What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll

A place to cast your opinion into the sea.

What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll

betty
Member
betty
Member
Joined: Jul 26 2007, 09:33 PM

Jul 29 2007, 09:08 PM #1

Cities maybe that won't blow up, ya'll

Total votes: 9
0(0%)
0(0%)
3(33%)
1(11%)
0(0%)
1(11%)
0(0%)
2(22%)
1(11%)
1(11%)

What do ya'll think about this?? :)))
Reply
Like
Share

Alliednations
Newbie
Joined: Jul 30 2007, 02:20 AM

Jul 30 2007, 02:57 AM #2

Technically, they're all in danger. If the government was behind 9/11, then all U.S. cities are doomed. If the terrorists did it, then they could easily infiltrate that city and blow it up. Both ways, we're doomed. However, if the government DID NOT do anything, and is actually telling the truth that 9/11 was a terrorist attack, then we are safer, than from a conspiracy theorists point of view. Can anyone prove me wrong? A good debater learns from mistakes. Mistakes fuel conspiracy theorists.
Reply
Like
Share

Remian
Member
Remian
Member
Joined: Dec 5 2006, 10:25 PM

Jul 30 2007, 04:10 AM #3

I don't really like this poll. As a joke I'd say Houston or Austin because...why would they blow up the acting President's land of glory. But then again, seriously, I'd say New York. They wouldn't attack the same place twice in such a short timespan...but then again...I think we're all in danger.
Reply
Like
Share

SPreston
Advanced Member
SPreston
Advanced Member
Joined: Jun 23 2007, 12:46 PM

Jul 31 2007, 05:22 PM #4

betty wrote:What City Is The Safer One, Or Safest Cities,ya'll
What do ya'll think about this?? :)))
Remian wrote:I don't really like this poll. As a joke I'd say Houston or Austin because...why would they blow up the acting President's land of glory. But then again, seriously, I'd say New York. They wouldn't attack the same place twice in such a short timespan...but then again...I think we're all in danger.
I did not bother to vote because an important ingredient was left out; namely Which cities do not have skyscrapers insured for 'terrorist attacks' by Larry Silverstein? That seems to be an important consideration, so offhand I would say for now stay out of Chicago and New York. The Bush Regime desperately needs another 'terrorist attack' so perhaps small towns would make better choices for residence. By they you surely don't mean the same old patsies from the first round, or do you? B)
'Hindsight allows us to realize that
9-11 was the Bush Administration's
first shock and awe
campaign.'

..$$$ $$$ THE NEW WORLD ORDER $$$ $$$
..................322..................] $$$....................666.................] $$$................... 322
.....................THE ENDS ALWAYS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS
.........................ENDLESS WARS FOR ENDLESS PROFITS
...THUS 9-11 WAS JUSTIFIABLE TO THIS NECESSARY END
....
Reply
Like
Share

abcd
Advanced Member
abcd
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 1 2006, 04:31 AM

Jul 31 2007, 07:03 PM #5

Democratic states and Anti-war states more likely to hit

Example -NY, SF, DC etc
Reply
Like
Share

Remian
Member
Remian
Member
Joined: Dec 5 2006, 10:25 PM

Jul 31 2007, 10:02 PM #6

Now that I think about it, dead children would be good pro-war propaganda =/
Reply
Like
Share

abcd
Advanced Member
abcd
Advanced Member
Joined: Nov 1 2006, 04:31 AM

Aug 1 2007, 09:58 PM #7

Remian @ Jul 31 2007, 10:02 PM wrote: Now that I think about it, dead children would be good pro-war propaganda =/
Incidentally, Sr Bush ralied the first Iraq war by claiming Saddams govt killed incubator babies.


Video - Sr Bush Lies about dead babies to rally 1st Iraq war

OR

Google "incubator babies iraq bush"
Reply
Like
Share

SPreston
Advanced Member
SPreston
Advanced Member
Joined: Jun 23 2007, 12:46 PM

Aug 2 2007, 03:18 PM #8

abcd wrote:
Remian wrote:QUOTE (Remian)
Now that I think about it, dead children would be good pro-war propaganda =/
Incidentally, Sr Bush ralied the first Iraq war by claiming Saddams govt killed incubator babies.


Video - Sr Bush Lies about dead babies to rally 1st Iraq war

OR

Google "incubator babies iraq bush"
To be honest, murdered and raped and roasted with Napalm little Iraqi children hasn't done too well for Baby Bush this time around. B) :rolleyes:




Real US Casualty Figures in Iraq - Echoes of Vietnam
http://www.flying-dragon.com/resistance ... index.html
'Hindsight allows us to realize that
9-11 was the Bush Administration's
first shock and awe
campaign.'

..$$$ $$$ THE NEW WORLD ORDER $$$ $$$
..................322..................] $$$....................666.................] $$$................... 322
.....................THE ENDS ALWAYS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS
.........................ENDLESS WARS FOR ENDLESS PROFITS
...THUS 9-11 WAS JUSTIFIABLE TO THIS NECESSARY END
....
Reply
Like
Share


Confirmation of reply: