Wtc7 23 Minute Warning Before The Collapse

Wtc7 23 Minute Warning Before The Collapse

abcd
Advanced Member
abcd
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 1 2006, 04:31 AM

Feb 25 2007, 08:34 PM #1

I don't know how far its true but, I found this on google videos-

On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or (World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.


Video- WTC-7 BBC reporting


BBC WTC-7 Videos

Edited to add the correct videos
Quote
Like
Share

Reggie_perrin
Advanced Member
Reggie_perrin
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 18 2006, 04:15 PM

Feb 25 2007, 08:59 PM #2

:blink:
Quote
Like
Share

fretwire
Advanced Member
fretwire
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 19 2006, 07:14 PM

Feb 26 2007, 12:04 AM #3

Very interesting to say the least. If you watch the video, you can clearly see WTC 7 in the background of the live reporting.

What will probably happen is you'll get the old "we knew it was going to collapse anyway" excuse from the govt.
Quote
Like
Share

Reggie_perrin
Advanced Member
Reggie_perrin
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 18 2006, 04:15 PM

Feb 26 2007, 12:30 AM #4

Trying to play devils advocate, but maybe it was put out that it might collapse and it's been misconstrued by reporters and once it reached the studio it became "has collapsed", but still then they would be predicting something that has never before, in the history of steel framed sky scrapers, happened, so it would still beg the question, 'HOW' did somebody know it was going to collapse ? given that steel frame buildings rarly (ever?) collapse from fires.

The collapse of wtc7 takes another twist.
Quote
Like
Share

Starbelly
Advanced Member
Starbelly
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 19 2006, 07:11 PM

Feb 26 2007, 02:18 AM #5

What. The. Fuck.

Is this for real? First ive heard of it.

Does this coincide with the claims from people like Craig Bartmer who says he was told WTC7 was goin to be coming down?
Quote
Like
Share

Starbelly
Advanced Member
Starbelly
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 19 2006, 07:11 PM

Feb 26 2007, 02:24 AM #6

Reggie_perrin @ Feb 26 2007, 12:30 AM wrote: Trying to play devils advocate, but maybe it was put out that it might collapse and it's been misconstrued by reporters and once it reached the studio it became "has collapsed", but still then they would be predicting something that has never before, in the history of steel framed sky scrapers, happened, so it would still beg the question, 'HOW' did somebody know it was going to collapse ? given that steel frame buildings rarly (ever?) collapse from fires.

The collapse of wtc7 takes another twist.
Not to mention how did they know it was WTC 7 that was coming down. Despite how damaged you want to say it was. Wasnt WTC 5 and 6 engulfed in flames? Besides WTC 7 was further away from the towers than those others buildings

Really crazy how BBC were reporting its collapse nearing 30 minutes before its sudden 6.5 second collapse.
Quote
Like
Share

waterdancer
Advanced Member
waterdancer
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 22 2006, 02:41 AM

Feb 26 2007, 02:33 AM #7

This isn't the first early collapse report I've run across, though it is the first from an actual news source that I've seen. In a couple of internet forums I've run across early reports-one even as early as sometime in the late morning, something like, a third building has now collapsed a fifty story building near the world trade centers. I wish I could find that one again. Some early reports show up in this thread, for instance. Looks like a pre north tower north tower collapse report and a CNN WTC 7 may well collapse report about an hour prior to the collapse.
Quote
Like
Share

btbalance
Advanced Member
btbalance
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 19 2006, 05:47 AM

Feb 26 2007, 06:11 AM #8

wow..

the clip of the live shot begins at 14:50:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 1#014m50ss
Quote
Like
Share

shure
Advanced Member
shure
Advanced Member
Joined: Dec 24 2006, 09:56 PM

Feb 26 2007, 08:38 AM #9

AMazing isn't it !!!!!!!!




Updates Link:
http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi?board=bbc

;)
Quote
Like
Share

Dereck Breuning
Advanced Member
Dereck Breuning
Advanced Member
Joined: Jan 5 2007, 11:20 AM

Feb 26 2007, 09:11 AM #10

Reggie_perrin @ Feb 26 2007, 12:30 AM wrote: Trying to play devils advocate, but maybe it was put out that it might collapse and it's been misconstrued by reporters and once it reached the studio it became "has collapsed", but still then they would be predicting something that has never before, in the history of steel framed sky scrapers, happened, so it would still beg the question, 'HOW' did somebody know it was going to collapse ? given that steel frame buildings rarly (ever?) collapse from fires.

The collapse of wtc7 takes another twist.
Uhm, it's a reporter and his studio's duty to report actual facts and correct information. So the whole maybe it was misinterpreted thing doesn't add up.

It is really weird that they report it approx. 30min. before the building actually comes down. Maybe someone leaked a copy of the script for that day?

"Who writes this shit?"
If ten is ordinal perfection, then eleven is perfect organization plus one more, one extra. One more than required, an extra measure, something more than only what is required. Eleven is the number of revelation.
Quote
Like
Share

Coersion
Advanced Member
Coersion
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 7 2006, 01:21 AM

Feb 26 2007, 09:35 AM #11

What. The. Hell ?

:blink:

That is damning footage
Quote
Like
Share

DoYouEverWonder
Advanced Member
DoYouEverWonder
Advanced Member
Joined: Feb 19 2007, 11:07 PM

Feb 26 2007, 09:49 AM #12

Did they adjust for Daylight Savings Time?
Quote
Like
Share

Coersion
Advanced Member
Coersion
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 7 2006, 01:21 AM

Feb 26 2007, 09:59 AM #13

lol, I hope your not being serious :P , the building is still standing in the background.
Quote
Like
Share

sesshin
Advanced Member
sesshin
Advanced Member
Joined: Feb 23 2007, 06:47 AM

Feb 26 2007, 10:40 AM #14

Quoted from one of the firemen:
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.
So they knew that the building was going to collapse at least three hours before it actually did. The BBC probably heard about the impending collapse and misinterpreted that to mean the building had already collapsed. So really its just nothing more than sloppy reporting, which isn't surprising considering how chaotic that day was.
Quote
Like
Share

28th Kingdom
Advanced Member
28th Kingdom
Advanced Member
Joined: Jan 25 2007, 09:41 AM

Feb 26 2007, 11:01 AM #15

#1 Sesshin... yer a maggot... deal with it...

#2 Who is this reporter... he's already talking about exchanging freedom for security... there is something very strange about this video.

#3 Sesshin... yer still a fvcking maggot, so shut up.
Quote
Like
Share

shure
Advanced Member
shure
Advanced Member
Joined: Dec 24 2006, 09:56 PM

Feb 26 2007, 11:06 AM #16

sesshin @ Feb 26 2007, 10:40 AM wrote: Quoted from one of the firemen:
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.
So they knew that the building was going to collapse at least three hours before it actually did. The BBC probably heard about the impending collapse and misinterpreted that to mean the building had already collapsed. So really its just nothing more than sloppy reporting, which isn't surprising considering how chaotic that day was.
They started reporting at 4:57pm (EST) that WTC 7 had collapsed and were still reporting that it had collapsed while she was standing in front of the building with her big HEAD !

They continued to report it had collapsed all the way up to the live feed "MYSTERIOUSLY" blacking out just minutes before WTC 7 actually fell at 5:20pm (EST) !!!!!!!!

COME ON NOW !

NOBODY IS A GOOD ENOUGH LIAR TO TALK THIER WAY OUT OF THIS ONE !

--------------------------------------------------
Danny Jowenko just reconfirmed on Friday Feb. 23 2007
THAT THERE WAS NO WAY FIRE BROUGHT DOWN WTC 7 !

Danny Jowenko conversation Youtube link thanx to "einsteen"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDxF9uEf4
Quote
Like
Share

Rpaul
Advanced Member
Rpaul
Advanced Member
Joined: Feb 11 2007, 03:42 AM

Feb 26 2007, 11:23 AM #17

They started reporting at 4:57pm (EST) that WTC 7 had collapsed and were still reporting that it had collapsed while she was standing in front of the building with her big HEAD !
:lol:

They just kept on diggin their hole while she was blabbing on. Until some nasty party pooper wised up.
Their only possible excuse is they confused had collapsed with was going to collapse, that doesn't work because it was repeated over and over again that the building had collapsed, the lead shill even went so far as to say the building was probably empty.

It's a great video.
Quote
Like
Share

shure
Advanced Member
shure
Advanced Member
Joined: Dec 24 2006, 09:56 PM

Feb 26 2007, 01:57 PM #18

Here are the phone calls the the BBC inquiring about this damning Evidence !

click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download:

Phoen calls to BBC letting them know thier oops !

<_<
Quote
Like
Share

Coersion
Advanced Member
Coersion
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 7 2006, 01:21 AM

Feb 26 2007, 03:38 PM #19

Wow that's awesome man, wonder if she will bother having a look.

Either way, if Alex hasn't seen this yet then someone should get the video over to prisonplanet.
Quote
Like
Share

miragememories
Advanced Member
miragememories
Advanced Member
Joined: Oct 20 2006, 03:15 PM

Feb 26 2007, 04:47 PM #20

I think too much is getting read into this.

Clearly this report was rushed to air before any research had been done. It's likely all the repeated 'on-the-street' reports about the imminent collapse of WTC7 eventually got distorted by a reporter, and "gonna collapse" became "did collapse."

It was a major gaff on the BBC's part for sure, especially given the fact that no one immediately identified the burning building behind their 'live' reporter as the 'still standing' WTC7 building which she was claiming had already collapsed. Since it was the last major standing structure still pouring out heavy smoke on the site, you'd think they might have checked it's identity..amazing..unbelievably poor work on their part.

You would have thought in the roughly 7 hours that passed after the collapse of WTC1, that the BBC Research Dept. would have located maps and visuals of the area so they would be familiar with what they were seeing in their 'live' feed, or, duh..had there on-the-scene people find out for them..I guess they figured that the clearly viewable smoking 47-storey building in their live feed must have been WTC7a, WTC7's twin tower?

It's also pathetic that no one at the BBC seemed to wonder why none of their satellite feeds from the major American TV networks were reporting such a major event. Did they not ask themselves how odd it was that no one but their on-the-scene reporter noticed the sudden collapse of this 47-storey building?

Talk about extremely sloppy..maybe it will damage their credibility regarding the recent 9/11 'hit piece'?

MM
Quote
Like
Share


Confirmation of reply: