOW. THE AUTHOR WROTE THIS 285-PAGE "REVIEW" AND DON'T HAVE ALL DAY HERE!?
Clearly, someone was payd to write this pile-o-dung and did a poor job of it.
I totally agree: The document was clearly written by a DISINFORMATION TERRORIST.
It was not written by someone even remotely interested in the truth; it was, in my opinion, clearly written by someone who's goal is to cover-up the truth.
I understand that you feel like being kind and call it a "professional 9/11 debunker". Some call such people "a liar". Steven E. Jones
always use the term "data falsification" when the government presents disinformation. But I personally think the term DISINFORMATION TERRORIST fits because 9/11 was an act of terrorism and those who try to cover-up the truth are complicit; thus terrorist.
WARNING: Don't bother to read this document unless you are researching disinformation terrorist and Psychological Operations. No new information about 9/11 can be found in this document. However, if you want to learn a thing or two about professional 9/11 debulkers and disinformation terrorist, then you may want to look briefly at it.